Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Poland’s Dangerous Seismic Shift To The Hard Right

by Thomas Prosser on 27th October 2015 @prossertj

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
prosser

Thomas Prosser

This weekend saw a political earthquake in Poland. Exit polls from Sunday’s general election indicate that the conservative Law and Justice party (PiS) will be comfortably the largest in parliament, able in all probability to govern without a coalition partner.

Following the party’s victory in May’s Presidential election, this would give PiS control over Poland’s key political institutions. Polish politics is indeed generally shifting to the right. Smaller far-right parties also look set to enter parliament, almost certainly the eccentric Kukiz’ 15 and possibly the deranged Partia KORWiN, and if this were the case the political scene would assume an extremely conservative form.

These developments are concerning. Turns to the right happen occasionally in all democracies, yet PiS has long been distinguished by a nationalist-Catholic fundamentalist character that is not of the mainstream right. Certain of the party’s dispositions are infamous. The movement is hysterically opposed to abortion and in vitro treatment, and has greeted the prospect of Poland accommodating Middle Eastern refugees with xenophobic hyperbole.

PiS is also deeply homophobic, and a member of the parliamentary party recently equated homosexuality with paedophilia. The notorious Jarosław Kaczyński also remains PiS chairman. Kaczyński was Prime Minister from 2006-07, spending much of this time embarrassing Poland internationally with his jingoistic and illiberal attitudes. One premise of his when negotiating the Lisbon Treaty – that Poland deserved more votes in the Council of Ministers because the country’s population would be larger were it not for Nazi occupation – will be long remembered in Brussels and Berlin.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

These precedents are worrying enough, yet the ascent of PiS gives additional reason for concern over the future of Polish democracy. The party’s disdain for conventional politics (and preference for conspiracy theories) is well-known. Since the 2010 Smolensk plane crash in which 96 Poles tragically died, many of whom were eminent members of the political class, including Kaczyński’s twin Lech (then Polish president), PiS have cast doubt on the official conclusion that the crash was accidental. High-ranking members of the party have avowed that Smolensk was organized by the Russian and Polish Governments, and for years former Prime Minister Donald Tusk has endured the libel that he masterminded the attack.

The evidential grounds for these assertions, it goes without saying, are as slim as for claims that the moon-landing was filmed in Hollywood. PiS is also contemptuous of the electoral process. When the party failed to acquire its expected votes in 2014 local elections, Jarosław Kaczyński claimed that the poll was fraudulent. The dangers of an opposition leader making such a statement, in a country in which democracy is relatively young, need not be emphasized.  

The success of PiS is thus troubling. Polish liberals have for some time noted parallels between the party and Viktor Orbán’s authoritarian regime in Hungary, and many worry that a PiS-led Government would make of Poland a second Hungary. Following Sunday’s election, the fear is already being expressed that changes will be made to the Polish constitution. Such a development’s wider implications are also alarming. Democracy in central and eastern Europe is already under siege, in no small part due to Vladimir Putin’s activism in the region, and an illiberal Poland would further weaken the region’s democrats. Repercussions for the EU are also inauspicious. Poland is a large and influential member state, and a PiS-led Government would increase the likelihood of illiberal settlements on issues like the refugee crisis.

Happily there are grounds for thinking that worse fears will not be realized. Those spearheading the recent advance of PiS tend to be less fervent than the party’s old guard, Andrzej Duda (President of Poland) and Beata Szydło (the PiS Prime Minister in waiting) make an effort to distance themselves from radicals, and a moderate opposition will still exist in parliament. Polish civil society is also vigorous after twenty-five years of democracy, even if a church sympathetic to PiS remains highly influential, and attempts at the Orbanization of Poland will meet resistance from these sources.

Some indeed hope that the PiS new guard will adopt a conciliatory line towards Europe. The style of Duda and Szydło is more moderate, yet it is difficult to envisage a party chaired by Jarosław Kaczyński adopting the pro-German/EU line toed by the outgoing Government. Friends of European solidarity and democracy will wait with baited breath.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Poland’s Dangerous Seismic Shift To The Hard Right

Filed Under: Politics

About Thomas Prosser

Thomas Prosser is a Lecturer in European social policy at Cardiff University. He has a special interest in economy and society in Poland.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards