Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

The United Kingdom’s Brexit Vote Leads To A Major Economic Shock

Giovanni Cozzi and Terry McKinley 28th July 2016

Giovanni Cozzi

Giovanni Cozzi

The vote for Brexit has led to a significant increase in uncertainty in both the political and economic spheres. Whilst the UK economy was already projected to slow down over the next five years, the vote is likely to lead to even greater economic deterioration, especially if the new government continues to pursue Mr. Osborne’s austerity agenda.

The likely outcome of increased uncertainty is that both public and private investment will fall and consumption will deteriorate, dragging down economic growth with them. In the short term we are likely to see the UK entering into a recession followed by a long period of stagnation that is accompanied by rising unemployment.

On a positive note, the devaluation of the pound would lead to an improvement in the country’s current account. However, financing from capital inflows would also be greatly diminished. Thus, the UK’s cherished position as a major international financial centre would likely to be noticeably weakened.

Terry McKinley

Terry McKinley

Using the Cambridge Alphametrics Model (CAM), a global macroeconomic model, we project the potential economic impact over the next five years of the vote for Brexit. This scenario is based on a small set of reasonable assumption, mainly with regards to private investment, consumption, government spending and revenue, and the exchange rate.

Private investment is assumed to fall noticeably. While investment is 14.6% of GDP in 2015, we estimate that by 2020 it could decline to 13% of GDP as a result of increased uncertainty and a reduction of investment funds from the European Union.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

We also assume that the government continues to pursue its strategic objective of closing its fiscal deficit, by both increasing its revenue and reducing its expenditures. Government revenue would increase from 17% of GDP in 2015 to about 18.5% in 2020 while government expenditures would decline from 22% of GDP to about 20.5%.

Finally, with regards to the British pound, there has already been an immediate sharp devaluation of its nominal value in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 Brexit vote. Despite recent minor fluctuations of the pound, our projections suggest that the declining trend will continue through 2020. By that year, the nominal value would have declined by about 10%.

What is the impact of such trends on the UK economy? Our projections show that GDP growth would slide into recession, with growth dropping sharply to about -2.5% in late 2016. Already the projections for the second quarter of 2016 suggest a precipitous drop in growth. Our projections suggest that in 2017 the economic growth rate would still be -1.9% and in 2018 -0.3%, before it would turn mildly positive thereafter (Figure 1).

Figure 1. GDP Growth

cozzi_graph

Lower growth and investment would also lead to an increase in the unemployment rate, which would rise from 5.1% in 2015 to 6.7% by 2020.

Low growth and higher unemployment will also be accompanied by a decline in consumption per capita (from approximately £31,000 in 2015 to £28,500 in 2020). Additional likely causes of this decline are the projected rise in the prices of imported consumer goods (which is already happening), continuing uncertainty about household incomes and continuing government austerity policies.

Finally, whilst the current account will significantly improve as a result of the sharp fall in the British pound vis-à-vis the US Dollar, both foreign direct investment (FDI) and portfolio inflows will be significantly reduced by 2020. In 2015 these two components essentially accounted for the total net inflows of capital into the UK, amounting to about 14.3% of GDP. But by 2020 these two dominant items would shrink to about 7% of GDP.

Over the same period, capital outflows would also diminish. Comprising mainly Net ‘Other Investment’ (e.g., banking flows to other countries) and minor holdings of foreign-exchange reserves, these outflows would decline from about 7.8% of GDP in 2015 to only about 3.6% by 2020. The implication of these two trends is that the United Kingdom could become a significantly diminished international financial centre over the next five years as a result of the Brexit vote.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Brexit is likely to increase the problems that the UK economy has already been facing, and when it is coupled with continued austerity policies, the results could severely dampen the economy.

Since a reversal of a Brexit vote is unlikely at present, we would argue that the new government should reconsider Mr. Osborne’s austerity agenda and move instead to stimulate aggregate demand by significantly increasing public investment as an engine for growth and job creation.

The recent signals from the current administration suggest that austerity might be eased but certainly no sooner than late 2016 and to what degree remains unclear. Furthermore, the continuing uncertainty, coupled with a slowing global economy, is bound to have a negative economic impact on the European Union (EU). However, we would need to do further modelling to estimate the likely scale of this impact on the EU.

Giovanni Cozzi and Terry McKinley

Dr. Giovanni Cozzi is Senior Lecturer in Economics and Deputy Director Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre, University of Greenwich. Prof. Terry McKinley is Director Centre for Development Policy and Research, SOAS, University of London

You are here: Home / Economy / The United Kingdom’s Brexit Vote Leads To A Major Economic Shock

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube