Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Social pillar Action Plan—longer on aspiration

by Lukas Hochscheidt on 9th March 2021 @LukiHochscheidt

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

The Action Plan shows ambition on poverty, employment and training. But the concrete measures are not (yet) up to the task.

Action Plan,Social Pillar,European Pillar of Social Rights
Lukas Hochscheidt

In November 2017, the main European Union institutions and the member states proclaimed the European Pillar of Social Rights in Göteborg, Sweden. Three and a half years on, the European Commission last week published an Action Plan to implement the 20 principles of the pillar.

Although planned long before the Covid-19 outbreak, the action plan couldn’t be more timely: one year into the pandemic, millions of Europeans live in deprivation and despair. People have lost their jobs or become ‘inactive’, women have seen their burden of unpaid care heavily increase and young people are at risk of becoming a ‘lockdown generation’.

The Action Plan is meant to be the core of the current commission’s social and labour-market agenda. From the beginning of her mandate, the commission president, Ursula von der Leyen—a former minister of labour and social affairs in Germany—highlighted her strong ambition on upward social convergence and an ‘economy that works for people’.

Three targets

Expectations of the Action Plan were thus high. Its cornerstones are three headline targets, to be achieved by 2030—the timescale of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.

First, the commission seeks to reduce the number of people at risk of poverty by 15 million, of which at least five million should be children. Secondly, the employment rate of those aged 20 to 64 should increase to 78 per cent, from 72.5 per cent in the third quarter of 2020—including a reduction of young people not in employment, education or training to 9 per cent, from 12.6 per cent in 2019. And 60 per cent of the workforce should participate in training each year (up from 37 per cent in 2016), bringing the share of adults with basic digital skills up to 80 per cent.

Cutting-edge thinking straight to your inbox

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

While the targets for employment and training are bold and clear, that for reduction of poverty lacks ambition. Between 2010 and 2020, the EU aimed to reduce the number at risk of poverty by 20 million, but fell well short—and the pace at which it is envisaged social exclusion will fall in the coming decade has been accordingly attenuated. Given that in 2019—before the Covid-19 pandemic—in absolute terms 91 million Europeans were at risk of poverty, the union should be raising its horizons rather than trimming its targets.

One of the key tools to monitor achievement will be a revamped Social Scoreboard. From a trade union perspective, adding new indicators to the scoreboard is indeed essential: coverage of collective agreements and union density in the member states are both absent from it. The Action Plan however contains no details on how the scoreboard will be revised or who will be involved.

Expectations not met

Clear targets and their monitoring through the Social Scoreboard provide a framework for the implementation of the social pillar, yet an Action Plan should first and foremost convince by concrete actions. In this regard, the commission has not met those high expectations.

Among the most promising proposals are a recommendation on Effective Active Support for Employment (published along with the Action Plan) and a reform of EU competition law to protect collective agreements for some groups of self-employed, notably formally self-employed platform workers. Also proposed are reform of European public-procurement guidelines, to foster innovation and socially-responsible procurement, and exploration of a ‘European Social Security Pass’. The latter could allow for digital interactions between mobile citizens and national authorities, to improve the portability of social-security entitlements.


Please help us improve public policy debates


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house or big advertising partners. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you. You can support us by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month.

Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Apart from these initiatives, many important ‘proposals’ of the Action Plan are however projects already up and running. The framework directive on minimum wages—presented as key—was announced in autumn 2020, and the legislative proposals on working conditions in the platform economy and banning hazardous chemicals are already subject to consultation with the social partners. Other proposals, such as the evaluation of the European Labour Authority and the update of the New Industrial Strategy, are merely follow-up measures.

Major absence

The major absence in the Action Plan is the announced initiative on an unemployment reinsurance scheme for the eurozone—widely recognised as essential to cope with the endemic challenge of asymmetric shocks to single-currency member states. While the commission intended to come up with a proposal in the first half of 2021, this topic is not considered a priority any more. Although the commissioner for jobs and social rights, Nicolas Schmit, insists that unemployment reinsurance is still on the agenda, it is telling that the commission decided to omit it from the Action Plan.

It is equally disappointing that the commission should remain unclear on the future of the SURE employment-support mechanism, set up in spring 2020 to finance short-time work schemes in the member states during the pandemic. While an evaluation of SURE is mentioned, there is no commitment to a further iteration. Given that 90 per cent of the loans covered by SURE have already been allocated to member states, yet the recession is far from over, European firms and workers need to know whether they can count on the EU to support employment effectively in the future.

It is now up to member states and national stakeholders to build on these proposals and elevate their ambition. Although the social pillar does not provide for directly justiciable rights, its declaration in 2017 initiated an obligation under international law. Its principles must be thoroughly incorporated in European secondary legislation and, eventually, turned into actual social rights for European citizens.

The commission’s Action Plan marks an important step in the process but must not be the last word. The European Social Summit in Porto on May 7th and 8th will be an opportunity to put new and bold proposals (back) on the table to make the internal market fairer. The fight for a more social Europe is far from being won.

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
Home ・ Society ・ Social pillar Action Plan—longer on aspiration

Filed Under: Society

About Lukas Hochscheidt

Lukas Hochscheidt is a research assistant in the Department of European and International Trade Union Policy at the German Trade Union Confederation.

Partner Ads

Most Popular Posts

global labour market A simul­taneously expanding and shrinking world Branko Milanovic
decarbonisation,energy transition Europe’s de­carbonisation challenge? ‘Wir schaffen das’ Adam Tooze
integrated review Lost an empire, not found a role Paul Mason
Uber v Aslam,UK Supreme Court Putting the brakes on the spread of indecent work Ruth Dukes and Wolfgang Streeck
debt cancellation,cancellation of debt,ECB Cancelling a debt we already own has a false allure Anne-Laure Delatte, Michel Husson, Benjamin Lemoine, Éric Monnet, Raul Sampognaro, Bruno Tinel and Sébastien Villemot

Other Social Europe Publications

RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020
Corporate taxation in a globalised era
The transformation of work
The coronavirus crisis and the welfare state

Social Europe Publishing book

With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Renewing labour relations in the German meat industry: an end to 'organised irresponsibility'?

Over the course of 2020, repeated outbreaks of Covid-19 in a number of large German meat-processing plants led to renewed public concern about the longstanding labour abuses in this industry. New legislation providing for enhanced inspection on health and safety, together with a ban on contract work and limitations on the use of temporary agency employees, holds out the prospect of a profound change in employment practices and labour relations in the meat industry. Changes in the law are not sufficient, on their own, to ensure decent working conditions, however. There is also a need to re-establish the previously high level of collective-bargaining coverage in the industry, underpinned by an industry-wide collective agreement extended by law to cover the entire sector.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Social protection during the pandemic: freelancers in the creative industries

This working paper identifies some key areas of policy intervention for advancing socially sustainable and fair solutions for freelancers working in the creative industries, who are among those who have suffered the most from the economic fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic. In particular, the authors focus on those who work entirely on their own account, without employees (ie the ‘solo self-employed’), and who undertake project- or task-based work on a fixed-term basis.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

#Care4Care!

It took us a global pandemic to realise that we depend on care. Despite all the clapping from the balconies, care workers continue to work in precarious and vulnerable conditions. Women, who represent 70% of the care workforce, continue to suffer from a severe lack of recognition for both their paid and unpaid care work. It’s time for a care revolution! It’s time to #Care4Care! The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS), together with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), has been intensively working since 2019 to monitor the EU gender equality policy agenda through a progressive lens focusing particularly on its care dimensions.


FIND OUT MORE HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards