Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Setting human-rights due diligence back on track

Oliver Roethig 15th November 2022

A carve-out for the finance sector would water down the ambition of the EU’s human-rights due-diligence legislation.

finance,pension funds,due diligence,human rights,companies,European Commission,directive
In January the French multinational TotalEnergies said it would withdraw from Myanmar, almost a year after the military coup, admitting the impact of pressure from its shareholders and civil-society organisations (R Bociaga / shutterstock.com)

When in April 2020, Didier Reynders, the European Commission member with the justice brief, promised a legislative initiative on mandatory obligations for European Union companies on human-rights due diligence, it sent a positive signal that business would be required to assume global responsibility in tackling associated violations. When the commission’s proposed directive however materialised in February this year, it was riddled with missed opportunities to deliver on this mission.

For too long, the global operations and value chains from which multinationals draw their profits have been a wild west. Companies have been allowed to overlay human-rights abuses with complexity, obscurity and soft ‘corporate social responsibility’ pledges, without accepting real accountability for the conditions of their workers, and those of their suppliers, around the world.

Ending corporations’ unilateral oversight over human-rights due diligence is key. For the adoption of legislation to truly shift practices to safeguard human rights, including workers’ rights, we must embed accountability throughout the process by creating a seat at the table for those representing rightsholders—including trade unions at national and international levels.

This must be the case for all companies—the proposed directive would only cover large enterprises—and for all sectors. Yet the proposal includes several clauses limiting the human-rights due-diligence responsibilities of financial corporations, as the finance-sector trade unions which UNI Global Union represents have highlighted.


Become part of our Community of Thought Leaders


Get fresh perspectives delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for our newsletter to receive thought-provoking opinion articles and expert analysis on the most pressing political, economic and social issues of our time. Join our community of engaged readers and be a part of the conversation.

Sign up here

Own goal

Finance has a catalytic effect across the economy. To grow to their current size, all multinational companies have needed it. Through these links, finance has an influence in setting standards of company practice, which must not be overlooked.

While financial relationships vary, this influence may stem from privileged access to the operations of multinational clients and investees or ownership rights which offer a shareholder voice and, ultimately, the ability to reward good behaviour or punish bad through financing decisions. That is why the attempt to exempt finance companies from full human-rights due-diligence would represent not merely an opportunity missed but an own goal.

There are three key flaws. The latest draft of the EU legislation excludes finance from the list of high-impact sectors, absolving many smaller and often less visible financial corporations from due-diligence obligations. Remaining larger corporations would be required to undertake a due-diligence assessment only once in the duration of a contract. And this assessment would be limited to large multinational clients, excluding their own value chains.

Increasingly acknowledged

Finance’s impact on human rights is hugely significant and it should be classified as high. The commission acknowledges that high-impact sectors should be those for which the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has developed specific due-diligence guidelines. In fact the OECD has developed not one but two sets of guidance for the financial sector—covering institutional investors and corporate lending.

Finance has itself increasingly acknowledged the importance of ‘environmental, social and governance’ considerations. Front-runners in the sector have gone further to address their impacts on people and the planet, including through leading institutions adopting practices based on human-rights due diligence.

Only requiring due-diligence assessments once during a contract ignores evolving human-rights risks. Myanmar provides an illuminating example. Two years ago, investing in the country would have presented manageable risks. But since the February 2021 coup, blatant human-rights violations have become rife and UNI has urged banks to cut ties with the military junta. Yet the draft directive would allow prior investment decisions in such a scenario to retain a due-diligence green light.

Finally, restricting due-diligence requirements to direct investments or contracts with large corporate clients would create a vast exemption which would limit financial due diligence to the tip of the iceberg of human-rights risks. This would be in contrast to explicit guidance on the sector from the OECD and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as the UN Principles for Responsible Investment. Ensuring the client was merely a holding company could confine due diligence to that legal shell, rather than embracing operations actually taking place in a company subsidiary—let alone those affecting workers in outsourced companies or along the value chain.

Banks and insurance companies already have a highly efficient infrastructure for quality assessments, on risk and return, when investing in companies. In fact this is their primary role. Integrating an additional component is perfectly feasible if human rights become mandated as a priority.


Support Progressive Ideas: Become a Social Europe Member!


Support independent publishing and progressive ideas by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month. You can help us create more high-quality articles, podcasts and videos that challenge conventional thinking and foster a more informed and democratic society. Join us in our mission - your support makes all the difference!

Become a Social Europe Member

Core consideration

Indeed, in some sectors of finance, human rights are already a core consideration. Pension funds have been leading the way. In the Netherlands, pension funds broke new ground in 2018 when they signed a covenant with trade unions, other civil-society organisations and the Dutch government committing to respect human and labour rights.

Rather than acting as a barrier to delivering workers’ pensions, respecting human rights in investment processes supports pension funds: human-rights due diligence provides a ‘canary in the coalmine’, potentially highlighting other areas of poor governance where failings are found. And this is not just about pension funds: more than 100 investors with $4 trillion in assets under management are part of the Investor Alliance for Human Rights, which also makes the case for serious due-diligence legislation.

The role of finance corporations here is not to bear all responsibility for action on the ground but to ensure that multinationals have addressed their own responsibilities. While the reach of finance is vast, by taking a risk-based approach, as the international standards foresee, finance’s human-rights due-diligence actions can be prioritised to address the most severe risks to people, making the process entirely proportionate and feasible. Ending human-rights abuses is worth a minor administrative burden.

Gatekeeper role

Unions are by no means alone in rejecting the proposed carve-out of finance in the draft directive. The UN Principles for Responsible Investment, the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, a coalition of nongovernmental organisations, the experts Shift on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the European Coalition for Corporate Justice and many more have come out emphatically against it.

Profiting from human-rights abuses can no longer be accepted. To deliver the transformative promise of human-rights due diligence, we need all hands on deck—not business as usual. To get there, the finance sector’s gatekeeper role must be activated.

Pics 2
Oliver Roethig

Oliver Roethig heads UNI Europa, the European service workers’ union.

You are here: Home / Economy / Setting human-rights due diligence back on track

Most Popular Posts

Russia,information war Russia is winning the information warAiste Merfeldaite
Nanterre,police Nanterre and the suburbs: the lid comes offJoseph Downing
Russia,nuclear Russia’s dangerous nuclear consensusAna Palacio
Belarus,Lithuania A tale of two countries: Belarus and LithuaniaThorvaldur Gylfason and Eduard Hochreiter
retirement,Finland,ageing,pension,reform Late retirement: possible for many, not for allKati Kuitto

Most Recent Posts

Nagorno-Karabakh,European Union,EU,Azerbaijan,Armenia Azerbaijan exploits vacuum on Nagorno-KarabakhGeorge Meneshian
Abuse,work,workplace,violence Abuse at work: who bears the brunt?Agnès Parent-Thirion and Viginta Ivaskaite-Tamosiune
Ukraine,fatigue Ukraine’s cause: momentum is diminishingStefan Wolff and Tetyana Malyarenko
Vienna,social housing Vienna social-housing model: celebrated but misusedGabu Heindl
social democracy,nation-state Social democracy versus the nativist rightJan Zielonka

Other Social Europe Publications

strategic autonomy Strategic autonomy
Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 scaled 1 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound Talks: does Europe have the skills it needs for a changing economy?

In this episode of the Eurofound Talks podcast, Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound’s research manager, Tina Weber, its senior research manager, Gijs van Houten, and Giovanni Russo, senior expert at CEDEFOP (The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training), about Europe’s skills challenges and what can be done to help workers and businesses adapt to future skills demands.

Listen where you get your podcasts, or for free, by clicking on the link below


LISTEN HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The summer issue of the Progressive Post magazine by FEPS is out!

The Special Coverage of this new edition is dedicated to the importance of biodiversity, not only as a good in itself but also for the very existence of humankind. We need a paradigm change in the mostly utilitarian relation humans have with nature.

In this issue, we also look at the hazards of unregulated artificial intelligence, explore the shortcomings of the EU's approach to migration and asylum management, and analyse the social downside of the EU's current ethnically-focused Roma policy.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI European Collective Bargaining Report 2022 / 2023

With real wages falling by 4 per cent in 2022, workers in the European Union suffered an unprecedented loss in purchasing power. The reason for this was the rapid increase in consumer prices, behind which nominal wage growth fell significantly. Meanwhile, inflation is no longer driven by energy import prices, but by domestic factors. The increased profit margins of companies are a major reason for persistent inflation. In this difficult environment, trade unions are faced with the challenge of securing real wages—and companies have the responsibility of making their contribution to returning to the path of political stability by reducing excess profits.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The future of remote work

The 12 chapters collected in this volume provide a multidisciplinary perspective on the impact and the future trajectories of remote work, from the nexus between the location from where work is performed and how it is performed to how remote locations may affect the way work is managed and organised, as well as the applicability of existing legislation. Additional questions concern remote work’s environmental and social impact and the rapidly changing nature of the relationship between work and life.


AVAILABLE HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube