Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Gender, ministers and political appointments

Bonnie Field 24th September 2021

Women fronting governments sends an important signal. Having them in the backrooms of power is however also crucial.

Gender,political appointments,Spain,Sanchez,Zapatero
Junior but not unimportant—Ángeles Moreno Bau, new Spanish secretary of state for international co-operation (Casa de América, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Spain is a world leader in women’s representation in ministerial posts. The cabinet reshuffle which the socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, carried out in July was no exception. Of the 22 current ministers, 14 are women and eight are men. Sánchez stressed that the government would once again be a model for ‘gender parity’.

When Sánchez first assumed office in 2018, he gained international attention for appointing a cabinet which was 65 per cent women. That proportion declined in 2020 when he formed a new coalition government but he still appointed 11 women and 11 men.

Spain first had a cabinet with gender parity in 2004 under Sánchez’s last socialist predecessor, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. And women have led diverse ministries, including defence, housing, economy, equality, finance and education.

Often applauded

Women’s presence in political office is often applauded. It is seen as fair for women to take an equal place in government—making up approximately half of the population—while seeing women in politics, as role models, may inspire other women and girls to become interested and involved. And women may bring to the table distinct interests or perspectives.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

The media, activists and academics pay a great deal of attention to women’s presence in parliaments, in cabinets and, of course, to women serving as chief executives, such as president or prime minister. But if women’s representation in politics matters, we should pay attention to their presence throughout the policy apparatus.

Women’s presence in appointed political positions within the executive—below cabinet ministers—however receives less attention. Yet these officials are important in the policy process.

Ideal laboratory

Given its leading role in women’s representation, Spain provides an ideal laboratory to examine gender and appointed office. I recently investigated the appointments ministers make within their own ministries, to what I term sub-cabinet offices. They include, for example, the secretary of state for international co-operation in the ministry of foreign affairs or the general director of sexual diversity and LGBTQ rights in the ministry of equality.

Each has management responsibilities and a functional role in the ministerial hierarchy and is typically responsible for a particular policy area. They assist the minister throughout policy-making and implementation. Ministers refer to them as their ministerial ‘team’.

At the outset of Sánchez’s first government, over 40 per cent of sub-cabinet appointees were women. This put it ahead of its predecessors in Spain, though still short of parity.

Between 1996 and 2018 men held approximately 74 per cent of sub-cabinet offices on average—almost three out of four. While women’s presence generally increased over the period, men still outnumbered women two to one at the end. On average, women held a smaller share of sub-cabinet offices than of seats in cabinet (see table).

Political appointments of women in Spain (%)

Government    Governing partyStart yearWomen ministersaWomen sub-cabinet officialsb
Aznar IPopular Party (PP), conservative199628.613.4
Aznar IIPopular Party (PP), conservative200018.819.0
Zapatero ISocialist Workers’ Party (PSOE), social-democratic200450.025.5
Zapatero IISocialist Workers’ Party (PSOE), social-democratic200852.934.6
Rajoy IPopular Party (PP), conservative201130.831.6
Rajoy IIPopular Party (PP), conservative201638.531.2
aAuthor’s calculation at the start of the government. bAuthor’s data. Refers to appointments throughout the government’s tenure.

Also, women were more likely to hold sub-cabinet posts in ministries traditionally considered ‘feminine’, such as equality or social services. Fewer women were appointed in ministries with a ‘masculine’ connotation, such as defence or the interior.

Fostering inclusion

An important question is what fosters women’s inclusion. One mechanism political analysts posit is that women may bring other women into politics. Women may value gender diversity more than men, they may have more women in their networks or they may be less apt to rely on gender stereotypes that limit notions of what women can or should do.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

But maybe not. Women may not have the political authority to bring other women in, they may worry about the appearance of bias if they do and indeed they may betray the same biases as men or face similar constraints and incentives.

So did women bring more women along in Spain? The answer is yes and no.

In those 22 years of government appointments, female ministers, as individuals, did not appoint more women than their male counterparts, even when controlling for other confounding factors. At first glance, that might undercut assertions that women’s presence matters to further gender equality.

Yet interviews with 30 former ministers and other qualitative evidence suggest that the gendered political contexts in which ministers made appointments did matter. The gender balance within the political institutions overall fostered or stymied women’s representation. In more gender-balanced contexts, ministers of both genders appointed more women.

Also, incentives matter. When there were strong and explicit party and governmental goals to advance women’s representation, both women and men appointed more women to sub-cabinet office. This occurred particularly during the Zapatero governments. Building on the work of feminists within the socialist party, the prime minister stressed to ministers the importance of appointing women—with demonstrable results.

Practical implications

Spain shows that there are long-running processes at work. Nonetheless, taking into account the gendered nature of political appointments has some more immediate practical implications.

Above all, leadership counts. Chief executives and party leaders can stress the importance of building diverse teams. Some ministers (or others with appointment or gatekeeping power) may have this at the forefront of their minds but others will not. So emphasising it from on high matters.

Ministers also need to keep gender to the fore as they build their teams. Its importance can get lost for practical reasons, such as the pressure of time. It can also get lost due to bias, unconscious or otherwise.

As one minister put it to me, if you don’t ask for women’s CVs, you might not get them.

Bonnie N Field
Bonnie Field

Bonnie N Field is professor of political science at Bentley University, Massachusetts.

You are here: Home / Politics / Gender, ministers and political appointments

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube