Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

How Russians fight

Nina L Khrushcheva 28th April 2023

Ordinary Russians are unable to protest against the Ukraine war. But evidence of covert resistance is everywhere.

Russians,Ukraine,Putin
Back in the USSR? A billboard supporting the war, with the ‘Z’ and ‘V’ symbols and the hashtag ‘We don’t abandon our own’ (PhotoChur/shutterstock.com)

During World War II, the iconic American film director Frank Capra created a documentary series entitled Why We Fight. Originally produced by the United States Department of War as a training film, the theatrical release was meant to convince Americans that the coalition against Adolf Hitler warranted their support and that the defeat of the Nazis directly served American interests. The project was a success, though it is impossible to measure the film’s impact precisely. In the Soviet Union, another major party to the fight, the public needed no such convincing, as the battle for survival was happening on their own territory.

That is not the case with Russia’s war against Ukraine. The Kremlin certainly wants to portray its ‘special military operation’ as a patriotic endeavour. But far from chanting the World War II slogan, ‘Our fight is just; victory will be ours’, many Russians are wondering why they are fighting at all.

Voting with their feet

In a January poll, some 25 per cent of respondents—and over 60 per cent of city-dwellers and younger people—reported that they did not support the war. Only 27 per cent of young people surveyed voiced their support. This is notable in a country where expressing doubts about the government’s actions can land you on a ‘foreign agents’ list, or worse.

Many other Russians have voted with their feet: more than 500,000 have left the country since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and those who have stayed are deeply worried about their future. According to a recent Gallup-Romir poll, 48 per cent of Russians report experiencing significant financial uncertainty—the highest rate in the 56 countries covered. Even among the 45 per cent of Russians who say they support the war unequivocally, only 25 per cent do so actively, such as by volunteering or providing financial assistance.


Become part of our Community of Thought Leaders


Get fresh perspectives delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for our newsletter to receive thought-provoking opinion articles and expert analysis on the most pressing political, economic and social issues of our time. Join our community of engaged readers and be a part of the conversation.

Sign up here

None of this is good news for the Kremlin, which has been trying desperately to push its war narrative. The campaign, the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, declares, aims not only to ‘demilitarise’ and ‘denazify’ Ukraine but also to prevent the west from succeeding in its purported mission to destroy Russia. What is at stake, according to the Kremlin’s propaganda, is nothing less than ‘the survival of Russian statehood’ and the future of its young people. Furthermore, Russia’s latest foreign-policy doctrine asserts that the country is fulfilling its ‘unique historic mission’ to ‘maintain a global balance of power’ and ‘build a multipolar’ world order.

Smacked over the head

That is propaganda worthy of the Great Patriotic War, as Russians call World War II, and the public is being smacked over the head with it. Television is dominated by war narratives. Billboards celebrating Russian war heroes and advertising tank shows line Moscow’s streets. ‘Victory will be ours,’ they declare in true WWII style, though they leave out the first part of the classic slogan.

As shocking as the war has been for the west, its impact there cannot compare to how it has upended Russian life. The war has meant a sudden, forcible and bewildering transformation of Russia’s economy and society.

European civilisation, in particular, has always been part of Russia’s cultural code, despite lengthy periods of confrontation with the west. But, according to Putin, Russia is now a ‘self-sufficient state-civilisation’ and European culture is slowly being eliminated from Russian theatres and museums, if not from restaurants and cafes (which are still French and Italian). For example, the 19th-century play Cyrano de Bergerac, by Edmond Rostand, has been removed from the repertoire of Saint Petersburg’s Alexandrinsky Theatre for supposedly discrediting the Russian armed forces.

Big Brother

Such cultural bans are of course not the only way ordinary Russians are being made to feel Big Brother breathing down their necks. Since the ‘partial mobilisation’ announced last September, a police officer has been stationed at every metro turnstile in Moscow. It is tough to pretend that nothing has fundamentally changed when mere entrance to public transport is controlled by a heavily armed man.

All of this has made it increasingly difficult for Russians to go about their lives. In the early months of the war, conversations may have been dominated by the events in Ukraine but it still felt natural to go to work or have dinner with friends. As war propaganda has grown louder and more insistent, ordinary life has moved into the background.

The Ukraine war is now at the forefront of Russians’ minds—though not in the way the Kremlin wants. Rather than fight for Putin’s ‘patriotic’ cause, Russians are resisting it. While they are unable to protest en masse, let alone drive Putin from the Kremlin in one fell swoop, evidence of the covert fight of the ‘silent majority’ is everywhere.

Peredelkino, a village less than 20 miles (32 kilometres) from Moscow, is known for its wooded terrain, through which Soviet writers, including Boris Pasternak, often ambled. Now, the high-profile oligarch and Putin ally Roman Abramovich, who is rumoured to oppose the war, owns much of that terrain. And ‘no to war’ carvings mark the tree stumps that line the forest paths.


Support Progressive Ideas: Become a Social Europe Member!


Support independent publishing and progressive ideas by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month. You can help us create more high-quality articles, podcasts and videos that challenge conventional thinking and foster a more informed and democratic society. Join us in our mission - your support makes all the difference!

Become a Social Europe Member

An Orwellian mug

At a bookstore on Saint Petersburg’s central Nevsky Prospect, a display of patriotic books on Russia was adorned by a mug emblazoned with an image of George Orwell and the caption ‘Let Big Brother think that there is tea in this mug’. Inspired by the brave arranger of this display, I bought that mug, which, I discovered the following day, was replaced with another. This one displayed a quote from Orwell’s masterpiece 1984: ‘If you are in a minority, and even alone, this does not mean you are crazy.’

This is how we fight. As in WWII, no one has to tell us why.

Republication forbidden—copyright Project Syndicate 2023, ‘How Russians fight’

Nina L Khrushcheva
Nina L Khrushcheva

Nina L Khrushcheva is professor of international affairs at the New School in New York and co-author of In Putin’s Footsteps: Searching for the Soul of an Empire Across Russia’s Eleven Time Zones (St Martin's Press).

You are here: Home / Politics / How Russians fight

Most Popular Posts

Russia,information war Russia is winning the information warAiste Merfeldaite
Nanterre,police Nanterre and the suburbs: the lid comes offJoseph Downing
Russia,nuclear Russia’s dangerous nuclear consensusAna Palacio
Belarus,Lithuania A tale of two countries: Belarus and LithuaniaThorvaldur Gylfason and Eduard Hochreiter
retirement,Finland,ageing,pension,reform Late retirement: possible for many, not for allKati Kuitto

Most Recent Posts

OECD,inflation,monetary The OECD and the Great Monetary RestrictionRonald Janssen
prostitution,Europe,abolition Prostitution is not a free choice for womenLina Gálvez Muñoz
Abuse,work,workplace,violence Abuse at work: who bears the brunt?Agnès Parent-Thirion and Viginta Ivaskaite-Tamosiune
Ukraine,fatigue Ukraine’s cause: momentum is diminishingStefan Wolff and Tetyana Malyarenko
Vienna,social housing Vienna social-housing model: celebrated but misusedGabu Heindl

Other Social Europe Publications

strategic autonomy Strategic autonomy
Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 scaled 1 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship

ETUI advertisement

The future of remote work

The 12 chapters collected in this volume provide a multidisciplinary perspective on the impact and the future trajectories of remote work, from the nexus between the location from where work is performed and how it is performed to how remote locations may affect the way work is managed and organised, as well as the applicability of existing legislation. Additional questions concern remote work’s environmental and social impact and the rapidly changing nature of the relationship between work and life.


AVAILABLE HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound Talks: does Europe have the skills it needs for a changing economy?

In this episode of the Eurofound Talks podcast, Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound’s research manager, Tina Weber, its senior research manager, Gijs van Houten, and Giovanni Russo, senior expert at CEDEFOP (The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training), about Europe’s skills challenges and what can be done to help workers and businesses adapt to future skills demands.

Listen where you get your podcasts, or for free, by clicking on the link below


LISTEN HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The summer issue of the Progressive Post magazine by FEPS is out!

The Special Coverage of this new edition is dedicated to the importance of biodiversity, not only as a good in itself but also for the very existence of humankind. We need a paradigm change in the mostly utilitarian relation humans have with nature.

In this issue, we also look at the hazards of unregulated artificial intelligence, explore the shortcomings of the EU's approach to migration and asylum management, and analyse the social downside of the EU's current ethnically-focused Roma policy.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI European Collective Bargaining Report 2022 / 2023

With real wages falling by 4 per cent in 2022, workers in the European Union suffered an unprecedented loss in purchasing power. The reason for this was the rapid increase in consumer prices, behind which nominal wage growth fell significantly. Meanwhile, inflation is no longer driven by energy import prices, but by domestic factors. The increased profit margins of companies are a major reason for persistent inflation. In this difficult environment, trade unions are faced with the challenge of securing real wages—and companies have the responsibility of making their contribution to returning to the path of political stability by reducing excess profits.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube