Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Let’s Give A New Boost To European Works Councils

by Stan De Spiegelaere on 12th July 2016

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Stan De Spiegelaere

Stan De Spiegelaere

The social policy track record of the European Union is bleak at best. But in one field the EU did make a marked difference: in 1994 it agreed on the European Works Councils Directive. In multinational companies of a certain size, employee representatives from across Europe have since enjoyed the right to be informed and consulted by management. But has the momentum stalled?

Together with the national works councils, these European Works Councils (EWCs) protect the fundamental right to ‘information and consultation in good time and at the appropriate level’, as enshrined in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. Concretely, the European Works Councils can be organized in multinational companies with more than 1000 employees and at least 150 employees in two EEA countries.

Looking at the figures, the EWC policy could be called a success. Over the years, more than 1000 EWCs have been created, mobilizing tens of thousands employee representatives from all over Europe and covering an estimated 19 million employees.

This year, the European Commission is planning an evaluation of its policy and while the figures may look impressive, there is still a need to propel things forward and search for ways to increase the number of EWCs created.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

30 more years to establish a fundamental right

 Let’s not get blinded by the light and take a second look at the figures. After some years of steep growth, the number of new EWCs is falling. Between 2012 and 2014 new EWCs amounted to only 24 compared with the record year of 1994 when more than 400 EWCs were created.

At the current pace, it would take over 30 years before all employees in multinational companies are guaranteed their fundamental right to information and consultation on transnational issues.

And this decline is not because of a lack of companies eligible to have an EWC. Although there is no perfect list of all companies that could have one, the available estimations suggest that even today less than half of all companies eligible actually have an EWC in place. This means that there are still about 19 million employees lacking transnational information and consultation rights. And at the current pace, it would take that long to get them covered.

Known obstacles and solutions

Realising this, Europe returned to action in 2009 by launching a Recast of the original directive. This Recast had as one of its objectives to increase the number of EWCs. It tried to do so in various ways but was markedly ineffective in stimulating the creation of more EWCs as the most common obstacles remained unaddressed: the lack of awareness, information and capacity.

  • Awareness: A good many employees in multinationals do not even know about the possibility of creating an EWC. They don’t even know it exists. This is obviously a pretty big problem because as a rule, EWCs are created on the initiative of the employees or their representatives.
  • Information: Even when employees are aware of the existence of EWCs, they and their representatives often do not know whether their company is large enough or not. This information is not public. There is no administrative database or registry of European multinationals, including data about the number of employees they have.
  • Capacity: Even when there is awareness and information, employee representatives need to be able to start the process. They need to know the representatives or employees of other countries and to liaise with them, overcome linguistic barriers and start negotiations. In companies and sectors with low trade union density or in countries with weak national information and consultation traditions, employees often lack the capacity to enforce their fundamental rights.

These barriers are known, important but also perfectly surmountable. Country-by-country reporting about employee figures could help solve the information problem, information campaigns directed to those companies could resolve the awareness issue and capacity building can happen through strengthening trade unions’ presence and improving local works councils.

If Europe is serious about becoming Triple A Social Europe, as it claims to want to be, it can start by ensuring fundamental rights to information and consultation on transnational issues for all employees.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Let’s Give A New Boost To European Works Councils

Filed Under: Politics

About Stan De Spiegelaere

Stan De Spiegelaere is a researcher at the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards