Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

The Reactionary Revolution: How a New Conservatism Rejects the Old Order

Justus Seuferle 14th April 2025

A new breed of conservative has emerged, one that paradoxically seeks radical change by yearning for a mythologised past.

u4219834676

The very word “conservative” traces its roots to the Latin “conservare”—to preserve or to maintain. Arthur Möller van den Bruck, a central figure in the Conservative Revolution, understood it as the forging of values worthy of preservation. For Franz Josef Strauß, conservatism was about tending the flame, while Konrad Adenauer famously distilled it to the principle of “no experiments.” Michael Oakeshott emphasised the inclination to favour the familiar over the uncharted. Samuel Huntington offered a straightforward definition: the conservative as the guardian of the existing order of their time and place.

Historically, the concept and the forces that have adopted it have always possessed a certain ambiguity, shaped by cultural and historical contexts. Yet, a novel form of conservatism is now taking shape—a kind of reactive revolutionary. Figures like Donald Trump and others of his ilk appear to have little interest in preservation; they challenge the prevailing order, embrace experimentation, and seem to envision a fundamentally different state, a different Europe, a different society. The era in which conservatives were the upholders of the state and its symbols seems to be receding into history. The traditional virtues of prudence, decency, and bourgeois traditions now appear to be championed by centrists and, in part, by those on the left. This new conservatism exists in a curious tension between revolution and reaction. If revolution, as Marx posited, is the sudden culmination of previously obstructed progress, is this new conservatism then the abrupt regression of previously hard-won advancements?

The Natural Order of Things

The intellectual trajectory of conservatism is marked by considerable ambiguity and cultural relativism, so much so that some scholars reduce it to a mere strategy for acquiring power. For the historian of ideas Panajotis Kondylis, conservatism initially served as the ideological arsenal of the aristocracy against the centralising forces of absolutism, a response to the separation of state and society and the rise of rationalism. Karl Mannheim famously argued that conservatism was a reaction to the French Revolution, a point also made by the renowned conservative thinker Edmund Burke. He spoke of the state as being formed by forces concealed behind a “sacred veil” that we ought not to lift. This underscores the notion of a natural, stable, and necessary order, underpinned by pessimism and the class interests of the powerful.

A fusion with Romanticism and the staunchly order- and stability-focused conservatism of Thomas Hobbes yields an amalgamation of the triad: order, hierarchy, nature. Here, as Huntington suggests, conservatism becomes akin to the ideology of the established order—the consciousness arising from the condition of feudalism. In the 20th century, a radical right-wing, fascist-leaning conservatism emerged, intellectually best represented by the so-called Conservative Revolution. This movement saw contemporary themes, such as nationalism, intertwine with a rejection of democracy, modernity, and socialism. Thinkers like Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, and Ernst Jünger spoke of the decline of the West, prioritised instinct over intellect, dismissed the interest-driven politics of democracy, and advocated for the creation of a state founded on the “German essence.”

Following the Second World War, conservatism largely transformed into a political ideology characterised by caution regarding political reforms and ambitions. This conservatism of “no experiments” diminished itself to a secondary virtue, lacking a distinct political objective. However, driven by economic instability and the successes of the left, a new interpretation surfaced in the nineteen-eighties, seeking to extend market principles to all spheres of life. Here, traditional conservative ideas of a just and natural order were to be realised through the market—a form of meritocratic aristocracy. This libertarian conservatism was already both revolutionary and reactive: it sought the rule of the supposedly capable and fought for dominance over order. Consequently, “everything fixed and stable” that conservatives once sought to preserve began to erode at the hands of conservatives themselves.

Yet, since at least 2016, the world has once again encountered a new iteration of conservatism, one that bears a closer resemblance to the conservatism of the early 20th century, particularly that of the Conservative Revolution. This is a conservatism that seeks to re-enchant the world through mystery, that espouses a belief in nature and champions a return to an extra-real Retrotopia. Once more, we hear pronouncements of the decline of the West, the collapse of liberalism, the allure of the “good old days,” the fall of Rome, and a crisis of masculinity.

Freightened Sailors

Central to conservatism in general, and this new conservatism in particular, is naturalisation. Existing conditions are portrayed as either necessary or the only possible reality. This is a curious assertion, given the significant transformations the world has undergone—the evolution of economic, political, and gender relations. To transform history into nature, the new conservative relies on a range of ideological metaphors. The aim remains to reshape the reality of the world into its ideal image, with the crucial difference that this ideal reality is now situated in the past. A traditional metaphor is the ship—a non-place devoid of history, a realm of natural facts rather than political possibilities. For thinkers like Michael Oakeshott, the ship serves as a metaphor for the realisation that nature and its laws are immutable—an argument against history and, therefore, against change itself. Oakeshott wrote:

“In political activity, men sail a boundless and bottomless sea; there is neither harbour for shelter nor floor for anchorage, neither starting place nor appointed destination. The enterprise consists of keeping afloat on an even keel.”

For the conservative, we are trapped on the open sea, perpetually destined to maintain an imperfect but functioning order. A vessel for which one should be grateful simply for its buoyancy. In this view, the world as it exists is the only conceivable world. For the new conservative, today’s world is a ship that has strayed too far—too far in altering gender relations, too far in expanding public welfare, too far in acknowledging non-heteronormative ways of life. We are, in their eyes, living in an age of late-Roman decadence.

Retrotopia

While utopia, in the sense of “something is missing,” seeks to reimagine and improve the world, retrotopia desires to turn back—to “make someplace great again.” Back to a golden age that is typically left vaguely defined so as not to disrupt the comforting illusion of a supposedly intact past. This is a worldview steeped in nostalgia and a fear of the new. What is being naturalised today is not the present, but a truly-real-once-has-been reality. Instead of history as progress, nature becomes the imperative for regression.

Where utopia is driven by the aspiration to eliminate deficiency, retrotopia is fuelled by the conviction of loss—the loss of identity, of order, of uniqueness. Progress is viewed as a thief of authenticity. Interestingly, the past is treated as the sole possible stable world. The present world exists, but only as a form of late-Roman decadence, perpetually on the verge of collapse.

Kitsch

The prophets of the new conservatism intoxicate their audiences with hollow profundity and the allure of mystery. Rationality is countered with a nebulous sense of authenticity. Certain vaguely defined deep questions and immutable magic must be preserved or promoted. The world is to be imbued with an additional dimension, and the materialism of the left is opposed with empty mysticism. Burke’s sacred veil, behind which mystery unfolds its magic, returns as a blindfold.

A typical argument comes from the philosopher Roger Scruton. According to Scruton, the world as it exists today is the product of centuries of trial and error. We are dealing with answers that have been found to the enduring questions of existence. Social traditions, he argues, are forms of knowledge, containing the remnants of numerous trials and errors, as well as inherited solutions to problems.

This argument manages to reinterpret history as a kind of naturally evolved process. Despite its intoxicating pathos, it is a readily criticised thesis. Why is the trial and error process supposedly complete? Why are we allegedly at the end of history? What precisely are these “enduring questions,” and why should there be only one universal answer? Where does the political element enter the equation? How do we determine what is worth preserving? Are, for instance, centuries-old Hindu widow burnings or slavery part of the answer to humanity’s enduring questions?

Conclusion

Many themes that were once conservative also feature in contemporary conservatism: tradition, order, cohesion, and nature. However, restraint and caution have yielded to the fervour of a conservatism of revolutionary reaction. Mystery and pathos have been reintegrated into the conservative amalgam. Newly added is the naturalisation of the past. Instead of “no experiments” and humility, the new conservative promotes the pathos-driven experiment of journeying into the past.

One could generally argue that this new conservatism is not particularly invested in conserving things. If political ideologies, as Kondylis believed, are merely ideological weapons of interest groups, then the weapons of this new conservatism are essentially blinding political opponents with pessimism, kitsch, and retrotopian notions of authenticity. If all roads of socialism lead to Moscow and all roads of liberalism lead to the supermarket, then all roads of this new conservatism lead to Disneyland. It seeks a return to the point before change, before democracy—back to the absence of alternatives, back to the never-ending, truly real, and ever-present present. It is the revolution of reset.

Justus Seuferle
Justus Seuferle

Justus Seuferle is a political scientist who works for the European Institutions. He writes in a personal capacity.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983c824 240f 477c bc69 697bf625cb93 1 Mind the Gap: Can Europe Afford Its Green and Digital Future?Viktor Skyrman
u421983467b5 5df0 44d2 96fc ba344a10b546 0 Finland’s Austerity Gamble: Tax Cuts for the Rich, Pain for the PoorJussi Systä
u421983467 3f8a 4cbb 9da1 1db7f099aad7 0 The Enduring Appeal of the Hybrid WorkplaceJorge Cabrita
u421983ae 3b0caff337bf 0 Europe’s Euro Ambition: A Risky Bid for “Exorbitant Privilege”Peter Bofinger
u4219834676b2eb11 1 Trump’s Attacks on Academia: Is the U.S. University System Itself to Blame?Bo Rothstein

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity”,

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641