Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

The United Kingdom’s Brexit Vote Leads To A Major Economic Shock

by Giovanni Cozzi and Terry McKinley on 28th July 2016

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Giovanni Cozzi

Giovanni Cozzi

The vote for Brexit has led to a significant increase in uncertainty in both the political and economic spheres. Whilst the UK economy was already projected to slow down over the next five years, the vote is likely to lead to even greater economic deterioration, especially if the new government continues to pursue Mr. Osborne’s austerity agenda.

The likely outcome of increased uncertainty is that both public and private investment will fall and consumption will deteriorate, dragging down economic growth with them. In the short term we are likely to see the UK entering into a recession followed by a long period of stagnation that is accompanied by rising unemployment.

On a positive note, the devaluation of the pound would lead to an improvement in the country’s current account. However, financing from capital inflows would also be greatly diminished. Thus, the UK’s cherished position as a major international financial centre would likely to be noticeably weakened.

Terry McKinley

Terry McKinley

Using the Cambridge Alphametrics Model (CAM), a global macroeconomic model, we project the potential economic impact over the next five years of the vote for Brexit. This scenario is based on a small set of reasonable assumption, mainly with regards to private investment, consumption, government spending and revenue, and the exchange rate.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Private investment is assumed to fall noticeably. While investment is 14.6% of GDP in 2015, we estimate that by 2020 it could decline to 13% of GDP as a result of increased uncertainty and a reduction of investment funds from the European Union.

We also assume that the government continues to pursue its strategic objective of closing its fiscal deficit, by both increasing its revenue and reducing its expenditures. Government revenue would increase from 17% of GDP in 2015 to about 18.5% in 2020 while government expenditures would decline from 22% of GDP to about 20.5%.

Finally, with regards to the British pound, there has already been an immediate sharp devaluation of its nominal value in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 Brexit vote. Despite recent minor fluctuations of the pound, our projections suggest that the declining trend will continue through 2020. By that year, the nominal value would have declined by about 10%.

What is the impact of such trends on the UK economy? Our projections show that GDP growth would slide into recession, with growth dropping sharply to about -2.5% in late 2016. Already the projections for the second quarter of 2016 suggest a precipitous drop in growth. Our projections suggest that in 2017 the economic growth rate would still be -1.9% and in 2018 -0.3%, before it would turn mildly positive thereafter (Figure 1).

Figure 1. GDP Growth

cozzi_graph

Lower growth and investment would also lead to an increase in the unemployment rate, which would rise from 5.1% in 2015 to 6.7% by 2020.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Low growth and higher unemployment will also be accompanied by a decline in consumption per capita (from approximately £31,000 in 2015 to £28,500 in 2020). Additional likely causes of this decline are the projected rise in the prices of imported consumer goods (which is already happening), continuing uncertainty about household incomes and continuing government austerity policies.

Finally, whilst the current account will significantly improve as a result of the sharp fall in the British pound vis-à-vis the US Dollar, both foreign direct investment (FDI) and portfolio inflows will be significantly reduced by 2020. In 2015 these two components essentially accounted for the total net inflows of capital into the UK, amounting to about 14.3% of GDP. But by 2020 these two dominant items would shrink to about 7% of GDP.

Over the same period, capital outflows would also diminish. Comprising mainly Net ‘Other Investment’ (e.g., banking flows to other countries) and minor holdings of foreign-exchange reserves, these outflows would decline from about 7.8% of GDP in 2015 to only about 3.6% by 2020. The implication of these two trends is that the United Kingdom could become a significantly diminished international financial centre over the next five years as a result of the Brexit vote.

Brexit is likely to increase the problems that the UK economy has already been facing, and when it is coupled with continued austerity policies, the results could severely dampen the economy.

Since a reversal of a Brexit vote is unlikely at present, we would argue that the new government should reconsider Mr. Osborne’s austerity agenda and move instead to stimulate aggregate demand by significantly increasing public investment as an engine for growth and job creation.

The recent signals from the current administration suggest that austerity might be eased but certainly no sooner than late 2016 and to what degree remains unclear. Furthermore, the continuing uncertainty, coupled with a slowing global economy, is bound to have a negative economic impact on the European Union (EU). However, we would need to do further modelling to estimate the likely scale of this impact on the EU.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ The United Kingdom’s Brexit Vote Leads To A Major Economic Shock

Filed Under: Economy

About Giovanni Cozzi and Terry McKinley

Dr. Giovanni Cozzi is Senior Lecturer in Economics and Deputy Director Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre, University of Greenwich. Prof. Terry McKinley is Director Centre for Development Policy and Research, SOAS, University of London

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards