Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Why should just transition be an integral part of the European Green Deal?

by Béla Galgóczi on 4th December 2019

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

In our series on ‘just transition’, Béla Galgóczi focuses on what it means for the key sectors of coal and cars.

coal
Béla Galgóczi

That there is a climate emergency has been widely acknowledged. New scientific evidence on the devastating effects of climate change, ever more dramatic, appears on a weekly basis. Scientists warn that global warming may reach a tipping point in the immediate future—one that triggers a sudden and violent shift in the system and catalyses a domino effect of dramatic further changes via positive-feedback mechanisms.

While the COP21 Paris agreement of 2015 was a historical milestone, the commitments of the signatories would only confine global warming to an estimated 3C by the end of the century, compared with pre-industrial levels. This would far overshoot the +1.5C ceiling which, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is necessary to keep the impacts within bounds.

Long-term objective

Acknowledging the gap between the European Union’s earlier commitment and the Paris targets, in November 2018 the European Commission set the long-term objective of a climate-neutral Europe, to be achieved by 2050. The European Green Deal, announced by the new commission as its flagship initiative, is to transform this objective into concrete policies. One pillar is a large-scale investment plan, which would require estimated yearly commitments of between 175 and 290 billion euro to energy systems and infrastructure.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Stepping up the EU`s climate ambition is unquestionably the priority. But we need to be aware of what it means to reduce greenhouse gases in the next 30 years at four times the rate the EU will have achieved between 1990 and 2020. This would constitute a fundamental revision of the linear, extractive and fossil-fuel-based growth model of the past, with a restructuring of the entire economy—leading to major changes and adjustments which would affect jobs, livelihoods, working conditions, skills and employment prospects.

This paradigm change can only succeed if it happens in a socially balanced way. ‘Just transition’, a framework developed by the trade-union movement to encompass a range of social interventions needed to secure workers’ rights and livelihoods when economies are shifting to sustainable production, has become a recognised element of climate policies, referred to in the Paris agreement.

Early declarations about the European Green Deal suggest that a social dimension would be one of its integral elements. The cases of two key sectors of the European economy—energy and the automotive industry—demonstrate why this is important.

Phasing out coal

Meeting the commission’s objective of a net-zero-carbon economy by 2050 will not be possible without the timely phasing out of unabated coal from energy generation. In 2015, 18 per cent of the EU’s greenhouse-gas emissions came from the chimneys of just 284 coal-power plants, with a total employment of 52,700 across the union. In 2017, the number of coalmining jobs in the EU was just below 130,000.

Although the total number of coal-dependent jobs makes up only a small fraction (about 0.15 per cent) of European employment—and a much greater of jobs were lost during the financial crisis—the challenge is that these are concentrated in a small number of regions with wide-ranging potential impacts on the local and regional economy. Poland alone has nearly two thirds of the coalmining and nearly half of total coal-dependent jobs in Europe.

In many of these regions, the livelihood of a large part of the population is dependent on a coal-based economy. Although a lot of progress has been made in 2019, the current coal phase-out plans by member states are inadequate by far (see map) and substantial efforts remain to be made.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

The status of coal phase-out in the EU (October 2019)

coal
Source: Europe Beyond Coal (2019) and national sources. Cyprus, Belgium, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Malta have no coalfired plant. While Estonia does not have a coal plant its energy generation is largely based on a much more polluting solid fuel, oil shale, and it has no plan to phase it out.

Phasing out coal is thus a manageable and highly rewarding ambition—indeed, it is seen as a ‘low-hanging fruit’. But dedicated and concentrated efforts are needed in terms of regional and employment initiatives, in which an EU-level Just Transition Fund must play a leading role.

Transport shift

Unlike coal, cars and individual transport will still have a future in a net zero-carbon world. But it will be a very different one from today, with a shift in modes of transport and a phase-out of the combustion engine. Although the automotive industry is not widely seen as a case for just-transition policies, the magnitude of employment change in this sector will definitely require that.

Unlike coal, the industry is a key employer in Europe, covering 13.8 million jobs altogether. It is undergoing three simultaneous transformations. First, regulation aimed at fulfilling climate objectives and improving environmental performance is pushing it towards powertrain electrification.

Secondly, there is a ‘mobility revolution’, whereby extensive digitalisation and vehicle electrification will boost the development of new business concepts and service-provision functions, based on new connectivity and autonomous features. Such change is truly revolutionary since it has the potential for overhauling vehicle usage and ownership, along with the industry’s traditional business model.

Thirdly, digitalisation across the automotive value chain promises to stretch the physical limits of flexible production further, with considerable impact on working environments. Intelligent production systems are building the interface between production machines and employees through an integrated communication network. In addition to the new automation potential opening up, this will also facilitate comprehensive control of the production process.

The paradigm change in mobility and transport will also have a disruptive effect on established patterns of globalisation in the industry. Car manufacturers in Europe will need to face these challenges, which will rewrite business models with reverberations throughout the supply chain.

Social dimension

An ambitious European Green Deal can only succeed if it has a strong social dimension. As the European Trade Union Confederation puts it, this must be ‘inclusive and supportive for the most vulnerable regions, sectors and workers’. The transport and energy sectors will deliver a large part of the decarbonisation of the European economy and deserve special attention—in terms of investment and social and employment policies.

Phasing out coal as soon as possible is the pre-eminent interest of the entire EU and will have a huge reward in terms of emission reductions, combined with very limited employment effects at the European level. At the same time, coal-based employment is concentrated in a small number of European regions. There is a clear case for European solidarity and the delimited scale of the problem allows of rapid progress.

European structural and cohesion policies need to prioritise Green Deal objectives but dedicated support is also required. The existing European Platform for Coal Regions in Transition needs to be equipped with appropriate finances and could be rebranded as the Just Coal Transition Platform.

The automobile industry faces even more complex challenges and its importance for the European economy is of a different magnitude. Its transitions will need tailored employment policies under a new framework. Social dialogue and plant-level agreements will have a key role in managing an epochal transformation process.

With higher climate ambition it must be clear that earlier ideas about a Just Transition Fund should also be upgraded. Pooling existing funds and attaching a ‘just transition’ label won’t do.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Why should just transition be an integral part of the European Green Deal?

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: just transition

About Béla Galgóczi

Béla Galgóczi is senior researcher for the European Trade Union Institute and author of the new book Towards a Just Transition: Coal, Cars and the World of Work (ETUI, 2019).

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards