Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Greece And Germany: What Are The Real Political Issues?

by Gesine Schwan on 27th April 2015 @Gesine_Schwan

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Gesine Schwan, Greece And Germany

Gesine Schwan

At the World Bank spring meeting in Washington federal finance minister Schäuble let it be known – almost in passing – that the Greek government had until the end of June to confirm what reforms it would make. Up till now, people had talked of the end of April as the deadline, previously of mid-March. So, why this latest deferment? Because we mean Greece so well? Perhaps we might also take the following into account:

If Greece was declared definitively insolvent at the end of April, then the EU and Germany – that “leads” on this issue – would have at least three problems:

  1. There’s no agreed insolvency procedure for states. What do we do if lawlessness and social unrest erupt in Greece?
  2. We’ve no well-ordered procedure for an exit from the euro; on principle, for political reasons, this was never foreseen. How would the Eurogroup handle an insolvent Greece? Can it be forced to quit? And what happens to the euro afterwards? Will the Eurozone be reduced practically to a currency union that one can join or leave? Which country would be next on the speculators’ radar? Would that come about without impacting on the EU single market?
  3. There’s no orderly mechanism for an exit from the EU – that was also never envisaged for political reasons primarily. What would the EU do about an insolvent, perhaps normless Greece?

For the German government, committed in the realm of politics to legal regulations and controls above all, this is pretty uncomfortable. It’d be a lot better to avoid this outcome and reach a deal with Greece. Because everything we hear suggests there’s no Plan B, neither in Greece, nor in Germany.

What stands in the way of an agreement? Some, particularly in Germany, say: the Greeks are failing to put their house in order (it can be proven empirically they’ve cut spending more than any other European country), they’ve a conceited finance minister who’s not seriously after a solution – and they’ve swapped competent staff in the various ministries for a bunch of incompetents. One can’t deal with them. In a word: these are not legitimate political disputes but about Greece and, above all, its new government being incapable of ever cutting a reasonable deal. But we never learn officially what the Greeks have failed to deliver exactly, which of their proposals proved unacceptable – and why.

It’s said, unofficially, that the “Troika” is missing greater flexibility on the labour market. It obviously wants easier hire-and-fire; which – given the high unemployment, the desperate mood of the country and the recession that, with no real prospect of export opportunities, can clearly be traced back to a lack of domestic demand – is an astonishing demand. And there’s no sign that, with further sackings, growth will burst forth because of private investors arriving in their droves.

The Troika and Germany are obviously also disturbed that the government is only going about privatisations with great reluctance: insisting that the receipts make it worthwhile, e.g. the Greeks don’t want to squander their assets under pressure. What’s more, the German ‘Treuhand‘ – which privatised GDR assets – could only get rid of its assets in the end by being out of pocket! Furthermore, the Greek government wants to keep significant stakes in state assets (so it’s not left to the Chinese alone to decide the fate of the port of Piraeus) and insists that investors create jobs. The federal German government thinks these restrictions will put off potential investors. Whether it’s the Chinese or not, the only important issue is that Greece can return to the financial markets.

Beyond that, it’s put about that the government is not serious about tax evasion. It has, of course, begun negotiations with the Swiss about tax-evading assets – but with no success so far. Sven Giegold, a Green MEP, supports its stance:

Switzerland has only offered to settle legacy issues anonymously in order to protect its wealthy Greek clients from prosecution. It’s right and proper that Greece, like virtually all other EU countries, has turned down this toxic offer. (taz, 19/03/2015).

What’s more, we know that these days taxes can best be collected on a European basis.

The Troika, in addition, obviously want an increase in VAT along with a raising of the retirement age or cut in pensions – which three generations often have to live on these days. These measures are a further burden on the population, they’ve not helped a jot so far – the little bit of growth around declined already at the end of 2014 under the previous administration – and would more and more remove the government’s legitimacy. Here’s the take of Poul Thomsen, head of the IMF’s European department:

We have to accept there’s a new government chosen by the voters to manage the crisis in a different way. (Handelsblatt, 20/04/2015, p.12).

The proposed measures to combat corruption haven’t yet been criticized by the Troika. And it’s obvious that these – like all proposals to build up an effective, transparent administration – can’t succeed in just three months.

Finally, there’s the issue of debt-repayment of course. A haircut is generally rejected. At the same time, it’s an open secret that in Greece’s current situation the debts can never be paid back. So it’s a question whether and how talks on rescheduling the debt can be started. For that, one needs time and it makes no sense to place Greece constantly under the Damoclean sword of threatened insolvency. But this easing is ruled out. And, presumably, this is what lies behind the dispute between Germany and Greece.

In reality, the issue here is not coolly calculated economic regulations but basic political understanding or view of humanity. The conservative lawyer Wolfgang Schäuble wants control, he mistrusts both people and politicians and not only Greeks.

It’s a meagre, scrimping life that the European visitor tries to make tasty for his audience. Political progress is accordingly only possible if the actors are under constant pressure. It’s great if one succeeds in sticking to a scarcely incalculable number of rules. And crises are good as they enforce change.

That’s the start of a report by Claus Hulverscheidt in the Süddeutsche Zeitung on an event at the Brookings Institute in Washington where finance minister Varoufakis followed Schäuble. The former spoke, on the contrary,

about the marvellous power of democracy,… of freedom and self-determination. Friendly murmurs in the audience.

The older the distinguished politician Schäuble became, the closer he got to the classical German tradition of authoritarianism: anthropological pessimism, distrust, control, judicial enforcement instead of politics. In post-WW2 political culture, this traditional authoritarianism was supposed to give way to a democratic view of humanity in schools because democracy can’t exist without a basic trust in civic liberty and sense of responsibility.

So it’s quite logical that the outcome of democratic elections in Greece should be treated by a conservative German government as an accident that should be reversed as quickly as possible so that the country can be brought back under domestic or European control. Syriza is not viewed as a final opportunity to get out of the crisis without social unrest and with a government that retains (at least so far!) society’s support. Rather, it should fail – setting an example for Podemos in Spain’s elections this autumn – and be replaced. Clearly, there are delusionary expectations about a return to power of the conservatives. If this elected government can be forced to the wall, then an uncontrollable situation becomes more likely and that might bring an invitation to a renewed military dictatorship. There may be a few people who wouldn’t see that as a bad thing if it came with the retention of austerity politics. They would justify it as “force of circumstances.” But that would leave the EU with a “values” problem.

There are, indeed, other forces in Germany, e.g. the trade unions which, in tune with the Greeks, have made it absolutely plain that this austerity politics has failed; that investments and not just cuts are necessary to promote sustainable growth and, at the end of the day, slowly pay back debt. The SPD and Martin Schulz, who delivered an enthusiastic homage at the Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation to Mark Blyth, the sharp critic of austerity politics, have always underlined that. So the question now would be how to find a practical way for the German government to avoid losing face but abandon its current austerity policy – one that has damaged Greece as well as other southern countries. The German chancellor’s famous pragmatism can be trusted in this regard. She could grasp self-critical considerations uttered by the IMF. The following 10-point programme might serve as the basis for a deal:

  1. A moratorium on repayment of public debt (apart from the ECB) is declared. Greece’s debt is not waived but repayment only begins seriously when growth in Greece makes it possible without causing economic damage. This would be spelled out in detail in a further agreement defining a growth threshold for the repayment to start. Interest rates for Greece would be reduced again in a third aid package.
  2. An exact strategy for collecting taxes. The chief tax-investigator sacked by the conservatives would be reinstated and allowed to get on with the job as he sees fit. Tax officials would replace civilians in monitoring this work. The proposal from the ex-head of the tax administration is put into effect.
  3. Concrete steps for combatting corruption are put together with the help, e.g., of the Greek chapter of Transparency International.
  4. Within a realistic timeframe, administrative reforms, especially the establishment of a land registry, are drawn up.
  5. The EU helps Greece with investments fostering the swift removal of unemployment.
  6. It does the same for other distressed EU countries.
  7. Property taxes are recast in a more redistributive manner to ease the burden on the middle class.
  8. The minimum wage is increased slightly.
  9. The OECD aids the Greek government in the implementation of these promised measures. It ensures transparency in Greece’s fiscal and economic decision-making. It provides a platform for further defined moves.
  10. Conditions regarding privatisations are jointly developed to take into account public assets, jobs and the current market situation.

You tell me how you treat Greece and I’ll tell you what your politics are.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Politics ・ Greece And Germany: What Are The Real Political Issues?

Filed Under: Politics

About Gesine Schwan

Gesine Schwan is a German political science professor and chair of the Basic Values Commission of the SPD. The party nominated her twice as a candidate for the federal presidential elections.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards