Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Europe cannot ‘compete’ with old economics

Johanna Helgesson and Daniel Lind 30th April 2024

Mario Draghi’s report needs to address competitiveness from a systemic perspective, focusing on underlying productivity.

team of architects at work on common project
Productivity growth underlies increasing competitiveness and depends on human, social and natural—not just physical—capital (GaudiLab/shutterstock.com)

In December last year Robert Solow passed away, at the age of 99. He was awarded the Nobel prize in economic sciences in 1987 for his contribution to the theory of growth. Although growth theory has developed considerably since his invention of the neoclassical growth model in the 1950s, almost all students of an introductory course in economics since then should have at least a vague clue about its main underpinnings.

More specifically, growth in gross domestic product occurs when more labour or capital is added to the production process, or when we become better at combining such physical and ‘human’ capital. This latter is often referred to as ‘total factor productivity’ and approximates the rate of technical change. Of course, there are many complexities around this basic set-up, but the main ideas are very much alive in our contemporary policy debate.

In an interview for the Freakonomics podcast, months before his death, Prof Solow said that the extraordinary strong productivity growth seen over the last hundred years or so had been critical for rising real wages and increased prosperity. At the same time, this remarkable development had caused the negative effects on the climate we all see today.

The world’s leading neoclassical growth economist during the postwar period therefore argued for a fundamental intellectual and political change—from conventional indices of productivity and GDP to broader measures of economic and human development. GDP was only a measure of economic activity, not of economic wellbeing, he said.

Moral obligation

A similar approach was foundational in this year’s trio of Lionel Robbins lectures, given by Nicholas Stern in March, identifying his growth agenda for the coming two to three decades. He argued it was not possible to separate the economic discussion from our moral values and how we should organise our society. They were highly intertwined and we had a moral obligation to act, if we wanted to maximise the probability that future generations would have at least the same standard of living as our own.

During the postwar period, Prof Stern said, the economic system had been very successful in increasing the amount of goods and services produced but had also caused the climate crisis. Income disparities had grown rapidly within countries and the life-chances of younger individuals had become more dependent on their parents’ position on the economic and social ladder. The enormous concentration of wealth was not only economically irrational but morally unacceptable.

A naïve market ideology had reversed some of the social improvements made during the first decades after the second world war. Austerity had triggered populism and support for far-right political parties had soared. Trust in society and our fundamental institutions was under threat. The demand for simple answers to complex questions was higher than ever.

With these ecological, political and social challenges, it was not enough to measure progress in terms of GDP. A broader approach was needed, preferably based on the United Nations’ 17 sustainable-development goals.

With these goals as the point of reference, the growth strategy should entail, according to Lord Stern, a more active role by the state. There were many market failures, which government could correct and so make the economy work more efficiently. Industrial policy could be good policy. Not least, government had to give direction in terms of climate policy and steer economies along that path. With the support of government, the green-technology revolution had to continue.

More investments were urgently needed, not least in green tech but also in inclusive growth more generally. It was only a matter of a few per cent of GDP and the future costs would be much higher if that investment were forgone today. It was good economics as well as good for the broader development of our societies. It would make economies more productive and therefore reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio. Growth-enhancing debt was good debt.

In line with the 2021 review of the economics of biodiversity for the British government by Sir Partha Dasgupta, such investments will create the highest economic and social return if we broaden our definition of capital. Of course, machinery/buildings and human capital are paramount, but there are also other types of capital in the balance sheet of our societies.

Most importantly, this concerns ‘natural’ and ‘social’ capital. The fundamental challenge for policy is to make sure that all types of capital develop in the right direction. The future of productivity should therefore rely not only on explicitly discussed moral values and a more active role for the state, but also on a broader, more realistic and more human definition of productive capital.

Technocratic approach

This systemic perspective on productivity—sketched through the lenses of Solow, Stern and Dasgupta—was, unfortunately, more or less lacking in the speech given by the former Italian prime minister and ex-president of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, in Brussels on April 16th. He was presenting the ideas underlying his report on Europe’s ‘competitiveness’, commissioned by the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and anticipated in late June.

Draghi’s focal point was competitiveness, not productivity. This entails taking a relative approach to Europe’s economic development—primarily, how it compares with that of the United States and China. It is, however, hard to see how the long-term competitive position of Europe’s enterprises and societies will strengthen without major improvements in the absolute level of productivity. Hence, productivity growth is a necessary condition for improved competitiveness.

Within this constrained perspective, it is easy to agree with Draghi that European Union member states have focused too much on competing with each other, not least on labour costs and fiscal austerity. This has only reduced domestic demand while undermining the European social model. It is also easy to support his contention that a major challenge for the EU is the lack of co-ordination, effective decision-making and appropriate financing. A union of independent—though interdependent—countries cannot fully benefit from its collective size.

In a turbulent geopolitical world, with the US and China applying many strategic policy measures to reduce their economic and social vulnerabilities and to improve their competitive positions, the construction of the EU becomes an even bigger challenge. Draghi called for no less than a fundamental redirection of the European project, similar to what the founders of the European Coal and Steel Community had achieved 70 years ago. The uneven playing-field and the need for more strategic autonomy required new institutional and policy solutions on the EU level.

We hope that Draghi´s report, in contrast to his April 16th speech, will contain some fragments of the thinking Solow, Stern and Dasgupta provide. The solution to the EU’s long-term productivity challenge is not a narrow, technocratic approach based on outdated economics. In the end, we are all value-driven humans striving for a higher quality of life.

Johanna Helgesson
Johanna Helgesson

Johanna Helgesson is a political scientist, working as a trainee at Arena Idé during this semester.

Daniel Lind
Daniel Lind

Daniel Lind is research director at the Swedish trade-union-related think-tank, Arena Idé, responsible for a three-year project on productivity and labour markets financed by the five unions within Swedish industry.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834664e04a 8a1e 4ee0 a6f9 bbc30a79d0b1 2 Closing the Chasm: Central and Eastern Europe’s Continued Minimum Wage ClimbCarlos Vacas-Soriano and Christine Aumayr-Pintar
u421983467f bb39 37d5862ca0d5 0 Ending Britain’s “Brief Encounter” with BrexitStefan Stern
u421983485 2 The Future of American Soft PowerJoseph S. Nye
u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2 Trump Can’t Kill the Boom: Why the US Economy Will Roar Despite HimNouriel Roubini
u42198346fb0de2b847 0 How the Billionaire Boom Is Fueling Inequality—and Threatening DemocracyFernanda Balata and Sebastian Mang

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

KU Leuven advertisement

The Politics of Unpaid Work

This new book published by Oxford University Press presents the findings of the multiannual ERC research project “Researching Precariousness Across the Paid/Unpaid Work Continuum”,
led by Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven), which are very important for the prospects of a more equal Europe.

Unpaid labour is no longer limited to the home or volunteer work. It infiltrates paid jobs, eroding rights and deepening inequality. From freelancers’ extra hours to care workers’ unpaid duties, it sustains precarity and fuels inequity. This book exposes the hidden forces behind unpaid labour and calls for systemic change to confront this pressing issue.

DOWNLOAD HERE FOR FREE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641