Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

A shot in the arm

Andrew Watt and Sebastian Dullien 10th May 2021

The European Union needs to raise its vaccination target and bring it forward. The good news is it can.

vaccination
Andrew Watt

Two months ago, dissatisfaction with vaccine roll-out in the European Union was widespread. Just over 7 per cent of the population had received a shot and the daily vaccination rate was under 0.2 per cent. The EU announced a goal: 70 per cent of adults were to be vaccinated by September 22nd. That entailed a daily rate of more than 0.5 per cent of the population—a more than 2.7 times boost.

It is time to revisit that analysis. The pace of vaccination has increased substantially—although with country differences—as supply constraints have eased. The EU should adopt a more ambitious vaccination target, of 75 per cent of adults by the end of August—possibly sooner.

vaccination
Sebastian Dullien

The state of play is presented in Figure 1 (the data are from Our World in Data, as of May 3rd). The columns show shots administered per 100 population (left axis) and the latest seven-day average for daily vaccinations (right axis). Most countries are bunched close to the EU average, which stands at just under 34 per cent and a daily rate of just under 0.6 per cent, with a small number of outliers.

Figure 1: total and recent daily vaccinations by member state (% population)

vaccination

From this starting point we have calculated the vaccination rates needed to achieve three different policy goals. The current EU rate—which applies to the total population—of 0.59 per cent per day is faster than that required to achieve the target of 70 per cent of adults by September 22nd: even assuming two doses per person, only a 0.56 per cent daily rate is needed. Allowing for the fact that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine needs only one shot, that falls to 0.5 per cent. (Based on available German delivery data, we conservatively assume that 15 per cent of shots given from now on are J&J.)


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

At the current vaccination rate, the 70 per cent target would already be reached towards the end of August. Clearly the EU could and should strive for more ambition.

Ambitious goal

Figure 2 shows that without any further acceleration the EU could achieve more than 75 per cent vaccination coverage by September 22nd (provided 15 per cent of shots lead to full vaccination). It also shows what would need to happen to achieve an ambitious goal of 75 per cent of the adult population already by the end of July—within around 90 days of this data collection. On a realistic assumption about the role of J&J the required daily vaccination rate is 0.87 per cent.

Figure 2: current and target daily EU vaccination rates

vaccination
Because the recommended gap between AstraZeneca vaccinations has been widely extended to 12 weeks, we allow for the fact that those now receiving a first AZ shot will likely not be fully vaccinated until after the end of July: there would be a correspondingly higher number of persons having received one shot.

Turning to individual member states, Figure 3 shows the ‘acceleration factor’ by which countries need to increase (or could decrease) their recent vaccination rate to achieve each target. Most are already on track to reach the 70 per cent target. Some—mostly in eastern Europe but also Greece and the Netherlands—still need a not-insignificant boost to vaccination rates, by 30-50 per cent. The outlier Bulgaria needs to more than treble its rate.

What is remarkable is the small additional effort required overall to achieve 75 per cent coverage of those over 18 by the September equinox.

A considerably more difficult task is to bring forward the achievement of the 75 per cent goal to the end of July. Apart from the outliers Hungary and Malta, this latter requires extra effort on the part of all countries.

Given the short time involved—less than 90 days—a doubling of rates from current levels, as would be needed in ten countries, looks a tall order. Equally, apart from the two best-in-class outliers, for a further 13 countries an acceleration of a maximum of around 60 per cent—and for Spain and Germany only a touch over 10 per cent—would bring this ambitious target within reach. This group includes the five largest countries—Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland—which alone account for two-thirds of the EU population.

Figure 3: acceleration factors to achieve vaccination targets

vaccination

Europe should take a ‘Yes we can!’ approach to the vaccination campaign, building on recent progress. The EU policy target should immediately be raised from 70 to 75 per cent of adults and could at the same time feasibly be brought forward—if not to the end of July at least to the end of August.

What is the importance of the additional five percentage points? Remember we are discussing the adult population. The meaning of ‘herd immunity’ is imprecise—strictly speaking, it applies when, in the absence of any restrictive measures at all, the reproduction rate (R) falls virtually to zero. Experts are unsure of the exact figure, but this would require a very high vaccination level. Even allowing for the continuation of some of the less encumbering restrictions, a vaccination incidence of 70 per cent of adults, or less than 60 per cent of the total population, is substantially below what is required for a pragmatically defined herd immunity and to limit the risk from new variants.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Total injections corresponding to the full vaccination of 75 per cent of adults should be seen as a minimum. The European Medicines Agency is considering an application to make the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine available also for youngsters down to the age of 12. This would mark an important further enhancement of protection.

More than adequate

How realistic are more ambitious targets? The supply of vaccines has improved dramatically. There is, of course, uncertainty regarding future deliveries. But taking German data as a point of reference—because of the common procurement system these can be extrapolated—supply should be more than adequate.

Deliveries to German vaccine centres and doctors’ practices are foreseen to rise from around four million doses in the last week of April (the basis for the recent vaccination trend in the above calculations) to possibly five and a half million a week during May and to a minimum of six million in June (the latter figure makes no allowance for AZ via doctors’ practices and no J&J at all). Only somewhat older forecasts are available for the third quarter but they exceed the June estimates. And from July the CureVac vaccine, should it receive EMA approval in time, will make an initially small additional contribution.

Excluding the additional possible supplies would permit 1 per cent of the German population to be vaccinated every day. Extrapolating to EU level, even this absolute minimum volume of expected deliveries would be above the 0.8-0.9 per cent daily rate that would suffice for the vast majority of EU countries to achieve the most ambitious target discussed here.

When supply is available, the capacity to deliver vaccine to people’s arms can quickly be created and sustained. Israel, Hungary, Malta and the United States have maintained daily vaccination rates close to 1 per cent for extended periods. Germany, Spain and some other EU countries have seen rapid hikes in their capacity to administer doses, expanding vaccination centres and mobilising doctors’ surgeries as supply constraints have lifted.

Convinced and cajoled

At least initially things get easier as prioritisation becomes less important and the special needs of the sick and elderly no longer play such a role. As vaccination rates rise, however, harder-to-reach groups will need to be targeted, convinced and maybe even cajoled. In countries where the campaign has been most successful, such as the US, there are already signs that it is tailing off before anything like herd immunity is achieved. EU countries need promptly to address vaccine hesitancy and scepticism and find ways to reach target groups.

Speed is important. Vaccination saves lives and permits battered economies to resume operation, easing the burden on public finances, so every day counts. Still, what is ultimately important is achieving a level of vaccination—without regional coverage gaps, risking flare-ups—that keeps the virus at bay.

A more demanding target, even if it cannot be achieved by all countries, would help Europe raise its common ambition. But a target alone is, of course, not enough: EU countries that have lagged behind should get additional support—even if poor national choices within the common procurement system were largely responsible.

Last but not least, Europe has been the biggest contributor to the global vaccination effort, specifically the Covax programme. But much more needs to be done, through generous licensing and joint-production agreements, to increase production in, and supplies to, less developed countries.

Andrew Watt and Sebastian Dullien

Andrew Watt is head of the European economic policy unit at the Macroeconomic Policy Institute (Institut für Makroökonomie und Konjunkturforschung) in the Hans Böckler Foundation. Sebastian Dullien is scientific director of the institute.

You are here: Home / Society / A shot in the arm

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube