Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Political leaders sabotaging corporate sustainability 

Sylvia Obregon Quiroz 8th December 2022

EU member-state governments have flinched at the challenge of enforcing responsible business conduct.

corporate sustainability,due diligence,human rights,directive,companies,business,firms,corporations,
Legally liable: last year a Dutch court ruled that Shell must reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 45 per cent in ten years (Friends of the Earth Netherlands)

Last week, European Union governments reached a fragile deal on the proposed directive on corporate sustainability. The initial aim of this measure was ambitious—to prevent abuse and provide a remedy to victims for harms such as forced labour or oil spills.  

The Council of the EU did close some of the gaps in the European Commission’s proposal. But it signed off on a draft law whose loopholes will allow many powerful companies to evade responsibility for clearcut wrongdoing and undermine the potential to enforce responsible business conduct.

‘Chain of activities’

After much hard negotiation about how far obligations should reach into the value chains of companies, the vague concept of a ‘chain of activities’ emerged. This does not extend to the full spectrum of downstream activities: there will be waivers for companies that sell such products and services as pesticides, other chemicals, security equipment and surveillance technologies. Nor will businesses have to worry at all about how their products or services are used—that includes the finance sector. 

Companies will thus still be able to sell dangerous digital tools, such as Pegasus, to repressive governments, without carrying out human-rights due diligence—they will not be held accountable for the harm to journalists or activists caused by their spyware. Firms could continue to supply to business partners which were implicated in international crimes or work with distributors violating workers’ rights.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

European ministers last week also excluded some fundamental human-rights protections from the proposed law, including children’s rights and rights related to the elimination of discrimination against women. This ignores international standards—while overlooking national due-diligence laws in France, Germany and the Netherlands—and would allow appalling human-rights abuses to be swept under the rug.

Not only is it essential that the directive cover all human rights. The definition of what constitutes an ‘adverse human rights impact’ should not come with conditions that exponentially increase legal uncertainty for affected communities, courts and companies alike.  

For example, as the text stands, damage caused by companies alongside state authorities could continue with impunity. Such abuse is rampant in countries with authoritarian regimes, high corruption and/or armed conflict, where corporations should instead be hypervigilant. Companies enabling and profiting from violations of international humanitarian law, such as Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, must be held accountable.

Huge step backwards

The environmental science meanwhile remains unchanged: we need to do everything in our power to limit global heating to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels and avoid dangerous ecological tipping points. Yet just weeks after talking a big game at COP27, the member-state representatives failed to align environmental requirements with international standards, such as the Paris Agreement, and did not include climate due diligence in the envisaged rules.

Instead, they weakened the already meagre provisions on the environment. If this were to be sustained, companies would not be accountable to courts even if they destroyed entire ecosystems—think of the decades of oil discharges in the Niger delta by a subsidiary of Shell. 

This would be a huge step backwards from existing jurisprudence. In last year’s landmark case against Shell, Dutch judges spelt out that companies have an individual responsibility to combat climate change, because of its severe impacts on human rights.  

Climate change is not only already bringing famine and rising sea levels. Following the severe flooding in Pakistan, a million people are projected to lose their jobs in the garment sector alone. These job losses will exacerbate appalling conditions for those still in work. 

Governments need to get serious about setting a minimum level of acceptable business conduct if we are to have any chance of withstanding the havoc of the climate, nature, energy and health crises. Today’s transition costs are miniscule compared with those of doing nothing.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Countries such as Germany tried to exempt companies from legal liability under the directive if they joined industry initiatives or relied on third-party audits. Leaving aside the well-documented ineffectiveness of social auditors and certifiers in identifying impacts and preventing harm, this would have shifted attention away from what is needed to address the root causes of corporate abuse. The suggestion was rightly rejected but it set negotiators on the path of curtailing liability.  

The current proposal, on the other hand, does nothing to pull down the legal barriers faced by claimants in taking cases against companies, such as high costs, short time limits and limited access to evidence. This makes it more difficult for workers and communities in situations of vulnerability to have their day in court for forced labour or unsafe working conditions. For some governments, business interests come first, protecting people and the planet a distant second.

Race to the bottom

In speech after speech last week, European ministers said they wanted companies to have a level playing-field, so they could rely on common rules. Yet even within that corporate perspective they opted to entrench a ‘race to the bottom’ by leaving inclusion of finance at the discretion of each member state. Financiers, who should be obliged to channel capital towards more sustainable activities, will be able to continue bankrolling fossil fuels, deforestation and human-rights violations without scrutiny.  

Only a few financial institutions and services would be required to carry out human-rights and environmental due-diligence checks over the chains of their clients. This near-exclusion was the result of an intense push by a handful of member states, led by France. France presents itself as a champion of due diligence—it was the first country to adopt a national law in 2017—but it is sabotaging it in Brussels, linked to its ambition to make Paris Europe’s top financial hub in a post-‘Brexit’ world.

If the proposal—supported by Spain, Italy and Slovakia—succeeds in the trilogue negotiations next year, including the European Parliament, many financial companies would face an odd reality: they would need to do due diligence when buying paper for their copy machines, but not when financing a company responsible for a deadly dam collapse such as that in Brumadinho. 

Lowest-common-denominator politics prevailed in Brussels last week, leaving everyone in the council chamber, as the Czech presidency put it, ‘equally unhappy’. But it would be workers, consumers and communities who would get the short end of the stick. 

Governments that understand that the economy of the 21st century can’t be built on exploitation and destruction will need to push harder to protect human rights, the environment and the climate. The European Parliament will also need to raise the bar.

Sylvia Obregon Quiroz
Sylvia Obregon Quiroz

Sylvia Obregon Quiroz is a policy officer at the European Coalition for Corporate Justice.

You are here: Home / Economy / Political leaders sabotaging corporate sustainability 

Most Popular Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse

Most Recent Posts

EU social agenda,social investment,social protection EU social agenda beyond 2024—no time to wasteFrank Vandenbroucke
pension reform,Germany,Lindner Pension reform in Germany—a market solution?Fabian Mushövel and Nicholas Barr
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
artists,cultural workers Europe’s stars must shine for artists and creativesIsabelle Van de Gejuchte
transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube