Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Collective voice for platform workers: riders’ union struggles in Italy

by Claudia Marà and Valeria Pulignano on 10th December 2020

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Autonomous unions, allied with trade union confederations, have shown how collective bargaining can be won by the precariat which employers seek to fragment.

riders,food delivery,precariat,precarious
Claudia Marà

Food-delivery riders’ struggles have repeatedly made the headlines in Italy in the last few years. From the end of October, the peninsula was swept with couriers’ protests.

These followed the entry into force of an agreement signed by the employers’ association, Assodelivery (which includes Deliveroo, Glovo and Just Eat), and the organisation UGL (a ‘yellow’ union for platform workers) in September. It’s an agreement workers and trade unions—the main confederations (CGIL, CISL and UIL) and the autonomous riders’ unions active in Italy’s biggest cities—denounced.

riders,food delivery,precariat,precarious
Valeria Pulignano

In recent weeks, there have been positive signals. Just Eat announced its withdrawal from Assodelivery and its intention to hire couriers as dependent employees from 2021. The Italian platform Mymenu introduced hourly pay increases and a new set of bonuses for its workers.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

The three main union confederations signed a protocol with the logistics employers’ organisation, to extend an existing sectoral collective agreement to food-delivery riders. And the Italian Ministry of Labour hosted a meeting with the social partners to discuss the way forward, after the de facto rejection of the ‘pirate’ agreement signed by Assodelivery and UGL.

Tackling precariousness

Since 2016, the couriers have been getting together and organising in many Italian cities, starting activist groups and autonomous unions—such as ‘Riders’ Union Bologna’, ‘Deliverance Project’ in Turin and ‘Deliverance Milan’—to tackle precariousness and the lack of protections in the ‘gig’ economy. Enlarging their ranks with new workers—not least the many couriers with a migrant background, who account for large shares of food-delivery fleets—workers’ activist unions have been mobilising on the Italian streets through co-ordinated log-offs, strikes and pickets, including resisting anti-union moves by the platforms.

The actions of these collectives represent an important step towards workers’ democracy in app-based ‘workplaces’. The Italian riders’ experience shows that coming together and organising is not only a means to manifest discontent but also to resist the precarisation of pay and working conditions and indeed of life itself.

At the core of collective action has always been the desire to negotiate better pay and working conditions for all. And the autonomous riders’ collectives have won a seat around the bargaining table with the main trade union confederations, the government and the employers’ association, to negotiate an improvement of their pay and social conditions. This acknowledgment of the importance of collective bargaining in such a new and ‘atypical’ sector is, in itself, a key achievement.

Moreover, through encompassing collective agreements, decent pay and conditions can be secured via solidarity, defeating the strategies of fragmentation by employers. This is particularly important within the new employment setting of platform work, where asymmetric power relationships are not offset any more by the employer-employee nexus which underpinned the traditional employment relationship.

Against this background, autonomous riders’ groups and established unions have worked to align their positions at the bargaining table, thereby creating a national coalition under the name of the RidersXiDiritti Network. Although not without bumps on the road, the coalition has maintained a solid front in the negotiations with employers and it rejected in unison the sweetheart deal signed by Assodelivery and UGL.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Concertation table

The creation of a concertation table for social dialogue itself stemmed from a hot season of workers’ protests. Picking up on them, in mid-2018 the then minister of labour, Luigi Di Maio, proclaimed the government’s will to establish better working conditions for food-delivery couriers and invited workers’ and employers’ representatives to discuss possible avenues for agreements.

That national appeal to dialogue followed some progress already made on the ‘riders’ issue’ at local level: in spring that year, the city of Bologna had promoted a non-binding bill of rights for food-delivery couriers, signed by two of the six platforms active in the metropolitan area (and still in force today) after local dialogue between the social partners. The bill represented a first attempt to regulate food-delivery work by limiting platforms’ discretion over work allocation and workers’ disposability and establishing a permanent space for dialogue and bargaining among local institutions and workers’ and employers’ representatives.

As with the national dynamics which have characterised the recent victory for workers’ action against the dominance of arrogant platforms, what prompted the Bologna local authorities to deal with the riders’ issue at that time were the chains of mobilisation of food-delivery workers which had invaded the narrow city streets the previous winter—especially after a serious accident while a rider was delivering during a snowstorm.

Organising and struggles make collective workers’ voice heard. Encompassing bargaining structures for social dialogue allow that voice to endure and guarantee that solidarity prevails for the ‘collective worker’ which the autonomous riders have become.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Economy ・ Collective voice for platform workers: riders’ union struggles in Italy

Filed Under: Economy

About Claudia Marà and Valeria Pulignano

Claudia Marà is a PhD student in the Centre for Sociological Research at KU Leuven (Belgium), working within the framework of the ERC-funded REsPecTMe project. Valeria Pulignano is professor of sociology there.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards