Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Access to justice in the ‘Fit for 55’ package

Frederik Hafen 16th May 2022

Implementing the ‘Fit for 55’ package depends on citizens and NGOs being able to hold governments to account.

Fit for 55,access to justice,Aarhus convention
The Dutch Supreme Court in the Hague—its 2019 ruling in the Urgenda case, brought by citizens, obliged the government to reduce emissions urgently and significantly (ulyana_andreeva/shutterstock.com)

This week, European Parliament committees will vote on two crucial files of the ‘Fit for 55’ package of measures to cut greenhouse-gas emissions by at least 55 per cent by 2030: the Social Climate Fund and the Effort Sharing Regulation. With the focus on technicalities, the sharing of burdens and political compromises, one aspect has been left under-discussed: how can citizens hold their governments to account for climate commitments made in Brussels?

With access to justice, they can. This is exactly what happened in the Urgenda climate case against the Dutch government. Dutch citizens established that their government had a legal duty to take more effective action on climate change and, in a historic victory for climate justice, in December 2019 the Supreme Court in the Netherlands agreed.   

Access to justice is a democratic tool individuals and non-governmental organisations can use to hold public authorities accountable. In environmental and climate matters, it guarantees citizens the ability to ask review bodies or courts to verify whether an authority has respected the rights and fulfilled the requirements created by environmental and climate laws. But the right to access to justice cannot be taken for granted.

Aarhus convention

In this arena, the 1998 Aarhus convention and its three pillars—access to information, public participation and access to justice—are the cornerstones of environmental and climate governance in Europe. The European Union and all its member states are parties to the convention and therefore have an obligation to implement all its pillars.    


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

In reality, however, environmental and climate governance is far from ideal, with access to justice the most poorly implemented pillar. In the absence of a blanket EU provision, such as a specific directive, to guarantee it, across the union rules on access to justice are hopelessly fragmented. Enforcement of EU environmental law thus relies on the goodwill of member states, the willingness of the European Commission to take national governments to court and luck-of-the-draw, pro bono lawyers who are experts in navigating the EU legal landscape.

After a proposal for a directive on access to justice failed in 2004, in 2020 the commission published a communication which included a commitment to introduce access-to-justice provisions in every new legislative environmental proposal, calling on the Council of the EU and the European Parliament to support this. The EU institutions are however not adhering to this commitment and civil society is left to fight for amendments to most new or revised pieces of EU environmental law.

Fit for 55

With the most comprehensive review ever of EU rules on climate policy, the Fit For 55 package, fast advancing, individuals and civil society must be empowered in a straightforward way to challenge national authorities to keep their promises on emissions reductions or face the repercussions.

In a vote on Wednesday, the environment (ENVI) and employment (EMPL) committees of the European Parliament will have the opportunity to guarantee access to justice for citizens on the Social Climate Fund. The SCF is a legislative proposal which the commission presented last year, along with the rest of the Fit for 55 package, under the European Green Deal. Its aim is to bolster vulnerable households and micro-businesses against the costs of the green transition, with over €72 billion in EU funding envisaged for this purpose in 2025-32. 

Including access-to-justice provisions in the SCF regulation would create an added layer of accountability and empower citizens to take legal action when climate promises are broken. They could then challenge the Social Climate Plans each member state must submit to the commission, the way these plans were devised (for instance, in terms of stakeholder involvement) and/or any failures to keep relevant information about the SCF publicly available and up to date. This is important because these plans will determine the investments and measures that shape the green transition and the support given to vulnerable people.

An amendment on access to justice in the Effort Sharing Regulation will also be up for vote, in this case today. The ESR sets binding annual greenhouse-gas emission targets for a host of sectors not covered by the EU’s Emissions Trading System. They account for about 60 per cent of emissions and are, therefore, crucial for realising the Paris Agreement targets of keeping global temperature manageable. While the Emissions Trading System is market-based, the Effort Sharing Regulation is essentially a governance tool.

The main political fights are over percentage reductions, member states’ targets and loopholes and exceptions for certain sectors. The Effort Sharing Regulation is also an opportunity to oblige EU countries to set a concrete date by which they will achieve climate neutrality. An amendment that would require EU countries to set their own whole-of-economy climate-neutrality date has been tabled. Support for this would crucially strengthen the regulation. 

But if member states commit to targets this year yet do not meet them next year or five years down the line, a strongly-worded speech by an EU commissioner may not do the trick. This is why the law must include a specific article on an accountability tool for the public. Amendments have been tabled to include a provision on access to justice in the commitment by member states to limit their emissions by specific percentages. Hopefully these too will find support in the parliament.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Taking action

In light of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Fit For 55 package has become more important than ever. But its promises will not be fulfilled if the legislation does not allow citizens and NGOs to take action when their country is not hitting the mark.

Climate and environmental laws must have strong governance frameworks—underpinned by the principles of the Aarhus convention—to ensure that the EU and the member states, who will need to implement the legislation, can be held accountable on their obligations.

Frederik Hafen
Frederik Hafen

Frederik Hafen is policy officer for environmental democracy at the European Environmental Bureau (EEB). He has a masters in European public affairs from Maastricht University and was formerly policy adviser in the cabinet of the European ombudsman.

You are here: Home / Ecology / Access to justice in the ‘Fit for 55’ package

Most Popular Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse

Most Recent Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
artists,cultural workers Europe’s stars must shine for artists and creativesIsabelle Van de Gejuchte
transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube