Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

The circular economy: a geometry lesson

Maira Babri, Hervé Corvellec and Herman Stål 13th June 2023

Equating circularity with narrowing and slowing lets virtually all businesses join the bandwagon.

circular economy,circularity
The need to dispose of radioactive waste from nuclear fission makes such energy generation inherently linear (vchal/shutterstock.com)

The correct definition of phenomena is essential not only for the development of knowledge but also for the impact and utility of concepts in the real world. Indeed, such precision may be one of the premises of our ability to tackle the climate crisis.

Take the ‘circular’ in circular economy. Implementing change based on an incoherent and imprecise conceptualisation of circularity could bring inertia, through diluting yet another sustainability concept. There are huge risks if it becomes impossible to assess whether businesses’ societal and environmental ambitions really bring about fair, equitable and sustainable transformations.

‘Circular washing’

The obvious risk is of ‘circular washing’, the self-proclaimed labelling of businesses as circular, or committed to circularity, without fulfilling basic transformational criteria. Circular washing allows linear business models to relabel themselves as circular at virtually no cost for them, but at a continued cost to the environment.

For example, the nuclear-waste industry declares itself part of the circular economy, which is a stretch. Fast-fashion corporations such as H&M claim commitment to circularity while most of their revenue is still generated through linear material flows, including practices devastating for the environment. And beverage companies such as Coca Cola use packaging with some recycled as well as virgin polyethylene terephthalate (PET) but remain essentially linear producers whose products are among the most polluting in the world.

Circular washing blunts the critical edge of circularity and replaces it with non-demanding options. Particularly problematic is that researchers and industry representatives alike often define circularity by referring to three different ways of creating circular value: slowing, closing and narrowing.

Logical error

Building definitions of circularity on slowing and narrowing is a logical error: narrowing has been the rule of material efficacy since the industrial revolution. Producing thinner planks, steel plates, fibres or plastic bags—to have cheaper furniture, clothes, planes and cars, while using less material—is a basic principle of linearity. Narrowing is in no way specific to circularity: if one thins a broad line, it nevertheless remains a line.

Similarly, slowing is about speed, not trajectory. And circularity is a trajectory.

Narrowing or slowing circular loops can probably be a good idea, to make already closed loops more sustainable. They could therefore function as important add-ons to circularity, along with others such as virtuality and switching to bio-based alternatives. But whether they contribute to reducing environmental footprints and increasing fairness has to be determined case-by-case—they do not in themselves entail a closed loop.  

Indeed, with narrowing and slowing, virtually everyone can join the circular bandwagon:

  • narrowing lets most of the linear economy be redefined as circular provided that it aims at resource efficiency—packaging, for instance, become circular if only it uses less material resources than earlier generations of packaging;
  • slowing lets all of the ‘slow’ alternatives—slow food, slow tourism and so on—also join the circular economy, but spending a month somewhere as a tourist instead of a week will not make the stay circular.

Closed material loops

Circularity should be clearly defined as meaning closed material loops: there must first be a circle before something is classified as circular. A vague definition risks confusing customers, employees and others interested in meaningful change or allowing them to think they are contributing to environmentally friendly action when they are not.

Permitting corporations to deliver circular credits to themselves would accord legitimacy to the view that they are fully equipped to handle sustainability on their own, without the ‘interference’ of regulators or environmental movements. Such a diluted understanding of the circular economy would delay essential changes in production, distribution, consumption and waste management.

To maintain its transformational potential, the circular economy needs to be associated with an actual closing of material loops, recognising that this entails a new balance of power among corporations, customers and those who work with material recovery—not least waste pickers in the global south. The environmental footprint of production and consumption must be reduced, through decreased extraction of virgin materials, lower production of new units and efficient recycling and reuse practices.

Will to regulate

Actions on the European Union and national levels—in terms of regulation and its implementation, follow-up and punitive sanctions for non-compliance—can address directly this latest form of ‘greenwashing’. In January, the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive entered into force, with new European Sustainability Reporting Standards requiring companies to report comparable qualitative information on how they affect people, the environment and the climate. The standards will be applicable starting from 2025, reporting on year 2024, and successively, depending on the size and type of company.

In March, the Europen Commission presented a proposal for a directive on the substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims. This aims to protect consumers and empower them to contribute actively to the green transition. The proposed directive would provide the framework necessary to hold companies to account for deceptive or false environmental claims. How national governments embrace such a directive, if agreed, would however be critical.

There needs to be a willingness to regulate for the circular economy if we are to see any meaningful change. If industry were to remain free to define its own terms, the concept would be greatly devalued.

Maira Babri
Maira Babri

Maira Babri is senior lecturer in business administration at Örebro University in Sweden, with an interest in research and collaboration for an inclusive, equitable and fair circular economy.

Herve Corvellec
Hervé Corvellec

Hervé Corvellec is a professor in business administration at Lund University, with a research interest in waste and the circular economy.

Herman Stal
Herman Stål

Herman Stål is an associate professor / senior lecturer in business administration at the School of Business, Economics and Statistics of Umeå University in Sweden. He teaches and does research on innovation and organisation relating to the circular economy and climate change.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198345f5300d0e 2 Britain’s COVID Generation: Why Social Democracy Must Seize the MomentJatinder Hayre
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity”,

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641