Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

‘Veggie burger’ ban: bad for consumers and climate

by Jytte Guteland on 20th October 2020 @JytteGuteland

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

The meat industry wants terms such as ‘veggie burger’ banned. This is less about confusion, more about competition.

veggie burger, vegetarian, vegan
Jytte Guteland

This week the European Parliament will vote on the common agricultural policy. We want a sustainable CAP, aligned with the Paris agreement and the European Climate Law, on which the parliament recently adopted a position. Judging from what´s on the table, however, we are far from it. 

One small aspect of the CAP could have a big impact. It’s the issue of whether to ban ‘meaty’ terms—such as ‘burger and ‘sausage’—for vegetarian products, and further restrict marketing of plant-based alternatives to dairy.

Dietary choices

Products such as ‘veggie burger’ or ‘plant based-steak’ have in some cases been on the market for decades. Consumers are familiar with these names, which help to support their dietary choices. 

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Current European Union denominations and labelling rules, as laid out in the Food Information to Consumers Regulation, are clear and adequate. Additional restrictions would harm the competitiveness of plant-based food producers—a growing contributor to European jobs and investment—which have built brands, product portfolios, intellectual property rights and strong customer bases on these familiar terms.  

Rather than genuinely caring about consumers making the right choices, it seems the meat industry is worried about the competition from plant-based products. As a frequent consumer of the latter, it never crossed my mind that the names could be confusing. 

In fact, the evidence indicates consumers are not misled by plant-based products. In one survey, 95 per cent of German consumers reported that they never bought the wrong product because they confused plant-based with animal-based food.  

There would be no problem in adding descriptions or qualifiers to make the origin of the products even clearer—this reflects current market practice in any case. It would not involve the European Parliament taking away product names with which European citizens are already familiar. A recent survey by the BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation, found that over 68 per cent of consumers from 11 European countries supported ‘meaty’ names for plant-based food products, as long as they were clearly labelled as plant-based or vegetarian.

Nearly 100,000 people across Europe have signed petitions opposing these proposals. A diverse range of civil-society organisations has also made clear their opposition.

Firm position

The European Parliament recently adopted its position on the European Climate Law, cornerstone of the European Green Deal. As rapporteur I was happy that we obtained a commitment to a 60 per cent reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions by 2030, compared with 1990. With this target the parliament takes a firm position to bring Europe’s climate efforts more in line with science and our citizens, who want Europe to reach the climate-neutrality objective and to respect the Paris agreement.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Food has a major role to play in reaching this target—so the Farm to Fork Strategy is at the heart of the Green Deal. Agriculture will have to contribute considerably to the 2050 and upcoming 2030 climate targets. It is responsible for 10.3 per cent of the EU’s GHG emissions and nearly 70 per cent of these come from the animal sector. 

The Farm to Fork Strategy aims to achieve a sustainable food system that can bring environmental, health and social benefits, offer economic gains and ensure that a recovery from the pandemic puts Europe on to a sustainable path. The strategy includes plans to promote plant-based diets, to reduce not only the risk of life-threatening diseases but also the environmental impact of the food system.

Restrictive labelling would not only hinder the development of the plant-based industry. It would go counter to the objectives of the strategy and the Sustainable Healthy Diets: Guiding Principles document jointly issued by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization.

Encouraging trends

It should not only be up to us as individuals to save the climate: the sectors and countries that emit the most must also contribute the most. But we need to embrace and encourage trends that make it easier for consumers to make environmentally friendly choices. Europeans are becoming increasingly conscious of the environmental, ethical and health impacts of their diet and are starting to change their food consumption accordingly. The number of vegetarians, vegans and ‘flexitarians’ is increasing.

EU annual meat consumption is projected to decline by 1.1 kilogrammes per capita by 2030. The number of flexitarians is increasing across all generations. In particular, the plant-based market share of the total ‘meat’ market tends to be relatively high in western Europe: in the Netherlands and Belgium it is 11 per cent, in Germany 9 per cent, in Italy 7 per cent, and in Sweden 5 per cent.

Banning veggie burgers and other ‘meaty’ names would risk making the European Parliament appear distant from European citizens. We should not confiscate these names for plant-based products, in the mistaken belief it would show solidarity with farmers or producers in the meat sector or even a respect for tradition. The status quo is fair.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ ‘Veggie burger’ ban: bad for consumers and climate

Filed Under: Economy

About Jytte Guteland

Jytte Guteland MEP is co-ordinator for the Socialists and Democrats of the European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. She is currently rapporteur for the EU Climate Law.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards