Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Populists Are Taking Over—Here’s Why Democracy Is Failing

Mark Blyth 17th January 2025


Dissatisfied voters and outdated systems fuel populism’s rise. Can bold reforms restore trust in liberal democracy? A conversation with Mark Blyth.

u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2

Henning Meyer: Mark Blyth, thank you very much for joining me today. We’re here to discuss the global ramifications of the second Trump presidency, particularly for the European Union, in the political and economic context we find ourselves in—or will find ourselves in shortly. Let’s begin with Trump’s “America First” agenda. How do you see this playing out in terms of trade policy, and what disruptions might this create for the EU? More importantly, how should the EU respond to mitigate these risks?

Mark Blyth: Thanks, Henning. Well, the EU has had four years to prepare for something like this—or at least to devise contingency plans. But here’s the thing: many seemed to assume that the election of Trump in 2016 was an aberration. That assumption was a mistake. Trumpism isn’t a fluke; it’s the new normal.

You see this reflected in Europe too. In the UK, Reform, led by Brexit’s architect, is gaining momentum. In France, Marine Le Pen’s National Rally could very well emerge as the leading party. Austria’s politics are shifting, and even Germany’s AfD, while geographically limited, highlights broader trends. Yet, there’s a persistent denialism in Europe—a belief that populism is a passing phase. That complacency has left the EU ill-prepared for what might come next.

The challenge is compounded by the sheer unpredictability of Trump’s presidency. His administration is filled with individuals who, frankly, seem intent on antagonising Europe. And then there’s Trump himself—a wildcard. It’s not beyond imagination that he could declare a national emergency on dubious grounds or take drastic steps we can’t yet anticipate.

Henning Meyer: That unpredictability is unsettling. It seems like even within the US, there’s little clarity on what Trump’s priorities will be on day one.

Mark Blyth: Exactly. No one knows. The first few days could bring a blizzard of executive orders, creating chaos that takes weeks or months to untangle. In the worst-case scenario, we could see him undermining institutions like NATO or taking unilateral steps to end the Ukraine war. How that would play out—especially without NATO—is anyone’s guess.

Trade is another area to watch. Previously, Trump’s ire was directed at German car exports. But with Europe’s automotive sector now under pressure from Chinese competition and the shift to electric vehicles, that’s less of a concern. Tariffs, however? Those could target anyone for any reason. We’re in uncharted waters here.

Henning Meyer: And what about Trump’s domestic coalition? It seems fragile, especially given tensions between the MAGA movement and tech billionaires—two factions that helped propel him back into office. Could those divisions derail his agenda?

Mark Blyth: That’s an interesting dynamic. Does Trump really need a stable coalition? He’s proven adept at dodging accountability and playing to his base. As far as he’s concerned, his re-election is a mandate, and he’s been transparent about his goals: mass deportations and tariffs.

If we try to make sense of these policies, there’s a theoretical framework that fits. Take the argument from Michael Pettis and Matthew Klein in their book Trade Wars Are Class Wars. They argue that globalisation disproportionately benefits large corporations while eroding workers’ livelihoods. For Trump’s team, the US as a structural importer—relying on goods from East Asia, Germany, and Europe—represents a strategic weakness. Rebalancing the economy by reducing imports, encouraging domestic production, and tightening labour markets through immigration restrictions could, in theory, create a more self-reliant US.

But here’s the problem: while these ideas have been floated, there’s no coherent strategy behind them. It’s all improvisation, which makes it even harder to predict outcomes.

Henning Meyer: Turning to the EU, what should its leaders be doing to prepare? Ursula von der Leyen’s second Commission has just started its term, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Mark Blyth: The EU needs to think strategically. It can’t isolate itself from the US, but it must prepare for a more confrontational transatlantic relationship. That means investing in resilience—whether in defence, energy, or trade. Strengthening ties with other global partners, particularly in Asia, could also help diversify Europe’s economic dependencies.

Above all, the EU must overcome its internal divisions. Trump’s unpredictability will test Europe’s unity. If member states can’t present a cohesive front, they’ll be vulnerable to divide-and-conquer tactics. The EU should be thinking not just about mitigating risks but also about asserting itself as a geopolitical actor in its own right.

Henning Meyer: And in terms of timing, when do you think we’ll have a clearer picture of what this presidency will mean for the EU and the world?

Mark Blyth: I expect the first week of the new adminstration to bring a deluge of executive orders. By the end of January, we’ll have a better sense of Trump’s priorities and how far he’s willing to go. But the real test will come in the months that follow, as the EU assesses whether it can adapt and respond effectively—or whether it’ll be left scrambling, as it was in 2016.

Henning Meyer: What do you think the EU should do to prepare strategically and protect its interests?

Mark Blyth: The first thing would be to double the EU’s budget—though, of course, that would be very unpopular. However, the EU needs fiscal room to manoeuvre, to incentivise certain behaviours, and to ensure unity. For example, Italy and Hungary must be prevented from making side deals. There has to be a united position on issues like sanctions. If sanctions are in place, it is essential to evaluate their purpose and what they aim to achieve. If they are jeopardising Europe’s car industry, for instance, reciprocal measures against the U.S. might be considered—though finding effective targets is tricky.

The EU is now heavily reliant on American LNG imports due to the Ukraine crisis, giving the U.S. leverage. The focus should be on identifying strategic sectors that are critical for Europe’s long-term interests. Can Europe survive potential tariffs? Would relocating more car production to the US actually be harmful, or could it create opportunities? Perhaps this is an opportunity for Europe to rebalance its own economy and reduce overreliance on exports.

Henning Meyer: You mentioned the EU’s internal divisions earlier. With leaders like Orbán in Hungary and Meloni in Italy, it is hard to see how the EU can unify. How does this affect the broader push for security and defence integration?

Mark Blyth: A stronger focus on security and defence is both necessary and overdue. However, the challenge lies in defining what Europe is fortifying against. Is it solely Russian revanchism? Fair enough. But much of this also ties into concerns regarding China. Concurrently, Europe does not want to be coerced by the US into adopting an overly hawkish stance toward China. This leaves the EU in a precarious position, building internal strength while navigating increasingly fractious external relations. Europe finds itself negotiating between a rock and a hard place.

Henning Meyer: Many people mistakenly believed that 2016 was an aberration. But this is constitutionally Trump’s second and final term. What happens to MAGA beyond Trump?

Mark Blyth: MAGA isn’t just about Trump; it is part of a broader collapse of trust in centre parties and traditional institutions. Decades of economic mismanagement, from the financial crisis to austerity policies, have eroded faith in the system. Immigration, for example, has been a massive concern for European populations. For years, policy elites dismissed these concerns, labelling anyone who raised them as racist. That arrogance only fuelled the backlash from the right.

This discontent isn’t limited to the US either; it’s global. I recently visited my hometown of Dundee, Scotland. In the 1980s, it was struggling, but there was still a sense of prosperity on main street. Today, a third of the stores downtown are boarded up. People in places like this feel abandoned. Political leaders show up every four years with promises, but their realities remain unchanged. This plight—what in the NHS calls “shit life syndrome”—drives support for populist figures like Nigel Farage, who acknowledge these frustrations, even if their solutions are flawed.

Henning Meyer: Amid all these challenges, is there any reason to be hopeful?

Mark Blyth: It’s hard to find optimism right now. But here’s the long-term view: America is about to make a big mistake by doubling down on carbon. Climate change is a problem of physics, not politics. Europe, despite some setbacks, is moving toward a green transition. Countries like Denmark and Norway are showing that you can build green economies even while relying on carbon in the short term. China, too, is serious about dominating green technology.

America’s current path may bring short-term gains, but in the long term, the rest of the world will move in a different direction. Europe has an opportunity here. If it can embrace rebalancing—consuming more, investing in infrastructure, and becoming less dependent on exports—it could create a more sustainable economic model. The next decade will be rough, but if we want to survive as a species, this is the direction we must take.

Henning Meyer: Mark, thank you again for joining me to discuss these critical issues. This conversation certainly calls for a follow-up in the near future.

This article is part of the Project “EU Forward” Social Europe runs in cooperation with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Mark Blyth
Mark Blyth

Mark Blyth is The William R. Rhodes ’57 Professor of International Economics and Professor of International and Public Affairs at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983467f bb39 37d5862ca0d5 0 Ending Britain’s “Brief Encounter” with BrexitStefan Stern
u421983485 2 The Future of American Soft PowerJoseph S. Nye
u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2 Trump Can’t Kill the Boom: Why the US Economy Will Roar Despite HimNouriel Roubini
u42198346fb0de2b847 0 How the Billionaire Boom Is Fueling Inequality—and Threatening DemocracyFernanda Balata and Sebastian Mang
u421983441e313714135 0 Why Europe Needs Its Own AI InfrastructureDiane Coyle

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

KU Leuven advertisement

The Politics of Unpaid Work

This new book published by Oxford University Press presents the findings of the multiannual ERC research project “Researching Precariousness Across the Paid/Unpaid Work Continuum”,
led by Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven), which are very important for the prospects of a more equal Europe.

Unpaid labour is no longer limited to the home or volunteer work. It infiltrates paid jobs, eroding rights and deepening inequality. From freelancers’ extra hours to care workers’ unpaid duties, it sustains precarity and fuels inequity. This book exposes the hidden forces behind unpaid labour and calls for systemic change to confront this pressing issue.

DOWNLOAD HERE FOR FREE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641