Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Taking Europe’s pandemic pulse

by Juan Menéndez-Valdés on 7th October 2020 @JuanMenendezEF

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

A tentative growth in trust shows Covid-19 has not yet torn the social fabric of Europe.

social fabric
Juan Menendez-Valdes

As Europe faces into what appears to be a second wave of the pandemic, concern is mounting about the evolution and impact of the disease, with rising infections, hospitalisations and deaths. There is also a growing focus on the repercussions for the economy, the labour market and the way we shall live and work—or not. 

How we respond to these extraordinary times will shape the future of our societies for decades. Understanding the lived experiences of citizens is critical, to develop the most relevant and effective policies to tackle the fallout from the pandemic. 

Eurofound’s ‘Living, working and Covid-19’ survey does just that. Drawing on experiences from the initial outbreak in the spring through to the summer, the results show, as might have been expected, an improvement as lockdown was lifted across the European Union and the economy gradually reopened. There was an upturn in optimism, trust increased at the EU and national levels, feelings of job insecurity declined and the self-employed reported better prospects.

Less work

Despite these improvements, however, reduced working time—and suspension of contracts—continued. This is of concern, with one in three reporting reduced working time in July (albeit down from half in April). Yet it arguably validates the crucial role short-time-working schemes are playing in mitigating the impact of the pandemic on labour markets.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

This buffer has not however been able to stop the increase in unemployment. This has been comparatively high in some groups, such as the self-employed, and in some countries with less robust labour markets strongly hit by the pandemic, such as Spain.

Social shocks tend to hit unemployed people harder anyway, especially in crises such as this. They report lower resilience and more difficulty in making ends meet (twice as hard as for those in employment), while two out of five report feeling left out of society.

Others experiencing comparative disadvantage, such as young people and women generally, are among those most adversely affected by the socio-economic implications of Covid-19. There are also less obvious groups, such as the self-employed and middle-aged cohort (34 to 49)—traditionally perceived as comparatively better off—who report concerns, not only about employment but future job security.

More telework

For those remaining in employment, teleworking continues to be the most relevant change. Unimaginable on this scale just a decade ago, teleworking seems to have been of benefit overall, in ensuring business continuity and allowing workers to adjust and remain active. As the economy reopened partially in July, half of Eurofound’s respondents were still reporting teleworking at least occasionally, with one third continuing to work exclusively from home. Moreover, with three out of four employees indicating that they would like to telework in the future, at least occasionally—the preferred option a mix between remote working and workplace presence—employment relations are likely to be transformed.

Policy discussions have already started at national and EU levels, on the part of public authorities and within social dialogue, to address the opportunities and challenges the situation offers. Company practices will need to adapt and organisations will need to learn new ways of operating. 

Anyone doubting the importance of telework in our new reality should consider the fact that around 40 per cent of paid hours worked by employees have been performed from home during the pandemic. Telework is no longer just a workplace issue: it is an important macro-economic consideration, with potentially large impacts on regional convergence, the urban-rural relationship and Europe’s place in the global economy. It opens up huge opportunities for society and the economy at large—for example, the (re-)development of rural areas is now a real possibility as places to live and work, with the appropriate infrastructure.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Yet not all jobs are ‘teleworkable’ and issues remain. Fewer than half of employees teleworking report having received the required equipment from their employer. Many are working in their free time, potentially fading further the blurring boundaries between work and family life. And while support from management and colleagues for them remains, they do report feeling more isolated, their work less useful—important aspects of job quality.

Trust bellwether

The rapid changes under way in the workplace, economy and society can also be gauged in levels of institutional trust. This is a bellwether of the functioning of our democracies and the health of our societies and some changes have been evident between the previous trawl of opinion in April and July. 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, those who have suffered the impact of the crisis but have also benefited from swift policy reaction and financial support report higher trust. This speaks to the importance of establishing the right safety-nets for those in situations of vulnerability, to ensure they are not left behind.

Trust in the EU seems to have largely recovered, having plummeted in April—particularly in the countries hit first by the outbreak, such as France and Italy. This may reflect a recognition of how solidarity to an extent trumped the initial tensions at European level, with the implementation of the SURE initiative to support employment and the longer-term recovery plan, Next Generation EU. 

This positive trend is not, however, uniform across member states and trust in national governments meanwhile declined in most countries. In this fragile world citizens’ trust directly reflects their perception of solidarity and fairness in a union which seeks to ‘leave no one behind’. As the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said in her State of the Union address, ‘we showed what is possible when we trust each other and trust our European institutions …. to not only repair and recover for the here and now, but to shape a better way of living for the world of tomorrow’.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Taking Europe’s pandemic pulse

Filed Under: Politics

About Juan Menéndez-Valdés

Juan Menéndez-Valdés is the director of Eurofound, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Prior to assuming the position in 2010, he was the head of employment, immigration, education and training policies at the Spanish Confederation of Employers’ Organisation (CEOE) and programme manager for guidance and training at the Spanish National Institute for Employment (INEM).

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards