Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Stress at work: countering Europe’s new pandemic

Claes-Mikael Ståhl 3rd April 2023

Occupational stress has become endemic. It damages workers, their families, businesses and economies.

Around half of European workers report exposure to psychosocial risks (PSR) in their workplaces—that’s up from 25 per cent in 2007—contributing to some 50 per cent of all lost working days. The European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), the European Parliament, the Eurocadres federation and other trade union and health-related organisations insist that the European Commission should act swiftly by drafting an EU directive to counter PSR.

The increase in work-related stress can be traced to new technologies changing the pace of work, the pandemic and the significant rise in home and teleworking creating isolation and affecting people’s ability to disconnect, work overload and time pressures, lack of participation in decision-making, poor management of change, growing job insecurity, discrimination and abuse.   

In a Flash Eurobarometer survey in 2022, The European Agency for Health and Safety at Work (EU-OSHA) found that 46 per cent of respondents were subject to severe time pressure or overload of work. About a quarter (26 per cent) referred to poor communication or co-operation within their organisation and 18 per cent to a lack of autonomy or influence over the pace of work or work processes. Violence or verbal abuse from customers or patients affected 16 per cent of respondents and 7 per cent reported harassment or bullying at work. In its latest report published this year, the EU-OSHA also highlighted the link between workplace stress and heart disease.

Stress and depression can destroy livelihoods and even lead to suicide. And women are even more exposed to psychosocial risks than men—a gender dimension in the assessment, prevention and treatment of this disease is thus essential.

No legislation

Currently, there is no legislation covering PSR at EU level. The framework directive on health and safety (89/391/EEC) places on employers ‘a duty to ensure the safety and health of workers in every aspect related to the work’. But with no specific reference to work-related stress, it does not address the assessment and management of PSR.

Non-binding instruments, such as the social partners’ Framework Agreement on Work-Related Stress (2004), have limited impact on national legislation, which varies significantly among member states. Consequently, workers in different countries do not enjoy consistent minimum protection.

The EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work, launched in 2021, also lacks ambition in tackling PSR and musculoskeletal disorders. It presents mental health as an issue for individuals and fails to address the role of work organisation. The initiatives mentioned (such as Horizon 2020 projects) focus on individual interventions and healing, rather than collective action and prevention.

Mere guidance on the risks is, alas, highly unlikely to offer workers adequate protection. Individual remedies are only one element in mitigating PSR and do not cover the many risks related to work and employment conditions. The European Trade Union Institute has collected a huge amount of evidence in this field.

The strategic framework urged the social partners to take action and update existing agreements relating to PSR, but this had already been addressed through a joint fact-finding seminar during the European social partners’ past autonomous work programme. The 2004 framework agreement has been on the books for almost 20 years, but awareness-raising activities, guidance and exchange of best practice have had limited impact, demonstrating the clear need for European legislation. EU-OSHA research shows legal obligation is the main motivation for employers to address health-and-safety issues (for 89 per cent in 2019, up from 85 per cent in 2014).

Urging a directive

In 2019, Eurocadres, with the support of the ETUC, launched the ‘End Stress’ campaign to demand legislation at EU level to address the ‘stress epidemic’ sweeping Europe. A year ago, with its report A new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020, the European Parliament echoed the call.

Specifically, the parliament urged the commission:

to propose, in consultation with the social partners, a directive on psychosocial risks and well-being at work aimed at the efficient prevention of psychosocial risks in the workplace, such as anxiety, depression, burnout and stress, including risks caused by structural problems such as work organisation (ie poor management, poor work design or not properly matching workers’ knowledge and abilities with the assigned tasks).

EU legislation should incorporate five vital elements:

  • Workers and trade unions must participate in developing, implementing and monitoring measures to prevent work-related PSR. Health-and-safety committees should be strengthened or established where they do not yet exist.
  • Employers must be under a clear obligation to assess, mitigate and work to eliminate psychosocial risk factors and put in place preventive measures, paying special attention to vulnerable workers such as those with disabilities.
  • Employers should be required to set targets and objectives to reduce work-related stress, in dialogue with employees’ representatives, and results should be evaluated at company, national and European level. Indicators must be developed to allow employees and employers to evaluate improved working conditions and the successful implementation of social targets in the workplace. 
  • All workers must have access to training, with trade unions playing a key role in designing and implementing training and best practices. Managerial staff should receive specialised training to equip them to tackle work-related PSR.
  • The directive should protect workers who raise concerns about psychosocial risks in the workplace. Labour inspectorates need further funding and training to carry out their role of safeguarding employees. 

Misunderstood, stigmatised

The growing number of working days lost through PSR has an economic as well as social cost. In Belgium alone, in 2020 insurers spent €1.6 billion on depression and burn-out cases.

Yet, as with many other issues surrounding mental health, stress and depression are often misunderstood or even stigmatised. A recent survey in the United States found many workers were afraid to talk to their employers about their mental health. When viewed as an organisational rather than an individual issue, PSR and stress can and should however be prevented or managed, just like any other workplace health-and-safety risk.

According to the World Health Organization, depression is already the leading cause of ill-health globally and a major contributor to the overall burden of disease, requiring urgent action. The European Union should offer an example to the rest of the world and take urgent steps to protect workers from PSR.

Claes Mikael Ståhl
Claes-Mikael Ståhl

Claes-Mikael Ståhl (cmstahl@etuc.org) has been deputy general secretary at the European Trade Union Confederation since September 2021. He deals primarily with social dialogue, trade and standardisation.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983ae 3b0caff337bf 0 Europe’s Euro Ambition: A Risky Bid for “Exorbitant Privilege”Peter Bofinger
u4219834676b2eb11 1 Trump’s Attacks on Academia: Is the U.S. University System Itself to Blame?Bo Rothstein
u4219834677aa07d271bc7 2 Shaping the Future of Digital Work: A Bold Proposal for Platform Worker RightsValerio De Stefano
u421983462ef5c965ea38 0 Europe Must Adapt to Its Ageing WorkforceFranz Eiffe and Karel Fric
u42198346789a3f266f5e8 1 Poland’s Polarised Election Signals a Wider Crisis for Liberal DemocracyCatherine De Vries

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity”,

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641