Social Europe

  • Themes
    • A ‘manifesto’ for 2024
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Does the United Nations still exist?

Branko Milanovic 3rd October 2022

Branko Milanovic charts the fall and fall of the organisation tasked with preserving world peace.

United Nations,UN,Security Council,secretary-general,Guterres,war,peace,Ukraine
The first lady of Ukraine, Olena Zelenska, at the UN General Assembly, her husband, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, delivering a pre-recorded address (lev radin / shutterstock.com) 

The General Assembly of the United Nations ended its annual session only a week ago in New York. There were more heads of state and government than ever before. Everybody gave a speech (for most delegations limited to 15 minutes). The traffic in New York was heavy for a whole week, as the delegates shuttled between the hotels and restaurants.

So the UN seems pretty alive. But on the biggest issue on the planet, a war which has entered its eighth month between two countries with a combined population of 200 million—one of which possesses the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons and threatens to use it—the UN has been a bystander.

The UN secretary-general, António Guterres, has been seldom heard. On the most important matter for which the League of Nations and later the United Nations were created—maintenance of world peace—he has nothing to say but platitudes. He has managed, late in the conflict, to effect one trip to Kyiv and one to Moscow. That is all.

Join 23,000+ informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. 

It's free.


Thank you!

Please check your inbox and click on the link in the confirmation email to complete your newsletter subscription.

.

Many argue that the secretary-general and the secretariat are hamstrung by the great powers. The five permanent members of the Security Council can veto whatever decision they do not like. This is true. But the secretary-general does possess agency. He has a moral authority, if he decides to use it.

Independently of the great powers, he can try to bring the warring sides to the table. He can set himself in Geneva, indicate the date at which he wants the ‘interested parties’ to send their delegates, and wait. If some do not show up, or ignore him, at least we shall know who wants to pursue the war, and who does not. He is the only non-state actor in the world with this kind of moral authority. Technically, the world has entrusted him with the task of preserving peace—or at least with the attempt to preserve peace. He seems to have singularly failed.


Become a Social Europe Member


Support independent publishing and progressive ideas by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month. Your support makes all the difference!


Click here to become a member

It is not however only Guterres’ fault. The origins of the recent decline of the UN go back 30 years to the end of the cold war. Three factors have made the current UN possibly worse than even the defunct League of Nations.

Openly violated

The first is that after the end of the cold war the United States, finding itself in the position of hyperpower, did not want to be trammelled by any unnecessary global rules. No new regional—much less global—organisations were created, save for the rather inconsequential European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. This is in contrast to what happened after the first and second world wars, as with the foundation of the League of Nations and UN respectively.

What is more, UN rules were openly violated. After the end of the cold war, the US and its allies attacked five countries on four continents without UN authorisation: Panama, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq (the second war) and Libya. (For Libya, there was a UN Security Council resolution but its mandate of civilian protection was exceeded by the overthrow of the regime.) France and the United Kingdom, also veto-wielding members of the Security Council, participated in most of these violations of the UN Charter, even if France refused to go to war against Iraq. And Russia attacked Georgia and Ukraine (the latter twice).

Thus these four permanent members broke the charter eight times. Among the permanent members, only China did not do so. The UN as a collective-security organisation, whose primary duty is to protect the territorial integrity of its members, has failed in that role—simply by being ignored by the most powerful states.

These states have to be unanimous in the selection of the secretary-general, given their individual vetoes over the Security Council’s recommendation to the General Assembly to that effect. They have colluded in selecting increasingly puppet-like figures for that position. Boutros Boutros-Ghali never received a second term. Kofi Annan, Ban Ki-moon and now Guterres were much more pliable: they just went AWOL when matters of war and peace were at stake.

Perhaps nothing illustrates better—although farcically—the type of person who has come to fill the role of secretary-general than the incident in Iraq in 2007 when a bomb exploded near the place where Ban Ki-moon and the Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, were holding a press conference. While Maliki was unperturbed by the sound of the explosion, Ban Ki-moon almost hid under the lecturn and quickly ran for the exit.

Unlike Dag Hammarskjold, who died while trying to mediate in the conflict in the Congo in 1961, recent secretaries-general seem to have imagined that their duty consists mostly in going from one cocktail party to another. They do not realise that by running for such an office, where presence in war zones is necessary, they have also accepted the risks that come with that.

No longer pressing

The second reason for the decline of the UN and international organisation is ideological. According to the ideologies of neoliberalism and ‘the end of history’ which so heavily dominated the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century, dealing with world peace and security was no longer the most pressing task of the UN. Helped by the proliferation of non-governmental organisations (and false NGOs), the new ideologues broadened the mission of the UN to many subsidiary issues with which it should have never been involved but rather left to other governmental and non-governmental bodies.

Many of these new mandates are utterly meaningless. I was asked to advise on Sustainable Development Goal number ten, reduction of inequality. I did not do so. I thought it made no sense, was impossible to monitor and consisted of pious wishes, many mutually contradictory—as any reader of the ten targets on inequality may easily convince themselves.

The third, related reason is financial. As the mandate of the UN, the World Bank and other international institutions was broadened to include practically everything imaginable, it became obvious that the resources provided by governments were insufficient. Here NGOs met billionaires and private-sector donors. In a series of actions unthinkable when the UN was created, private interests simply infiltrated themselves into organisations created by states and began to dictate the new agenda.

I saw this first-hand in the World Bank research department, when the Gates Foundation and other donors suddenly began to decide on priorities and to implement them. Perhaps their objectives as such were praiseworthy, but they should have gone about realising them independently. Having an inter-state organisation depend on billionaires’ whims and fancies is like outsourcing public education to the Fortune 500 list of richest US corporations.

It had a further negative effect. Researchers or country economists in institutions such as the World Bank spent most of their time chasing private donors. Being good at fundraising gave them a power base within the institution. Thus, instead of being good researchers or good country economists, they became managers of funds who then hired outside researchers to do their primary jobs. The institutional knowledge which existed was dissipated. The only international institution, as far as I know, which has not succumbed to this internally devastating trend is the International Monetary Fund.

This is how the entire UN system went into decline and we ended up in a position where the head of the only international institution ever created by humankind whose role is preservation of world peace has become a spectator—with as much influence on matters of war and peace as any other of the 7.7 billion denizens of our planet.

This is a joint publication by Social Europe and IPS-Journal

Pics3
Branko Milanovic

Branko Milanovic is a Serbian-American economist. A development and inequality specialist, he is visiting presidential professor at the Graduate Center of City University of New York and an affiliated senior scholar at the Luxembourg Income Study. He was formerly lead economist in the World Bank's research department.

You are here: Home / Politics / Does the United Nations still exist?

Most Popular Posts

map of Black Sea Ukraine war: Russia’s hold on Crimea loosensStefan Wolff
Trump,Donald,November,insurrection Why Trump can’t win in NovemberReed Galen
Navalny,killed,Putin Shock therapy killed NavalnyAntara Haldar
Ukraine,war,Russia,conflict,victory Ukraine: a bitter armistice or war until victory?Frank Hoffer
Ukraine,war,Zelensky Ukraine war: Zelenskyy’s very risky moveStefan Wolff and Tetyana Malyarenko

Most Recent Posts

riders Milan Platform work directive—delivering rights for allLudovic Voet
UNSC Gaza: status of UN Security Council ceasefire demandAmanda Cahill-Ripley
homecare nurse Women at work: doing different jobs, still unequalWouter Zwysen
refugee wreck Mediterranean The missing migrants: myriad preventable deathsUgochi Daniels
stressed woman leader Women leaders in CSOs—overworked, overwhelmedEloïse Bodin

Other Social Europe Publications

Global cities cover pdf Global cities
strategic autonomy Strategic autonomy
Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 scaled 1 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe: the ongoing quest for Social Europe

Given the political significance of this European election year, the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) decided in their annual Benchmarking Working Europe report to provide a retrospective assessment of the state of Social Europe. Using fact-based evidence and analysis, this edition demonstrates that the new impetus for Social Europe of the past five years has led to important and long-awaited policy initiatives, including on minimum wages, platform work and corporate due diligence. Progress however remains fragile and fragmented.


AVAILABLE HERE

Eurofound advertisement

How to improve gender equality in the world of work?

Despite gender equality being a core principle of the European Union, women are less likely to be in employment than men in all EU member states and are paid less than men in almost every member state, with the pay gap larger in higher paying jobs.

Listen to research experts discuss how to tackle the gender employment and pay gaps in Europe in a Eurofound Talks podcast.


LISTEN HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The Progressive Yearbook, now available!

With its fifth edition, the Progressive Yearbook can be considered an established and thriving tradition, through which FEPS wishes to reflect on the most important developments of the previous year and to try to imagine what the future has in store for 2024.

With this new volume, we prepare ourselves for a transformative year marked by pivotal elections. We cast a spotlight on the 2024 European Parliament elections and extend our attention to the broader political landscape. Reform of the EU treaties, enlargement, the twin transition and international developments are some of the topics of this year’s edition.

The book also includes an interview with the recipient of the FEPS Progressive Person of the Year award: Teresa Ribera.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Comparing living and working conditions: Germany out-performs the United States

This paper compares living and working conditions in the US and Germany for the year 2022 with a focus on economic, social and environmental standards. Emphasis is also placed on income and wealth inequality.

Twelve dimensions of comparison are used, split into 15 themes, examined with 80 indicators. Germany comes out ahead on 10 of the themes. When the relative sizes of the gaps are also taken into account, Germany gets an overall score of 23 and the US only 6.

This paper is, to the knowledge of the author, the only comprehensive comparison of living conditions in the US and Germany. The framing of the comparison is the analysis of two different types of capitalism. It underlines the limited role of per capita gross domestic product in the living conditions of the majority of the population while highlighting the impact of institutions and the type of welfare state.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Friedrich Ebert Stiftung advertisement

It‘s all about jobs: investing in Europe’s workers and qualifications for a competitive clean economy

An ecological miracle on the labour market? Or rather job losses? The impact on employment and job profiles in Europe of ecological modernisation is a question driving politics and society.

We have taken a close look at studies and forecasts on the development of the European labour market. One thing is clear: without qualified and motivated workers, the economy will not flourish and the modernisation process will come to a standstill. Europe must deliver on a massive scale in the coming years to remain at the forefront.

We spoke to trade unionists and experts: what trends do we need to shape, what risks do we need to avoid, what course do we need to set now? Key findings in this study from FES Just Climate.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on YouTube

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641