Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Siege of Sarajevo: perpetrators of deadly attacks remain unprosecuted

by Erna Mackic on 13th March 2019

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Twenty-seven years since the siege of Sarajevo began, a handful of commanders have been tried, but Bosnian prosecutors have not yet filed any indictments against direct perpetrators of sniping and shelling attacks on civilians.

siege of Sarajevo

Erna Mackic

During the three-and-a-half-year siege of Sarajevo, civilians were attacked with snipers’ bullets and artillery projectiles while buying food at markets, doing their gardening or cleaning the streets. They were shot at while attending funerals and while riding in buses, trams and ambulances or on bicycles. The attacks were mainly conducted during the day. They were not a response to any military threats.

These conclusions were presented by the presiding judge at the International Criminal Tribunal on former Yugoslavia, Alphons Orie, when pronouncing Stanislav Galic guilty of a campaign of terror against the civilian population of Sarajevo, during his term as commander of the Bosnian Serb Army’s Sarajevo-Romanija Corps between 1992 and 1994.

The crimes were on such a scale that Orie sentenced Galic to life imprisonment. Reading the verdict, the judge said that children were targeted while playing or walking the streets. A total of 1,601 boys and girls lost their lives during the siege of Sarajevo.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

One of them was Mirza Imamovic. His mother, Zlatka, recalled how one day she heard an explosion and ran out of the house with her husband, calling for Mirza, who was playing outside.

‘There was smoke … We could not see through it, we did not know what was happening; we ran down the stairs, not knowing what was happening and shouting for Mirza,’ Imamovic said. ‘At some stage I saw my Mirza lying on the stairs, dead … With that moment in my head I go to sleep and with that moment in my head I wake up, every morning for the whole of my life.’

Stanislav Galic and his successor as the commander of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps, Dragomir Milosevic, were jailed by the Hague tribunal for terrorising the population of Sarajevo during the siege. But so far the Bosnian state prosecution has not filed a single indictment for the murders and wounding of thousands of people in the city from 1992 to 1995. No one has been convicted in Bosnia and Herzegovina for the death of Mirza Imamovic and other children like him.

The state prosecution said it has several investigations ongoing over crimes committed as part of the siege, but refused to explain why it has failed to file a single indictment for these crimes it started addressing in 2003. Legal experts argue however that because of the hierarchical structure of the Bosnian Serb army and the evidence presented at the UN court in the Hague, it would be possible to identify a large number of direct criminal perpetrators.

‘It was like Russian roulette’

The former political and military leaders of the Bosnian Serbs, Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, were convicted under first-instance verdicts of responsibility for a campaign of terrorising Sarajevo’s civilians with a campaign of sniper fire and artillery attacks. The final verdict in the Karadzic case will be handed down this month, while Mladic’s final verdict is expected next year.

The Hague tribunal’s verdicts have determined that units of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps intentionally targeted civilians while conducting a campaign of terror that lasted three-and-a-half years. It is alleged that the goal of the campaign was to put pressure on Sarajevo authorities to accept peace deals which would legalise ethnic cleansing by Bosnian Serb forces.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

The Federal Radio journalist Irena Antic was 16 when she was wounded in Sarajevo. She was hit by a sniper bullet while carrying firewood. ‘We did not know who might no longer be with us when we met the next time,’ Antic recalled. ‘We had a joke that each grenade and bullet had someone’s name written on them. The only question was when they would hit them …’

She was a witness to the both massacres at the Markale open market in Sarajevo in 1994 and 1995, when scores of civilians were killed by shells fired by the Bosnian Serb Army. She also saw the massacre in Vase Miskina Street in Sarajevo in 1992, when 28 people were killed while queueing for bread, and was nearby when there was a deadly mortar attack at a brewery in the city where people were queueing to pick up water supplies. ‘When the massacre happened at the brewery, I was just over 100 metres away, holding my water canisters. Somehow it all looked like Russian roulette to me. When my turn came, I felt that was it,’ she said.

Direct command responsibility

The siege of Sarajevo was instigated by the fourth corps of the Yugoslav People’s Army, the JNA, and Serb-led territorial defence units in the spring of 1992. After the Yugoslav authorities decided to withdraw the Belgrade-led JNA from Bosnia and Herzegovina, the National Assembly in Bosnia’s Serb-dominated Republika Srpska made the decision to establish the Army of Republika Srpska—the Bosnian Serb Army.

The Bosnian Serb Army’s Sarajevo Romanija-Corps had between six and 13 brigades during the war. ‘All the brigades were directly subordinate to the corps’ commander. The foremost direct command responsibility for all that happened in its zone of responsibility lay with the commander of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps,’ said Alija Kozljak, a former brigadier with the postwar Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Stanislav Galic was appointed commander of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps in September 1992. He remained in the position until 1994, when he was replaced by Dragomir Milosevic. In the first months of the war, according to Hague tribunal documents, the commander was Tomislav Sipcic. Available data suggests that more than 1,700 howitzers, cannons, short-range mortars, multiple rocket launchers and assault guns, plus over 100 tanks, around 150 armoured personnel carriers and more than 500 anti-aircraft weapons and machine guns, were deployed by the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps at positions surrounding Sarajevo, and were used to open fire on the city every day during the siege.

Names published

The ballistics expert Berko Zecevic put together an analysis for the Hague tribunal, demonstrating that in the 70 shelling incidents the projectiles were fired from territory controlled by the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps. ‘They were definitely not fired from the territories controlled by the Bosnian Army; they surely came deep from territory controlled by the VRS [Bosnian Serb Army],’ Zecevic said.

According to Kozljak, the shelling was conducted by various Sarajevo-Romanija Corps units: the First Sarajevo Mechanised Brigade from Lukavica, the Second Infantry Brigade from Lukavica, the Second Motorised Brigade from Sokolac, the First Ilidza Light Infantry Brigade from Lukavica, the First Ilijas Light Infantry Brigade, the Igman Light Infantry Brigade and the Kosevo Light Infantry Brigade. Kozljak said that each of the units had its own zone of responsibility as part of the ring around Sarajevo, and shelled the city directly from their battle positions. ‘The relevant brigade commanders were directly responsible for all actions undertaken by their brigades in their zones of responsibility, which were clearly specified,’ he explained.

Using Hague tribunal evidence, as well as numerous testimonies by former members of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps, the journalist Dzenana Karup Drusko published a list of troops who were in Bosnian Serb positions around the city during the war ‘The name of the person who was in charge of all snipers in the city is listed in documentation. The exact locations of sniper nests, from which the biggest number of citizens were killed, is known. All those people are at liberty,’ Karup Drusko said. ‘I published the names without prejudging anyone’s guilt or responsibility. But if the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps held the city under the siege for three-and-a-half years, and if people were killed every day, it means someone must be responsible for all that,’ she added.

Kozljak’s analysis meanwhile indicated that the Sarajevo-Romanija Mixed Regiment from Lukavica was responsible for the indirect and direct shelling of Sarajevo with 155mm and 105mm howitzers, as well as 128mm multiple rocket launchers. He said that the regiment was responsible for random and targeted fire at the city’s population. As for snipers, Kozljak pointed out that they were part of battalions and companies and the commanders who deployed them could be identified. ‘Battalion commanders, as well as commanders of companies and squads that were part of those battalions, were directly responsible for their actions, because there were orders for [snipers’] use and reports on their use,’ Kozljak said.

Indictments lacking

The Bosnian state prosecution has filed a total of 12 indictments against former members of Bosnian Serb military, police and paramilitary units, charging them with crimes in and around Sarajevo during the siege years, but none of them has been indicted for shelling or sniping. Zecevic said he was ‘shocked’ because nobody has ever asked him to help with any of the investigations. ‘Nobody has ever contacted me to help determine who was responsible for leading the units or to identify individuals who operated individual weapons or weapon batteries from which lethal projectiles were fired,’ he said.

Zlatka Imamovic, whose son was killed, said it was painful to see how slowly justice has moved to deal with the crimes committed during the 1990s siege, as many parents of children who died have also passed away over the years without seeing anyone brought to court to answer for the crimes. ‘If it continues to go on this way, I’m afraid it will be forgotten and that nobody will be tried for what they did … It’s sad and it hurts,’ she said.

She explained that her dream was to look into the eyes of the man who fired the grenade that ended the life of her son, Mirza. ‘I want to look at him and tell him what he took away from me, to show him photographs of what he took away,’ she said. ‘For me, even that would be enough.’

This article first appeared in Balkan Insight.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Politics ・ Siege of Sarajevo: perpetrators of deadly attacks remain unprosecuted

Filed Under: Politics

About Erna Mackic

Erna Mackic is executive editor of the Balkan Investigative Research Newtwork BiH publication Detektor and chair of the Association of Court Reporters in Sarajevo.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards