Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Equality bodies: how things stand on EU standards

Niall Crowley 10th July 2023

EU standards for national equality bodies have come a step closer but there is work for the European Parliament to do.

equality bodies,standards
Tipping the scales towards equality requires that national equality bodies enjoy independence and are adequately resourced to be effective (Andrey_Popov/shutterstock.com)

Across the European Union, national equality bodies are key statutory institutions with much-needed potential to advance equality, contributing to change at the individual, institutional and societal levels. On the island of Ireland, for instance, are the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland (ECNI) and the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC). Yet such bodies face challenges in realising their potential, with barriers placed in their way as to their independence and effectiveness.

Continuing with the Irish case, the ECNI and the Equality Authority (predecessor of the IHREC) have suffered disproportionate funding cutbacks—43 per cent for the Equality Authority in 2008 and, for the ECNI, a downward trend from 2008 shedding almost a third of its original budget by 2022. Both have championed the need for common EU standards for equality bodies, through their work within Equinet, the European network of such bodies.

Two directives

The European Commission initially responded to this undermining of the potential of equality bodies in 2018, with a non-binding recommendation on the standards that should apply. In a 2021 report, however, the commission noted that ‘a limited and unequal level of implementation of the Recommendation continues to hinder some equality bodies in effectively exercising their role’.

As a result, the commission proposed last December two directives on standards for equality bodies, addressing the conditions required for their independence and effectiveness. The directives are identical but follow different legislative procedures—one addressing the gender ground in employment, the other the wider range of grounds and fields applicable.

The focus then shifted to the Council of the EU, where a former equality-related directive has languished for decades. There was much talk about member-state hostility and possible veto.

In a significant achievement last month, however, the Swedish presidency announced agreement by employment and social-affairs ministers on a general approach to the next phase of negotiation of the proposed directives. This allows Spain, having taken over the presidential baton, to begin negotiations with the European Parliament on one of the directives and to seek the consent of the parliament on the second.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



Price paid

While this agreement has retained some key provisions in the proposed directives, a price has been paid. The provision that an equality body must have independent legal status—not forming part of a government entity—has been removed. Freedom from external influence does remain, with its important link to accountability, but it would have been useful to clarify that independence requires such accountability not to be to a government department.

The provision in relation to transparency in appointments to leadership in equality bodies is retained and usefully linked to the competence and independence of that leadership. Again, however, it could have been stipulated that such appointments be made by parliament, rather than government, and via a competency-based process.

In relation to effectiveness, also kept is the requirement that the necessary human, technical and financial resources are made available to equality bodies to implement all their functions. This is vital where inadequate resources are identified by most equality bodies as their most significant hindrance. But waters are muddied by a reference to this being ‘in accordance with their national budgetary processes’, to ‘allow sufficient flexibility to accommodate the different national contexts and systems in place’.

Concerns about effectiveness further emerge in relation to envisaged limits on the competences to be afforded to equality bodies, in particular on litigation. The proposed directives included powers to represent victims of discrimination in cases of discrimination, to take own-initiative cases and to act as an amicus curiae (‘friend of the court’). The council is not clear that such a range should be provided, setting out conflicting possibilities while signalling ominously ‘that the legal systems of the Member States vary greatly’.

Of relevance to the IHREC are provisions on multi-mandate bodies, stemming from concern that the equality mandate loses visibility and lacks resources when located in a body alongside other mandates, such as human rights. The provisions in the proposed directives are here largely retained: an internal structure in a multi-mandate body that guarantees effective exercise of the equality mandate and adequate resources directed to perform the equality functions.

Monitoring and indicators

The proposed directives provide a monitoring role for the commission, including via common indicators on the themes addressed. The council disappointingly specifies that such indicators cannot be used to issue specific recommendations to individual member states. More usefully, it says equality bodies should be included in indicator development and in reporting on implementation of the proposed directives, through their European networks.

Attention now turns to the European Parliament, where the FEMM (women’s rights) committee is addressing the proposed directives, with support from LIBE (civil liberties) and EMPL (employment and social affairs). Rapporteurs have been appointed, background documentation commissioned and initial debates begun. This offers potential to strengthen the provisions in an arena traditionally more favourably disposed to equality legislation.

Niall Crowley
Niall Crowley

Niall Crowley is an independent consultant on equality and human rights, at a European level and in Ireland, where he was chief executive of the Equality Authority for ten years from its establishment in 1999.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983467 9c73 b24a0b674750 1 The West’s Defence Now Depends on Trump’s Mood SwingsStefan Stern
u4219834674735ecb6fd43 0 The Dark Side Of The Boom In Last-Mile LogisticsSilvia Borelli
u421983467e464b43d2 1 Why European Security and Sovereignty Depend on Its Digital SectorMariana Mazzucato
u42198346c3fba71fa474 0 As Temperatures Rise, European Workers Face a Looming ThreatMarouane Laabbas-el-Guennouni
u42198346741 4727 89fd 94e15c3ad1d4 3 Europe Must Prepare for Security Without AmericaAlmut Möller

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641