Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Get ready for the X-day week!

Enzo Weber 26th July 2023

The clunky debate over four versus five days should be replaced by a focus on flexibility and individal autonomy.

X-day week,working hours
Worker-driven flexibility, in lieu of ‘presentism’, favours autonomy and work-life balance while potentially enhancing commitment (GaudiLab/shutterstock.com)

Why should five days of work per week actually be the best option? This question is being asked more and more. The shock of the pandemic showed that it is possible to work differently.

In many countries, single-earner households have become a thing of the past. When both partners are active in the labour market, other models are needed. Labour is scarce, in Germany more than at any other time since the Wirtschaftswunder (economic miracle)—and Germany is not alone. This makes it easier to have one’s wishes heard than in times of mass unemployment.

Today, especially the younger generations want to work less and have more leisure time—that’s what we often hear. Yet this may not be true: representative survey results in Germany show that, on average, nowadays people do not want to work shorter hours. For men, the desired working hours have decreased but only slightly, by one to two hours per week. After a temporary increase since, this would simply take us back to the 1990s.

Accordingly, surveys have found that only a small minority of full-time employees would prefer to switch to a four-day week. This however becomes a clear majority if the salary is not reduced. This is unsurprising, since working four days a week for the same salary would mean an hourly wage premium of 25 per cent.

Wage compensation

Such wage compensation would not be necessary if, as in the Belgian model, the working hours of the fifth day were distributed over the remaining four. Together with breaks and commuting times, however, this would add up to well over ten hours per day. Such long days are not conducive to performance and nursery opening hours do not accommodate them.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



This working-time model would be likely to result in care work being shouldered even more one-sidedly by women. It seems unlikely to gain widespread acceptance.

With an actual reduction of working hours, full wage compensation could only be generated if hourly productivity increased accordingly. One could definitely achieve higher productivity with shorter working time: productivity as well as health can suffer when hours are too long. Research however indicates that working time is not yet excessive in a standard German 38-hour full-time week.

Nevertheless, pilot studies, such as those in Iceland or most recently in the United Kingdom, suggest that full performance could be achieved after all if working times were reduced to four days. One should though look carefully at what conclusions can be drawn from these results.

Additional stress

Participation in such studies is usually voluntary. Those already positively disposed towards a four-day week who see good possibilities for implementation in their company may thus be more likely to participate. Moreover, other measures come in train: organisational changes, more efficient processes, new technologies. All these can bring progress but the same results would be possible with five or three days a week, instead of four.

In addition, workload becomes more intense if full performance is to be achieved with one less day. This could lead to additional stress, with social communication typically limited. Such potential negative side-effects would however only become apparent in the medium term, after the study period.

Finally, the four-day debate often seems rather one-sided. A bus driver, for example, cannot drive more quickly for four days so as to take off the fifth. The same applies to many other professions requiring a certain amount of time to be covered—from nursing to sales.

Pilot studies can teach us a lot about how to initiate change. We should not however derive from the pilot studies the expectation that a mere reduction in working hours would improve performance across the board.

Flexible working

While people today do not necessarily want to work shorter hours than they used to, many would still like to reduce their working hours—today as much as in the past. In most cases, a reduction by a whole day is not desired but still a large group (although not the majority) would be interested in some kind of reduction. Yet some others would like to increase their working hours.

All this is related to numerous factors which can change over the lifecourse, such as care work and professional autonomy. Preferences change for those who are younger and those who are raising a family—and older people often want to shorten working hours too. Accordingly, companies are successful above all in their attempts to retain employees who are still entitled to a pension by offering shorter, more flexible working hours.

In view of the staff shortages and the imminent demographic shrinkage, it does not make any obvious sense from the employer’s point of view to reduce working hours in general. But offering flexible reductions (and extension options) can actually be profitable for employers.

Part-time and full-time work are still quite separate, especially in Germany. Those who go part-time rarely return to full-time. But better career, earnings and further-training opportunities are available in full-time employment.

Greater permeability could avoid part-time work becoming a trap and make better use of women’s potential in career development, not least because there could be greater reliance on fathers, who could temporarily work shorter hours without fear of career setbacks. Such working conditions could also be used as a locational advantage, since countries such as Germany are increasingly dependent on attracting and retaining immigrants.

The X-day week

So what about the four-day week? Yes, absolutely—for those who want it. But anyone who prefers to work five days should be able to, and those who prefer to work three days should be allowed that too. Anyone who works more will also earn more, but professional development should work equally well in all configurations. So get ready for the X-day week!

The X-day model offers employees the opportunity, individually and over the course of their lives, to adjust their working hours and how these are distributed across the week. For companies, this flexibility can be a challenge—to meet individual requests and at the same time function successfully, in terms of organisation and co-operation. But it is worth it, because it means employees are satisfied with their work situation, especially where they can influence their working hours themselves.

This should be cleverly combined with opportunities for mobile work, which has leapt forward since the pandemic. This requires transparent distribution of responsibility, regulated communication and feedback, clear mutual expectations and defined limits.

All this would be a progressive labour politics with a future. Company and sectoral collective agreements would be the right means to implement such a policy.

Involving employees

Employers are well advised to invest in the satisfaction of their people. According to new findings, company engagement and commitment to work have declined in Germany. But here too, the conventional wisdom is not correct: this is not due to ‘Generation Z’, whose members betray comparatively high values, and it preceded Covid-19.

Nor is there any such animal as the good-humoured Quiet Quitter, who still puts so much effort into his work that he does not break down and can continue to work energetically and with motivation: less commitment and engagement go hand in hand with less effort. But the results also show that a strong preference for separating work and private life does not have to diminish effort—if commitment and engagement are strong.

In the pilot studies on the four-day week, the switch often seems to serve as a trigger for change. This is exactly how the X-day week should be used at company level—as a spark to rethink processes, to involve employees in planning, to take up ideas and to create new motivation for individual and collective work. In this way, performance and productivity can be increased, as can hourly wages.

On this basis, everyone can then make the best possible choice for themselves as to how much time they want to invest in their work. It should not be the shortage of skilled workers, or the digital transformation or the Zeitgeist that decides—but we alone.

Enzo Weber
Enzo Weber

Enzo Weber is a professor of economics at the Institute for Employment Research, Germany’s largest institute in the social sciences. He is a researcher and political adviser in the transformation of labour markets, demographic change and social security.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u42198344ce 92c9 4f54 9a14 edee35fb9221 3 Europe’s Quest for Technological Sovereignty: A Feasible Path Amidst Global RivalriesChristian Reiner and Roman Stöllinger
u4219834670ab 1 Reclaiming Sutan Sjahrir: The Quiet Moral Core of Democratic Socialism in Southeast AsiaDeny Giovanno
u421983467 4b96 a2b4 d663613bf43e 0 A Fair Future?  How Equality Will Define Europe’s Next ChapterKate Pickett
u42198346742 445d 82f2 d4ae7bb125be 2 A Progressive Industrial Policy for the Global South: A Latin American PerspectiveJosé Miguel Ahumada and Fernando Sossdorf

Most Popular Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
09d21a9 The Future of Social Democracy: How the German SPD can Win AgainHenning Meyer
u421983462 041df6feef0a 3 Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher EducationManuel Muñiz

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp