Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

New EU fiscal rules: a democratic deficit

Andris Šuvajevs 14th June 2023

The proposed new rules would give member states more role in defining their ‘fiscal paths’—just not parliaments.

In a recent article, Philipp Heimberger argued that the reformed European Union fiscal framework on the table contained sensible elements but could be improved. One of the areas he identified as problematic was lack of parliamentary involvement in the national budget-making process.

As a parliamentarian myself, I have seen first-hand what little influence MPs have over national budgets and thus over the politics of money more generally. This should be alarming.

The annual budget law effectively determines the trajectory of economic development—it shapes and reflects social norms, enabling one to see what a society values. A new housing fund, for example, is not just a financial instrument: it represents a political decision to value shelter for the public rather than leave it to individuals and the market.

Parliaments should be the sites where such values are debated and contested. Yet this is far from the case, at least in my own national parliament in Latvia. And the fiscal reform proposed by the European Commission may further impede democratic control over budgetary policy.

‘Too much democracy’

If a major reform is to be viable, it needs to offer a sensible deal to the main stakeholders. The commission claims that, under its proposal, the role of member states in designing their ‘fiscal paths’ will actually increase.

They will be expected to come up with four-year plans outlining necessary reforms and investments to help meet fiscal targets and address any macroeconomic imbalances while ensuring growth. In return, the commission will assume more ‘policing’ functions, assessing and monitoring these plans and, if necessary, enforcing compliance with the general accounting rules.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



This might seem a fair deal. Yet it is likely that national parliaments will be further removed from meaningful oversight. The institutional structure of the eurozone reflects the belief that the politics of money has to be safeguarded from ‘too much democracy’, since politicians cannot be trusted with prudent housekeeping.

If budgetary policy were, in fact, democratic it should be the national parliaments exercising the functions of assessment, monitoring and compliance. This would enable MPs to have a meaningful say over how resources are organised, distributed and consumed. But if these functions are further delegated to the commission, national parliaments become little more than accessories in the grand game of fiscal power.

Futility and absurdity

The current rules, suspended since March 2020 owing to the pandemic, already constrained parliaments in exercising their power over fiscal matters. This was evident in the larger scheme of things as much as in minute, day-to-day, political work. On a general level, the rules concerning permissible debt and deficits fulfil not an economic but a political function.

Economically heterodox scholars have sweated many hours trying to demonstrate the futility and absurdity of these accounting rules—and, from an economic point of view, they are obviously correct. Yet it is equally futile to argue against these rules on the grounds of economics, since their role is simply to discipline parliaments, drawing a clear line in the balance sheet under which no more entries are allowed. In practice, this encourages poor budget-making, since the quality of a proposal is measured not by its content but by whether associated expenditure slips in under the permitted deficit.  

The undemocratic nature of the fiscal framework however becomes apparent in more mundane matters. There is a clear asymmetry in terms of information, knowledge and capacity among parliaments, finance ministries and the commission. When a Ministry of Finance presents an initial budget project to its parliament, this is already over-determined by macroeconomic assumptions regarding the scope for action.

Even if MPs comprehend the meaning of a ‘structural’ deficit (as against cyclical swings), how ‘potential’ gross domestic product is calculated and associated ‘output gaps’ are derived, it is not possible to object to their use and significance in the first place. One can only ask ‘difficult’ questions to illustrate how political these technical terms and assessments are—without much hope of changing them.

Equally controversial

The new fiscal framework is supposed to do away with the widely contested ‘output gaps’. Yet the ‘debt sustainability analysis’ at the heart of it will likely prove equally controversial. On the surface, this will (again) be a technical device, this time calculating the trajectory of a country’s debt. But it will naturally be based on forecasts about growth and the effects of public spending which contain many technical assumptions likely to remain obscure to most MPs—and thus beyond question.

Most parliaments are unlikely to have the necessary capacity to delve into such issues and will simply accept the analysis brought forward, although it yields a specific amount as to what the country is allowed to spend in the coming year. This reduces the potential capacity of MPs to accommodate forecasts to the actual socio-economic needs of the country. Even investment projects with a clear long-term benefit will likely be rejected on the basis of accounting rules favouring short-term planning.

To be fair, this is not all the fault of the commission and there are plenty of things national parliaments can do to enhance their oversight over the budget. But, even now, a member-state’s government is incentivised to minimise the role of its parliament in the process: it asks for commission approval over the planned budget before it consults parliament and any meaningful change requires further commission approval, dragging out decision-making in a way any government wishes to avoid. If the seal of approval from the parliament were to precede that of the commission, this would already introduce more democracy and make MPs bigger stakeholders.

The new fiscal framework is going to be a step in the right direction. But its democratic adequacy can best be gauged by the debate in each parliament about the framework itself. Meaningful debate is however likely to be absent—illustrating just how parliaments have been consistently excluded from these decisions.

Andris Šuvajevs
Andris Šuvajevs

Andris Šuvajevs is a member of Latvia’s parliament, representing the Progressives, a green party of the left. His political work is focused on fiscal and tax policy as well as public spending. He has previously worked as a financial journalist, policy analyst and lecturer in social anthropology.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834dafae1dc3 2 EU’s New Fiscal Rules: Balancing Budgets with Green and Digital AmbitionsPhilipp Heimberger
u42198346d1f0048 1 The Dangerous Metaphor of Unemployment “Scarring”Tom Boland and Ray Griffin
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
u42198346ec 111f 473a 80ad b5d0688fffe9 1 A Transatlantic Reckoning: Why Europe Needs a New Pact Beyond Defence SpendingChristophe Sente
u4219834671f 3 Trade Unions Resist EU Bid to Weaken Corporate Sustainability LawsSocial Europe

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641