Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

European Parliament elections: prospects for the left?

by Arthur Moinet on 22nd January 2019 @ArthurMoinet

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Following a string of national defeats, social-democrat parties are ill-prepared as the European Parliament elections loom. Success for the left in May will depend on its ability to reframe the political argument.

Arthur Moinet

The European left is going through a crisis. In an insightful article, ‘What happened to Europe’s left?’, Jan Rovny explains that the various political defeats of social-democratic parties—in France, Germany, Italy, Holland, the Czech Republic and Greece—stem from shifting their focus to the new middle classes, letting the ‘precariat’ fall for nationalist protectionism. For Rovny, the political sphere is crystallising as a new cleavage between cosmopolitans and traditionalists, where the left, especially social democracy, is gradually being discarded.

Social democracy’s revival must find its source in a new European project. In a crisis, it is better to return to the fundamentals. Historically, socialism and social democracy embodied internationalist values. Unlike extremist parties, European construction is a leftist battle. So, the upcoming European elections could be a good opportunity for the left to reaffirm its values.

Nevertheless, this will only possible by committing to fundamental guiding principles. The first should be that the Party of European Socialists (PES) break definitively with the European People’s Party (EPP). After all, is it not conservativism’s aim to maintain the established order? Many citizens think Europe does not have any impact on their daily life. The ‘grand coalition’ between the EPP and PES contributes towards reinforcing extremism.

Social democrats and socialists, gathered in the PES, must finally break with the conservatives of the EPP. This is the only way to disrupt the European status quo and adopt bold poroposals. Even in the event of defeat, the PES will be better off within the parliamentary opposition than in an EPP-dominated commission where its influence is lacking. 

Institutional reform

Furthermore, the conservatives reject any global reform of the Institutions. But the European left must put on the table an institutional reform, promoting a real legislative force and effective supervisory power for the European Parliament. Too often, the parliament is reduced to being a mere echo chamber, when it should control the European Commission. 

The parliament should obtain greater budgetary and monetary prerogatives. For instance, it could vote on the various economic objectives such as deficit or debt targets. And it could acquire more legitimacy with real European elections: transnational lists should focus on European issues and challenges, refusing to allow the elections to be dominated by national issues.

It is also important to ensure a strong role for the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee, to promote a European social dialogue. Finally, the European left should push for once and for all for a proper, full-scale European budget, financed by more efficient taxation and more oriented toward infrastructure investments and regional development.   

Fiscal reform

In her recent book, Leftism Reinvented, Stephanie Mudge argues that left-wing parties have given up their duty to protect the poorest, paving the way for extremist parties. If the judgment appears very harsh, left-wing politicians have to take it seriously.

The European left should propose a common fiscal reform. EU member states should harmonise their taxes and define common rates, particularly for corporate taxes. This policy would have two advantages: limiting the dumping effects, still apparent in the single market, and taxing global companies more efficiently.

Indeed, for years, we have seen the rise in power of many big companies, particularly in the digital sector (the infamous GAFA), whose activities are more difficult to locate and thus tax correctly. In the spirit of social justice, we should tax these firms at the European level, according to their number of users in each country. Such common taxation could be extended to limiting the obscene profits of the European soccer industry, for instance.

The benefits of this new European tax should supplement the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund to foster the construction of the common European social model. And when it comes to trade agreements, the European left should above all reaffirm its commitment to a strong European industrial base and environmental and social standards, as the only way to impose an efficient and protective European transnationalism.  

Social ecology

A crucial goal for the European left will be to convince voters that Europeanisation and globalisation are not necessarily bad things. As Roberto Unger put it, the question should not be ‘how much globalisation?’ but rather ‘what manner of globalisation?’.

If the EU has achieved its main historic goal—bringing sustained peace—it must rise to a new objective: creating a common social model, based on solidarity and common identity. It will be the prerequisite for a Europe which changes people’s lives and ensures solidarity.

The left must play a key role here—first, by promoting an ecologically-minded ideology. Today, it is not possible to be on the left without being ecological. The concept of social ecology establishes that ecological policy must be the starting point for all social policies.Facing global warming, the European left could propose a European environmental treaty, which could represent an ecological counterpart to the Stability and Growth Pact and the Maastricht criteria.

Secondly, the European left, if it wins power, must demonstrate that Europe can bring social progress. A European migration strategy, currently absent, could finally resolve the migratory crisis. A directive currently limits the working week to 48 hours—this ceiling should be further reduced. And those states condemned for abrogations by the European Court of Human Rights should be financially sanctioned by the European Commission, so as to encourage social progress. The EU would then act as a protective shield for its citizens and it would be possible to realise a ‘European dream’, more focused on politics and citizenship.  

If the European left succeeds in proposing ambitious ideas for change, it will regain power in the various European countries. Institutional reforms, social and fiscal harmonisation, ecological ambition, social progress—it should take ownership of these concepts in the coming months.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ European Parliament elections: prospects for the left?

Filed Under: Politics

About Arthur Moinet

Arthur Moinet is a SciencesPo student and activist. He is treasurer of the Conférence Olivaint, a student association for public debate, and author of L'Alternative lycéenne.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards