Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Putting politics back in charge of the economy

Sheri Berman 7th November 2022

In the neoliberal era, economics marginalised the social sciences. But, Sheri Berman writes, only politics can tame capitalism’s chaotic gyrations.

primacy of politics,politics,economics,profession,DeLong,Hayek,Polanyi,Keynes,economics,profession,DeLong,Hayek,Polanyi,Keynes
Only politics—the municipality of Vienna under social-democratic control—could provide the world’s longest residential building (over a kilometre), one of some 400 such Gemeindebauten built to house those dislocated by the first world war, in a city which remains a social-housing model (florab_photo/shutterstock.com)

Decades of capitalist triumphalism following the collapse of Soviet Communism came to an end with the financial crisis of 2007-09. Since then, recognition of capitalism’s downsides has grown.

Today, capitalism is attacked by a revitalised socialist left and parts of the growing populist right. Even establishment pillars, such as Bloomberg, the Council on Foreign Relations and McKinsey, regularly feature discussions about ‘the future of capitalism’—implying that is in question.

One clear reflection of the changing assessment of capitalism is the economics profession. During the early 21st century, as one influential study declared, neoliberalism was essentially hegemonic within it—and economists were accordingly sanguine about the ability of the economy to flourish relatively unfettered. But over the last decade or so scholars such as Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, Gabriel Zucman, Mariana Mazzucato, Adam Tooze, Anne Case and Angus Deaton have come to the forefront of debate by highlighting the economic as well as social flaws of capitalism.

Interpreting capitalist development

Into these waters steps J Bradford DeLong, an influential professor of economics in the United States, a former deputy assistant Treasury secretary and the author of a widely-read economics blog. DeLong’s Slouching Towards Utopia: An Economic History of the Twentieth Century provides an interpretation of capitalism’s development which reflects how much contemporary economists are grappling with its vicissitudes. Yet the book also makes clear how difficult it is to understand these things by looking at capitalism alone.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

DeLong frames Slouching Toward Utopia around the assertion that the 20th century was ‘the first century ever in which history was predominantly a matter of economics: the economy was the dominant arena of events … and economic changes were the driving force behind other changes’. This perspective, which might be termed the ‘primacy of economics’, leads DeLong to periodise modern history in a particular way.

He argues that a new era began in 1870 when the ‘door’ to capitalist development was unlocked by globalisation, the industrial research laboratory and the modern corporation, enabling humanity to begin ‘slouching toward utopia’. This era, which DeLong (echoing Giovanni Arrighi) terms the ‘long twentieth century’, ended in 2010 when the financial crisis left unclear whether capitalism was still a force for progress.

Hayek and Polanyi

To illustrate how capitalism changed and developed during this period, DeLong utilises two major thinkers, Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) and Karl Polanyi (1886-1964). As readers of Social Europe will be well aware, they had dramatically different views of capitalism.

Hayek was of course a champion of ‘free-market’ capitalism, arguing that it generated more freedom and progress—or, in DeLong’s terms, could bring humanity closer to utopia—than any other system. So strong was Hayek’s faith that he viewed political interventions to achieve outcomes which capitalism did not spontaneously engender as not merely inefficient but entailing a slippery slope to totalitarianism.

Polanyi, by contrast, was a harsh critic, arguing that, left to itself, capitalism undermined values, such as justice and fairness, which were primary rationales of human existence. Indeed Polanyi believed that the socially destructive and dehumanising forces unleashed by untrammelled capitalism would cause a backlash—and it was this which raised the spectre of totalitarianism.

DeLong breaks the ‘long twentieth century’ into five periods, each illustrating the insights of Hayek or Polanyi or both.

Progress, then backlash

The first is 1870-1914. Economic growth began consistently outpacing population for the first time in history, pulling humanity out of the dire poverty which had been its lot hitherto and generating unimaginable medical, technological and cultural progress. This economic revolution also helped break down the social-status hierarchies and oligarchic political systems which had previously limited human freedom. During this period capitalism did indeed, as Hayek would argue, help humanity ‘slouch towards utopia’.

This came, however, with downsides. New inequalities arose between urban and rural areas and between the expanding middle and working classes, with the latter subjected to abominable living and working conditions. Traditional values and communities collapsed, leaving many without safety nets and generating widespread social alienation. Internal (rural to urban) and external migration exploded, forcing many to adapt to dramatically new living conditions as well as to living alongside dramatically different people.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

As Polanyi predicted, the next period (1914-45) saw a backlash. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, nationalist movements feeding off the fear and anger generated by rapid change had grown, contributing to the catastrophe of the first world war. The interwar decades brought endless economic problems: high unemployment, massive inflation and of course the Great Depression.

The ‘Hayekian’ or economically orthodox ‘solution’ to these problems—laisser-faire and austerity—was, as DeLong puts it, ‘completely insane’ and made ‘matters worse’. The suffering caused by capitalism, combined with the failure of establishment figures and parties to deal effectively with it, contributed to growing support for left (Communist) and right-wing (fascist and National Socialist) extremists, who promised to ‘solve’ capitalism’s problems and create a ‘better’ world.

Capitalism tempered, then unleashed

Chastened by the lessons of the interwar years, the west entered a new period after 1945, characterised by DeLong as a ‘shotgun marriage of Polanyi and Hayek blessed by Keynes’. Capitalism re-emerged, in contrast to the hopes of its ardent critics, but it was a capitalism tempered by government interference designed to avoid its disadvantages, disappointing ‘free-market’ advocates as well. If humanity slouched towards utopia between 1870 and 1914, during the postwar social-democratic era it ran. In the decades after 1945, western economies grew faster than ever, while inequality, class conflict and extremism declined.

Despite its successes, this social-democratic era too came to an end. Economic difficulties beginning in the 1970s provided an opening for ‘Hayekian’ attacks on the system and the disappearance of Communism after 1989 emboldened the right. A new neoliberal period thus began, swinging the pendulum back towards Hayek and a greater role for markets, and away from a Polanyian or even Keynesian emphasis on the importance of government intervention to protect citizens from capitalism’s negative consequences.

The outcomes in the west were tepid growth, rising inequality, stagnating productivity and entrepreneurship and a financial crisis which brought this period to an end. (The developing world had a different experience during these decades, with capitalism generating tremendous economic gains and progress akin to that experienced by the west between 1870 and 1914.)

This brings us to DeLong’s fifth period, the contemporary one, characterized by a Polanyian backlash to the negative consequences of the neoliberal era. During the last decade or so the west has experienced rising social discontent and political extremism, as well as a widespread questioning of whether capitalism can still help humanity slouch towards utopia.

Important parts missing

Analyses which identify economic forces as the motor of history remind us of the centrality of capitalism to modernity. But this perspective misses important parts of the story.

DeLong’s narrative of the ‘long twentieth century’ stands in direct dialogue with that of the great European historian Eric Hobsbawm, whose Age of Extremes was subtitled The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991. Hobsbawm’s periodisation was determined by his belief that modern history was defined by political events—the rise and fall of totalitarianism, particularly Soviet Communism—rather than economic ones. Similarly, Polanyi wasn’t merely a critic of capitalism but a radical reinterpreter of it: he insisted its origins and development could only be understood through the lens of the ‘primacy of politics’.

Polanyi argued that capitalism did not emerge spontaneously and nor was it ultimately the consequence of the factors (globalisation, research labs, modern corporations) stressed by DeLong. Rather, Polanyi claimed that political decisions and changes were necessary for the transition to capitalism to eventuate—as well as to prevent capitalism from undermining social stability.

Markets and capitalism

Alongside other economic historians such as Ferdinand Braudel, Polanyi understood that markets and capitalism were not the same. Markets are mechanisms for exchanging goods which have existed throughout history. But it was only in the 18th and 19th centuries, when European leaders began removing restrictions on them and creating conditions enabling research, free trade, corporations and so on to thrive, that capitalism emerged. (China, for example, may have had the most extensive market system in the world during the early modern period. Its leaders, however, restricted crucial areas of economic activity, hindering the rise of capitalism of which instead Europe became the global power centre.)

And it was not just the emergence but also the development of capitalism that was determined by politics. What a Polanyi-esque focus on the ‘primacy of politics’ makes clear is that when capitalism operated relatively unfettered by political authority—as during 1870-1914 and the neoliberal era—it generated not only economic crises but also widespread social discontent and political extremism. It was only when political institutions asserted their power to counteract capitalism’s negative aspects—most successfully in western Europe after 1945 and in the US beginning with the 1930s New Deal—that not merely capitalism but also social stability and democracy could flourish.

The challenge to western capitalism now is thus also primarily political rather than economic. Whether capitalism can once again be a force which helps humanity ‘slouch towards utopia’ depends on whether political authorities prove willing and able to put in place policies that enable its upsides to be maximised while protecting citizens from its downsides.

That Polanyi is the figure to whom even some economists now turn to understand capitalism’s cycles and vicissitudes is a good sign. The next step is grappling with the radical implications of his insistence on the primacy of politics.

This is a joint publication by Social Europe and IPS-Journal

Pics1
Sheri Berman

Sheri Berman is a professor of political science at Barnard College and author of Democracy and Dictatorship in Europe: From the Ancien Régime to the Present Day (Oxford University Press).

You are here: Home / Politics / Putting politics back in charge of the economy

Most Popular Posts

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic

Most Recent Posts

transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit
military secrets,World Trade Organization,WTO,NATO,intellectual-property rights Military secrets and the World Trade OrganizationUgo Pagano
energy transition,Europe,wind and solar Europe’s energy transition starts to speed upDave Jones

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube