Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Setting human-rights due diligence back on track

Oliver Roethig 15th November 2022

A carve-out for the finance sector would water down the ambition of the EU’s human-rights due-diligence legislation.

finance,pension funds,due diligence,human rights,companies,European Commission,directive
In January the French multinational TotalEnergies said it would withdraw from Myanmar, almost a year after the military coup, admitting the impact of pressure from its shareholders and civil-society organisations (R Bociaga / shutterstock.com)

When in April 2020, Didier Reynders, the European Commission member with the justice brief, promised a legislative initiative on mandatory obligations for European Union companies on human-rights due diligence, it sent a positive signal that business would be required to assume global responsibility in tackling associated violations. When the commission’s proposed directive however materialised in February this year, it was riddled with missed opportunities to deliver on this mission.

For too long, the global operations and value chains from which multinationals draw their profits have been a wild west. Companies have been allowed to overlay human-rights abuses with complexity, obscurity and soft ‘corporate social responsibility’ pledges, without accepting real accountability for the conditions of their workers, and those of their suppliers, around the world.

Ending corporations’ unilateral oversight over human-rights due diligence is key. For the adoption of legislation to truly shift practices to safeguard human rights, including workers’ rights, we must embed accountability throughout the process by creating a seat at the table for those representing rightsholders—including trade unions at national and international levels.

This must be the case for all companies—the proposed directive would only cover large enterprises—and for all sectors. Yet the proposal includes several clauses limiting the human-rights due-diligence responsibilities of financial corporations, as the finance-sector trade unions which UNI Global Union represents have highlighted.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Own goal

Finance has a catalytic effect across the economy. To grow to their current size, all multinational companies have needed it. Through these links, finance has an influence in setting standards of company practice, which must not be overlooked.

While financial relationships vary, this influence may stem from privileged access to the operations of multinational clients and investees or ownership rights which offer a shareholder voice and, ultimately, the ability to reward good behaviour or punish bad through financing decisions. That is why the attempt to exempt finance companies from full human-rights due-diligence would represent not merely an opportunity missed but an own goal.

There are three key flaws. The latest draft of the EU legislation excludes finance from the list of high-impact sectors, absolving many smaller and often less visible financial corporations from due-diligence obligations. Remaining larger corporations would be required to undertake a due-diligence assessment only once in the duration of a contract. And this assessment would be limited to large multinational clients, excluding their own value chains.

Increasingly acknowledged

Finance’s impact on human rights is hugely significant and it should be classified as high. The commission acknowledges that high-impact sectors should be those for which the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has developed specific due-diligence guidelines. In fact the OECD has developed not one but two sets of guidance for the financial sector—covering institutional investors and corporate lending.

Finance has itself increasingly acknowledged the importance of ‘environmental, social and governance’ considerations. Front-runners in the sector have gone further to address their impacts on people and the planet, including through leading institutions adopting practices based on human-rights due diligence.

Only requiring due-diligence assessments once during a contract ignores evolving human-rights risks. Myanmar provides an illuminating example. Two years ago, investing in the country would have presented manageable risks. But since the February 2021 coup, blatant human-rights violations have become rife and UNI has urged banks to cut ties with the military junta. Yet the draft directive would allow prior investment decisions in such a scenario to retain a due-diligence green light.

Finally, restricting due-diligence requirements to direct investments or contracts with large corporate clients would create a vast exemption which would limit financial due diligence to the tip of the iceberg of human-rights risks. This would be in contrast to explicit guidance on the sector from the OECD and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as the UN Principles for Responsible Investment. Ensuring the client was merely a holding company could confine due diligence to that legal shell, rather than embracing operations actually taking place in a company subsidiary—let alone those affecting workers in outsourced companies or along the value chain.

Banks and insurance companies already have a highly efficient infrastructure for quality assessments, on risk and return, when investing in companies. In fact this is their primary role. Integrating an additional component is perfectly feasible if human rights become mandated as a priority.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Core consideration

Indeed, in some sectors of finance, human rights are already a core consideration. Pension funds have been leading the way. In the Netherlands, pension funds broke new ground in 2018 when they signed a covenant with trade unions, other civil-society organisations and the Dutch government committing to respect human and labour rights.

Rather than acting as a barrier to delivering workers’ pensions, respecting human rights in investment processes supports pension funds: human-rights due diligence provides a ‘canary in the coalmine’, potentially highlighting other areas of poor governance where failings are found. And this is not just about pension funds: more than 100 investors with $4 trillion in assets under management are part of the Investor Alliance for Human Rights, which also makes the case for serious due-diligence legislation.

The role of finance corporations here is not to bear all responsibility for action on the ground but to ensure that multinationals have addressed their own responsibilities. While the reach of finance is vast, by taking a risk-based approach, as the international standards foresee, finance’s human-rights due-diligence actions can be prioritised to address the most severe risks to people, making the process entirely proportionate and feasible. Ending human-rights abuses is worth a minor administrative burden.

Gatekeeper role

Unions are by no means alone in rejecting the proposed carve-out of finance in the draft directive. The UN Principles for Responsible Investment, the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, a coalition of nongovernmental organisations, the experts Shift on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the European Coalition for Corporate Justice and many more have come out emphatically against it.

Profiting from human-rights abuses can no longer be accepted. To deliver the transformative promise of human-rights due diligence, we need all hands on deck—not business as usual. To get there, the finance sector’s gatekeeper role must be activated.

Pics 2
Oliver Roethig

Oliver Roethig heads UNI Europa, the European service workers’ union.

You are here: Home / Economy / Setting human-rights due diligence back on track

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube