Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

How To Get Rid Of Germany’s Excessive Current Account Surplus

by Gustav Horn on 26th June 2017 @GustavAHorn

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Gustav Horn

Gustav Horn

There’s no end to the criticism of the excessive German current account surplus. Quite rightly, people suggest that this imbalance has the potential either to unleash violent currency fluctuations on a global scale or to generate a renewed debt crisis in the Euro Area. The consequences of such disruptions would also substantially damage the German economy. So, the question becomes more urgent: what contribution can Germany itself make in overcoming these economic troubles.

The demand is frequently made that wages in Germany should grow more strongly than up till now. The hope is that this would raise the price of exports and, thereby, foreign demand for German goods would drop. This alone would reduce the surplus in the current account. There would be an even stronger effect on the import side of the equation. This stronger wage dynamic would make incomes rise more powerfully. That in turn would raise domestic demand for imported goods, again reducing the surplus.

All these considerations are quite right in themselves. But the hopes bound up with this strategy that a more stable current account will emerge are way over the top. What’s more, the prime purpose here cannot be to moderate German exports but to raise imports. More powerful pay increases – as an IMK study shows – are simply not enough on their own to significantly cut the imbalance over a reasonable period of time.

The reasons for this rest in an incomplete understanding of the effects that accelerated pay increases bring about. As mentioned above, it’s not enough to factor in the effects on export and import volumes. The current account is a nominal concept that embraces both – effects on prices as well as on volumes. The surplus can be measured in the final instance in the difference between export yields and import expenditures.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Here we can see the first obstacle to any substantial adjustment. Higher wages lead to higher export prices and in Germany’s case this brings – because of the inelastic reaction in export demand to price rises – in the short term at least increased export yields despite declining export volumes, thereby working in the direction of an even higher surplus. Even the positive effects on imports are exaggerated. This lies with the very close integration of Germany in the global economy. Many export goods rely, meantime, on imported inputs. But this means that declining export volumes, taken by themselves, also bring declining import volumes. This counteracts the workings of higher incomes on stimulating imports and dampens their effect. In the final analysis, export yields do not drop to the extent one hoped for nor do expenditures on imports rise strongly enough to bring the current account into balance.

Are higher wage increases the wrong recipe, then? Absolutely not, they’re just not enough on their own. They require rather to be accompanied by measures on the fiscal policy side. And this is even possible without it being necessary to break the strict German rules on debt.

Higher pay increases bring with them increased income for the state. Taxes as well as social security contributions increase markedly with higher wages and incomes. The position of public budgets improves substantially.

If federal and federal state (Land) administrations, along with local councils, decide not to use this extra income to consolidate their finances but for (re)spending this would create a decidedly stronger impulse towards a more balanced current account. This impulse coming from the state works, moreover, on a continuous basis unlike a pay-rise. Part of increased government demand flows directly into imports, another part has an indirect effect through the impact it has on further increases in household incomes. This occurs without, as with wages, counter-effects such as export price increases or negative import reactions taking place.

The combination of dynamic pay increases and expansive fiscal policy therefore takes the current account a good deal further back into balance even if it takes a wee while. Even more is possible on a temporary basis. For the pay rises assumed in simulations remain so moderate that they do not lead to any redistribution in favour of wage-earners. This would, however, be helpful for a limited period. Equally, the state could temporarily – as excluded from the simulations – run up against the legal limits it sets on its debt. Taken together both would perceptibly accelerate the process of slashing the imbalance in the current account. So, Germany has it in its own hands to deal with its external imbalance ensuring greater stability at least within the Euro Area.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ How To Get Rid Of Germany’s Excessive Current Account Surplus

Filed Under: Politics

About Gustav Horn

Gustav Horn is scientific director of the Macroeconomic Policy Institute of the Hans Böckler Stiftung in Germany.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards