Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Long-Term Unemployed Youth: The Legacy Of The Crisis

by Massimiliano Mascherini on 17th April 2018

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Massimiliano-Mascherin

Massimiliano Mascherini

A decade on from the financial crisis and Europe is finally on a stable path towards recovery, with growing economies and robust improvements in labour market participation in all Member States. However, the long-term implications of the crisis still weigh heavy on Europe’s most disadvantaged youth.

The latest data from Eurostat reveals sustained growth in the employment rate and a decrease in unemployment rates for all age groups. In 2017, the unemployment rate for the general population decreased to 7.6%, reaching a level very close to the 7.2% observed in pre-crisis 2007. Similarly, the rate of unemployment among young people finally decreased to 16.8%, a level that it is not far from the 15.7% recorded in 2007.

Notwithstanding this remarkable improvement and the rosier scenario for labour market participation of youth, the legacy of the crisis is still visible in the substantial increase in the cohort of long-term unemployed young people. Analysis of the composition of the NEET population over time reveals that higher levels of this group recorded in 2016 were driven by growth in the cohort of the long-term unemployed. While the rates of NEETs in short-term unemployment decreased from 3.3% in 2008 to 3% in 2016, the share of those that were respectively long-term unemployed or discouraged workers increased from 1.4% and 0.5% in 2008 to 2.3% and 0.7% respectively in 2016.

Figure 1 – Composition of the NEET population 2008-2016

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Having a large cohort of young people who suffer protracted disengagement from the labour market is not just a risk for the individual but also for the broader society.

Long-term scarring

Experiencing long-term disengagement is detrimental to the well-being and employment perspectives of young people. Recent research from Eurofound on long term unemployment among young people has shown that this has a scarring effect on a young person’s lifelong economic outcomes. The research also confirms that, while the scarring effect on employment participation tends to disappear over time, those who experienced long-term unemployment are more likely to suffer permanent damage to their earning prospects, resulting in a sizeable income penalty over the course of their lives.

Long-term unemployment dramatically affects several dimensions of young people’s well-being. In particular, it decreases overall life satisfaction and, most importantly, increases the risk of social exclusion and mental health problems. Young people who have experienced long-term unemployment are also more likely to be materially deprived compared with others in the same age group, including the short-term unemployed.

It is important to understand that the protracted disengagement of young people from the labour market results in an accumulation of monetary and non-monetary barriers that prevent young people from fully participating in society. Due to their daily confrontation with structures and institutions, the young long-term unemployed are more likely to accumulate a general disaffection with and resentment against society as a whole and with political actors.

This is the “discontent of declining expectations”, as defined by Allan Larson, of young people who have made costly investments in their education but still are struggling to enter the labour market and to achieve the same working and living conditions as their parents.

The term ‘Youthquake’, which is defined as a significant cultural, political, or social change arising from the actions or influence of young people, was declared 2017’s word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries. This term came into popular use following the increased political participation of young people during the UK election, reversing a long trend of political apathy and lower participation rates among them.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

While any increased participation in society by young people is very beneficial overall, it can manifest itself in various ways. As early as 2012, Eurofound alerted to the likelihood that resentment and mistrust in institutions accumulated during the crisis due to lack of jobs were likely to take on a political dimension, driving young people’s response to the crisis towards open support for opposition or illiberal forces and anti-establishment parties. The discontent behind Youthquake has no defined political direction in Europe; in the UK it took the direction of progressive forces, in the latest 2018 Italian elections more than 60% of young Italians voted for anti-establishment parties such as the Five Star Movement and Lega Nord.

Multiple disadvantages

Long-term youth unemployment is certainly not a new policy challenge for Europe and Member States have been quite active in implementing initiatives targeted at those furthest from the labour market.

However, re-integrating long-term unemployed young people is not an easy task given the many levels of disadvantage they are more likely to face. This group has specific characteristics: they are more likely to be male, indigenous nationals, and to lack work experience and education. They are also likely to experience multiple disadvantages, with a disproportionate amount having a difficult family environment and possible health issues.

For this reason, a holistic, individualised and young-people-centred approach is crucial for bringing young people back on track. This would require a broader approach to boosting the employability of youth, including elements such as counselling, mentoring, referral to specialised support services, tailor-made training and job placements, as well as flexible and sustained support through all stages of the programme.

All these measures should be put in place as part of the Youth Guarantee. However, despite the numerous efforts put in, the size of the cohort indicates that long-term unemployed youth are those for whom the Youth Guarantee – now five years in place – and the Long Term Unemployment Initiatives have yet to prove effective.

As the aim of the Youth Guarantee is to prevent the long-term disengagement of young people, such a large cohort of young people who have been unemployed for 12 months or more reveals that additional efforts are required from Member States and the European Commission in order to fully implement its provisions and effectively support young people in their transition to the labour market.

This column is sponsored by Eurofound.
TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Long-Term Unemployed Youth: The Legacy Of The Crisis

Filed Under: Politics

About Massimiliano Mascherini

Massimiliano Mascherini Is head of the social policies unit at Eurofound, having joined the organisation in 2009 as a research manager. He has a PhD in applied statistics from the University of Florence and has been a visiting fellow at the University of Sydney and Aalborg University.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards