Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Corporate Power vs. Social-Ecological Transformation: Why Progress Remains Stalled

Richard Bärnthaler and Andreas Novy 3rd February 2025

Fossil fuel giants and entrenched elites block climate action, perpetuating extraction, inequality, and ecological collapse.

u4219834672a0caaf c168 432d bb92 339228bd41af 0

As the latest COP summit reveals, hopes for meaningful climate action remain overshadowed by familiar obstacles: the entrenched power of corporate elites. Negotiations intended to curb emissions are diluted, delayed, or dismissed, as fossil fuel and other vested interests wield immense influence to preserve the status quo. The forces responsible for the climate crisis continue to steer the global agenda, sidelining discussions about transformative change. This is no accident—it stems from deeply rooted power structures within economic and political systems. Understanding these dynamics requires an exploration of how power complexes—coalitions of industries and elites—have evolved and now dominate the political economy.

A Brief History of Power Complexes

Capitalism’s drive for endless accumulation has fuelled an ever-expanding cycle of resource extraction, commodification, and reinvestment into further rounds of extraction and accumulation. As this process accelerates, it reshapes both society and nature. Power complexes are not merely products of these historical processes but actively shape them.

During the colonial-liberal era of 19th-century imperialism, a financial power complex held sway. A tightly knit group of banks and financiers controlled global capital, with the City of London at its centre, supported by the British Navy. Even major peripheral states were subject to stringent oversight from international investors, through mechanisms like the Turkish Ottoman Public Debt Administration and the Roosevelt Corollary. These enforced debt repayment from the Ottoman Empire and Latin American nations, ensuring creditor demands were prioritised. British “free-trade imperialism” came to an end with the onset of the Great Depression in 1929.

The mid-20th century ushered in the Fordist era, defined by mass production, strong labour unions, and domestic markets in the Global North. This weakened the global financial power complex. Simultaneously, fossil fuel and livestock-agribusiness complexes rose to prominence. Fossil fuels were used to extract more fossil fuels, with fossil capital intensifying its material flow. Governments reinforced the dominance of fossil capital through public investments such as highways—Ford in Detroit, Fiat in Mussolini’s Italy, Volkswagen in Hitler’s Germany. Meanwhile, the livestock-agribusiness complex expanded through the capitalisation of nature, industrialising agriculture. Reliant on petrochemical inputs like synthetic fertilisers and pesticides, farming became petro-farming, and pest control shifted to chemical extermination. Productivity soared, but so did biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emissions, and the displacement of smallholder farmers.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



By the 1970s, cracks in the Fordist system paved the way for neoliberalism, which revitalised the financial power complex through an era of financialisation while also fostering a new digital power complex. The recent rise of techno-fascists in the United States is the culmination of this influence. Once central to liberal narratives of “progressive neoliberalism,” digital corporations and figures like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel have exacerbated anti-democratic alliances, threatening democracy through misinformation, surveillance, and social control—now glaringly evident in their complicity in enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Under neoliberalism, for the first time, all four power complexes—financial, fossil fuel, livestock-agribusiness, and digital—interacted, unleashing unprecedented extractive forces of rents, materials, and data to accelerate capital accumulation. The interdependence of these complexes magnifies their power, creating a system that is not only highly extractive but also deeply resistant to change.

The Fossil Power Complex: Preserving the Status Quo

The fossil power complex exemplifies how entrenched interests shape policies and block progress. In the United States, for instance, 27 of BP’s 39 lobbyists in 2023 previously held government positions. Fossil fuel companies spend millions lobbying governments and funding trade associations such as the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers or FuelsEurope, which oppose Paris-aligned climate policies. These associations often act as “bad cops,” taking extreme stances so individual corporations can maintain a cleaner image.

Beyond overt lobbying, fossil fuel companies influence decision-making through privileged access to policymakers. After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the European Union’s Energy Platform Industry Advisory Group included major fossil fuel companies but excluded public interest organisations. This group, operating under a professional-secrecy clause, shaped the RePowerEU plan and new gas-sourcing initiatives, framing fossil fuels as vital to national security. This strategy exploits legitimate fears to justify investments in carbon-intensive infrastructure such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals.

The concept of “lock-in” illustrates the danger. Once investments are made in fossil infrastructure or technology, long-term dependencies form. For example, lobbying efforts in Germany enabled the approval of up to 12 LNG projects, with 7 new projects subsequently proposed or under construction—far exceeding the two recommended by the European Commission—potentially tying the country to gas for decades. While lobbying for expanded LNG infrastructure in countries like Germany, fossil companies have simultaneously opposed energy transition policies and promoted increased gas exploration in countries like Mauritania and Senegal. These actions effectively lock in fossil fuels across the entire value chain—from upstream production to downstream consumption.

Far from reactive measures, these efforts proactively shape infrastructure and policies to prolong the fossil fuel era, binding entire regions to a carbon-intensive future. Labelling LNG as “green” is yet another indication of how the fossil power complex manipulates political discourse. In the United States, emerging evidence shows that the total emissions intensity of the LNG export lifecycle—from production and transportation to end-use consumption—has a greenhouse gas footprint 33 percent higher than that of coal.

Overall, the structural bias towards techno-economic interests—often reinforced by co-opted climate science and policymaking—enables fossil fuel companies to position themselves as key advisers on the energy transition while branding themselves as innovators of negative-emission technologies to profitably absorb the carbon dioxide they profitably emit.

Breaking Entrenched Power

Effective responses to the current social-ecological crises cannot rely on technological fixes or profit-driven markets. The notion of “green capitalism” is a contradiction. Real change demands dismantling entrenched power structures and embracing economic democratisation and democratic planning. Promising approaches are increasingly addressing these critical challenges. These include pioneering research on influential networks of climate obstruction; impactful supply-side interventions that extend beyond efficiency improvements, potentially socialising investment and cutting profits; research into feasible strategies for de-growth and post-growth; and the tireless efforts of a few IPCC authors to challenge entrenched power dynamics. Until climate science, media, and political leaders confront these systemic issues—and abandon their techno-utopian fantasies—they remain complicit in perpetuating the very structures driving social-ecological collapse.

Richard Barnthaler
Richard Bärnthaler

Richard Bärnthaler (r.barnthaler@leeds.ac.uk) is an assistant professor in ecological economics at the University of Leeds Sustainability Research Institute. He is a member of the board of the European Society for Ecological Economics.

Novy Andreas
Andreas Novy

Andreas Novy is head of the Institute for Spatial and Social-Ecological Transformations (ISSET) at the Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU Wien). He is president of the International Karl Polanyi Society (IKPS).

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834670 4977 8362 2b68e3507e6c 2 Europe’s Far Right Copies Trump—And It’s WorkingPaul Mason
u421983467645c be21 1cdd415d1c01 2 America’s Systemic Chaos Strategy: Europe Must Forge a New PathMario Pianta
u42198346ae 124dc10ce3a0 0 When Ideology Trumps Economic InterestsDani Rodrik
u4219834676e9f0d82cb8a5 2 The Competitiveness Trap: Why Only Shared Prosperity Delivers Economic Strength—and Resilience Against the Far RightMarija Bartl

Most Popular Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
09d21a9 The Future of Social Democracy: How the German SPD can Win AgainHenning Meyer
u421983462 041df6feef0a 3 Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher EducationManuel Muñiz

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp