Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Covid-19 is an opportunity for Europe

by Lucrezia Reichlin on 17th March 2020 @LucreziaReichli

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

The EU has always advanced on the back of crises. The Covid-19 outbreak represents a chance to pool resources towards a co-ordinated fiscal policy.

Covid-19 co-ordinated action fiscal stimulus
Lucrezia Reichlin

For years, fears have been mounting that a ‘black swan’ would test the European Union’s crisis-management capabilities. With the outbreak of the coronavirus, those fears have come to pass—and it is not at all clear that the EU will be able to withstand it.

The Covid-19 epidemic is not just any stress test. For starters, it is likely to affect the entire world, leading to a synchronised growth slowdown or even recession. Synchronised recessions are virtually always deeper and longer-lasting than downturns affecting individual economies, and they hit open economies such as the EU particularly hard.

Compounding the problem, because every EU member state is facing a severe shock, they will be far less able to help one another than they were during the eurozone crisis that began in 2010. To be sure, Italy has suffered the most so far. But past transmission patterns elsewhere suggest that Covid-19 will continue to spread across Europe, putting every country under growing strain.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Of course, it is impossible to say precisely how the epidemic will unfold. But that uncertainty will only exacerbate the economic fallout, because it will undermine investment and household consumption.

Harbinger of recession

Already, the virus has disrupted supply chains and slowed global trade, with predictably negative effects on corporate revenues and employment. The tourism and transport sectors have been hit particularly hard, owing not only to government-mandated travel restrictions, but also to voluntary ‘social distancing’ and reductions in movement. As a result, overall demand is already declining, reflected in plummeting oil prices—typically a harbinger of global recession.

To be sure, the consequences of a negative shock such as Covid-19, however painful, could be shortlived. But while China seems to have brought new infections under control, the number of cases continues to rise elsewhere. Unless this changes soon, the economic effects are unlikely to be temporary.

A more probable scenario is that the Covid-19 shock will test the resilience of public-health systems, labour relations, and formal and informal solidarity mechanisms across the EU. And if the pandemic is not confronted with an aggressive and timely policy response, its effects are likely to be long-lasting, especially if amplification mechanisms are activated.

Such mechanisms typically work through the financial sector. The good news is that, thanks to improved regulation, banks are better capitalised than they were in 2008, when the last global financial crisis erupted. But some countries still have serious weaknesses, and the resilience of small and medium-sized enterprises remains dubious. In the manufacturing sector, SMEs are already suffering. In the event of a protracted crisis, the damage to them will end up on banks’ balance sheets.

Co-ordinated action

In the EU, the capacity to mount an effective response and withstand unavoidable damage (including from the overall decline in demand) varies across member states. But, even in relatively well-equipped countries, unilateral, ad hoc measures have only limited potential. Co-ordinated action—especially on the fiscal front—would be far more effective.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

This does not mean simply allowing member states to run larger fiscal deficits. Though this would help—not least by improving the relationship between the EU and its citizens—it would affect some countries’ risk premia (as the Italian case shows). We learned a decade ago that this could threaten the eurozone’s very survival and exacerbate the crisis by leading to financial segmentation.

Monetary policy can help in different ways—namely by providing liquidity where needed. For example, policy-makers could implement targeted operations conditional on banks lending to SMEs. More broadly, central banks need to use all available tools to offset downward pressure on inflation expectations from the fall in oil prices.

But what the EU really needs is a co-ordinated fiscal stimulus that takes advantage of its joint-financing power. Yet, at present, it has no instrument in place to support member countries amid large common shocks. The European Stability Mechanism could be activated in an extreme scenario but using it as a demand-management tool would be inappropriate. And the EU Solidarity Fund is too small for the job.

Crisis-management mechanism

The Covid-19 pandemic thus represents an opportunity for the EU to create a powerful crisis-management mechanism, which pools member states’ resources and channels them toward a co-ordinated fiscal policy. The idea of such an ‘insurance fund’ is not new: several economists championed the idea after the last crisis, when discussion of governance reform was in full swing.

The EU has tended to make the most progress in bad times. And, as the millions of people on lockdown in Italy and beyond can attest, the Covid-19 outbreak is a very bad time. Now is the moment for the EU to take swift co-ordinated action and capitalise on the momentum to build the institutions it needs to facilitate even more effective action next time.

The current geopolitical context should reinforce Europe’s motivation to bolster its crisis-management capacity. In 2008, international co-operation predominated, and the United States was a reliable partner to Europe. When European banks desperately needed US dollars, currency swap lines were quickly established to safeguard financial stability.

Today, by contrast, isolationism is on the rise, with the US taking the lead. The US Federal Reserve consulted no one before implementing its recent emergency interest-rate cut. One shudders to think what would happen if European banks urgently needed dollar funding in this context.

Covid-19 should serve as a powerful warning to governments worldwide. The combination of environmental degradation and deep economic interconnection has made the world more vulnerable than ever to sudden, large-scale shocks. The EU owes it to its citizens to ensure that it can respond.

Republication forbidden. Copyright Project Syndicate 2020 Covid-19 is an opportunity for Europe

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Covid-19 is an opportunity for Europe

Filed Under: Economy Tagged With: coronavirus

About Lucrezia Reichlin

Lucrezia Reichlin, a former director of research at the European Central Bank, is professor of economics at the London Business School.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards