Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Ensuring trade unions have a say in the transformation of work

by Richard Pond and Jan Willem Goudriaan on 3rd December 2020 @EPSUnions

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Digitalisation is a key issue in public services. Workers must have a role, via their unions, to maximise its benefits and minimise its risks.

public services, EPSU
Richard Pond

Recently, public-service unions in Spain signed a major new agreement on telework, covering 2.5 million public-sector employees. The agreement shows how trade unions can negotiate effectively to establish new rights for workers and even guarantees on the delivery of services to citizens.

The unions were responding to the explosion of telework across public administration, as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, and they wanted to ensure that the short-term, emergency changes to working practices were properly regulated for the long term. The agreement says that telework should be voluntary, reversible and subject to health-and-safety requirements, equality, transparency and objectivity. It also provides for the ‘right to disconnect’, data protection and the right to privacy.

public services, EPSU
Jan Willem Goudriaan

Telework is, of course, a familiar and longstanding part of the transformation of work, driven by digital tools, and more fundamental changes are in prospect as public services adopt new processes and exploit further the potential of artificial intelligence. While there are concerns about the implications for workers, unions are also aware of the possible benefits of digitalisation.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Major moves

In a survey of affiliates of the EPSU (the European Federation of Public Service Unions) involved in tax administration—where there have been major moves over several years to digitalise key processes—13 trade unions from 10 countries agreed with the assessment that digitalisation had helped improve job quality, with only seven disagreeing. However, most (19 out of 21) also agreed that digitalisation was often introduced as part of a cost-cutting strategy.

EPSU has been keen to understand what is happening across its sectors and in 2017 it commissioned a report by the research organisation OSE (the European Social Observatory) on the impact of digitalisation in public administration (public-employment services) and social services (home care), based on focus groups of workers in France, Spain and the United Kingdom. It revealed positive outcomes in terms of better work organisation and time management, improved communications and reduced commuting and travel time. Workers also however raised concerns about the increased pace and intensification of work, more monitoring and surveillance by employers and inadequate training.

The report indicated the very limited extent to which digitalisation was effectively regulated by collective bargaining or social dialogue—or indeed subject to proper processes of information and consultation. This finding was reflected more recently in a survey of managerial and technical workers in the UK civil service. The survey, for the EPSU affiliate Prospect, found that 73 per cent of workers were not very confident or not confident at all that their employer would involve them in decisions about how new technology was implemented.

Inclusive strategy

This question was fundamental to a 2017 agreement in Norwegian local government, signed by the Fagforbundet trade union, the Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation and the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities. The aim was to shape an inclusive strategy for the digitalisation of public services and it committed the parties to social dialogue and active worker participation in shaping the transformation.

The agreement stressed the need to involve worker representatives and employees in the process—examples from healthcare showed how shop stewards could be involved in joint committees on digitalisation. Employees were also encouraged to engage individually, with some becoming ‘digital agents’, testing and deciding on the introduction of new digital tools.

Three years on, a report on a project involving 70 municipalities draws positive conclusions in relation to the involvement of employees and shop stewards. Indeed in some cases change has extended beyond digitalisation to the broader relationship between municipal employers and worker representatives.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

With the financial support of the European Commission, EPSU has been running a project on collective bargaining and digitalisation. A survey of participants in its first four seminars revealed that 58 per cent thought digitalisation had been implemented in a unilateral way by employers, with only 33 per cent saying there had been any information and consultation; only 8 per cent had been involved in any negotiations. So there is still a long way to go before even most EPSU affiliates are able to ensure they have a role in regulating digitalisation.

Spurious grounds

Information, consultation and negotiation have also been central to discussions between European employers and trade unions, led by EPSU, in central government. The partners concluded an agreement on information and consultation rights on restructuring in 2015 and wanted it to become generally binding, via a European directive. This would have plugged a gap in the existing directive on those rights.

The commission however intervened and refused this on spurious grounds, leaving EPSU no choice but to seek annulment of the decision. The case (T310/18) is now in front of the European Court of Justice, following an appeal.

The employers and unions continued their discussions in a project on digitalisation and work-life balance. This was finalised in November 2019, with the approval of a checklist and series of recommendations, on how to ensure that the progressive digitalisation of services or processes in governments improved the work-life balance of employees throughout their career. Managers and central government were also recommended to frame digitalisation in a strong collective-bargaining culture, based on trust, gender equality and regular consultation of employees and civil servants and their trade union representatives.

The European social dialogue in electricity has addressed this, in a framework of actions agreed earlier this year by EPSU, industriAll and Eurelectric, the employers’ organisation. While sharing the view that digitalisation is a challenging opportunity to boost innovation and promote smart technologies, both sides see guidelines as essential to address restructuring in a socially responsible transition. The framework covers training and lifelong learning and strategies to prevent psycho-social risks—particularly recognising the importance of the right to disconnect and safeguarding working-time arrangements and wellbeing at work.

Model agreements

These issues are also being actively tackled at national level by EPSU affiliates. The Unite trade union in the UK and ver.di in Germany have drafted model agreements which can form the basis of negotiations at local, sectoral and national levels. They underline the need to have information in good time and for worker involvement throughout. Training, health and safety and protective measures relating to monitoring and surveillance are also key.

Earlier this year, ver.di began negotiating a collective agreement on digitalisation with the federal government. Although delayed by the impact of Covid-19, the bargaining process resumed in August with a discussion on the right to training, with the next round of negotiations set to focus on employment security. The union underlines that the aim is to ensure that workers benefit from the opportunities provided by digitalisation and new forms of work, while protecting against the risks.

Digitalisation will continue to be a priority area for EPSU, including monitoring key national negotiations, and collaborating with our global sister organisation, Public Services International, on a new publication on collective bargaining and digitalisation. Further initiatives are also planned—not least a potential major project in collaboration with the OSE, looking in detail at the impact of digitalisation on work and workers in EPSU sectors in eight countries.

While we need to understand better how digitalisation is affecting our members, it is also fundamental to ensure that our unions have the rights to information and consultation, social dialogue and collective bargaining which are crucial to regulate and control the introduction of new digital tools and processes.

This is part of a series on the Transformation of Work supported by the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Economy ・ Ensuring trade unions have a say in the transformation of work

Filed Under: Economy Tagged With: transformation of work

About Richard Pond and Jan Willem Goudriaan

Richard Pond is policy officer for the EPSU, responsible for collective bargaining and research. Jan Willem Goudriaan is its general secretary.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards