Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Food-delivery riders, algorithms and autonomy

by Valeria Pulignano and Claudia Marà on 21st January 2021

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

A ruling by a court in Bologna has undermined platforms’ claims to impartial algorithms and autonomous contractors.

Deliveroo,couriers
Valeria Pulignano

Work under capitalism is a story of employers’ attempts to control labour, to guarantee and enhance profitability. A ‘disciplined’ labour force is induced to work more productively for longer.

Today there are forces which pretend to push in a different direction, presenting workers within the digital market economy as free and autonomous from hierarchical structures of control. But are they really?

Deliveroo,couriers
Claudia Marà

Discriminatory system

According to a recent ruling by the Court of Bologna against Deliveroo, one of the biggest food-delivery platforms, in a case brought by three unions, its riders are far from being free or even autonomous workers. The court found it to be the ‘conscious choice’ of management to subordinate riders through a ‘discriminatory’ reputational system.

The Italian court considered the ‘Frank’ algorithm, developed by Deliveroo to allocate orders, as allowing the exercise of control at the expense of workers’ social rights. This is ‘an epochal turning point in the conquest of workers’ and trade union rights and freedoms in the digital world,’ Tania Sacchetti, confederal secretary of the CGIL trade union confederation, commented.

The court affirmed that ‘when it wants, the platform can take off the blindfold that makes it “blind” or “unconscious” with respect to the reasons for the rider’s failure to perform work’. Thus, by considering the anti-discrimination regime to be applicable, it recognised the right of riders not to be discriminated against in access to work—regardless of the definition of their relationship—as also the right of trade unions to seek protection on their behalf.

Join our growing community newsletter!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Perverse outcomes

As is often true of situations such as this, there is not a one-size-fits-all solution and co-ordinating among different strategies, actions and levels is probably the way for workers and their union representatives to respond to the perverse outcomes produced by the digital economy. The Deliveroo case bears this out.

The case is one of many which trade unions within the CGIL confederation have opened against international food-delivery platforms, also including Glovo and Uber Eats. Litigation is one of the strategies workers in the Italian sector have been pursuing—as in other countries—and quite successfully too.

Systematic recourse to the courts by established trade unions has worked in synergy with the informal workers’ unions, such as Riders’ Union Bologna and its peers in other Italian cities. The traditional unions use the leverage of their established position within the industrial-relations system, while grassroots unions are able to aggregate the voices, experiences and complaints of platform couriers on the ground.

Media attention

Another aspect of the Italian story has been the favourable attention from the media and public opinion to the ‘riders’ issue’ over the past three years, as a result of massive street mobilisations and online campaigns by the workers since autumn 2017. Taking to the streets and virtual spaces, food-delivery riders have made their unsafe and unstable working conditions visible, quickly becoming the epitome of precarious workers in Italy.


We need your help! Please join our mission to improve public policy debates.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house or big advertising partners. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you. You can support us by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month.

Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Given this visibility, the government could not shy away. Amid the volatile coalition arrangements of recent years, a concertation table co-ordinated by the Ministry of Labour to ‘solve’ the riders issue took off in 2018 and is still in place, despite a ‘pirate’ agreement crafted between employers and yellow unions.

In other words, riders are making the headlines in Italy. They have drawn the media and public opinion towards their dire situation—as recently when a 50-year-old courier was robbed and violently beaten up by a gang of youngsters in the Naples area (a video went viral and all national media reported the news).

The Bologna ruling puts wind in their sails.

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
Home ・ Economy ・ Food-delivery riders, algorithms and autonomy

Filed Under: Economy

About Valeria Pulignano and Claudia Marà

Valeria Pulignano is professor of sociology in the Centre for Sociological Research at KU Leuven (Belgium), where Claudia Marà is a PhD student within the framework of the ERC-funded REsPecTMe project.

Partner Ads

Most Popular Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
China,cold war The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
Covid 19 vaccine Designing vaccines for people, not profits Mariana Mazzucato, Henry Lishi Li and Els Torreele

Most Recent Posts

inequalities,dissatisfaction with democracy Inequalities and democratic corrosion Piergiuseppe Fortunato
BBC,public value Don’t defund the BBC Mariana Mazzucato
Deregulation,Better Regulation,one in one out Leaving behind the EU’s deadly addiction to deregulation Patrick ten Brink
regulation Making EU regulation better for all Isabelle Schömann
governance The crisis after the crisis Christof Schiller, Thorsten Hellmann and Karola Klatt

Other Social Europe Publications

RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020
Corporate taxation in a globalised era
The transformation of work
The coronavirus crisis and the welfare state

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

FEPS Progressive Yearbook

Twenty-twenty has been an extraordinary year. The Covid-19 pandemic and the multidimensional crisis that it triggered have boosted existing trends and put forward new challenges. But they have also created unexpected opportunities to set a new course of action for the European Union and—hopefully—make a remarkable leap forward in European integration.

The second edition of the Progressive Yearbook, the yearly publication of the Foundation for European Progressive studies, revolves around the exceptional events of 2020 and looks at the social, economic and political impact they will have in 2021. It is a unique publication, which aims to be an instrument for the progressive family to reflect on the recent past and look ahead to our next future.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Renewing labour relations in the German meat industry: an end to 'organised irresponsibility'?

Over the course of 2020, repeated outbreaks of Covid-19 in a number of large German meat-processing plants led to renewed public concern about the longstanding labour abuses in this industry. New legislation providing for enhanced inspection on health and safety, together with a ban on contract work and limitations on the use of temporary agency employees, holds out the prospect of a profound change in employment practices and labour relations in the meat industry. Changes in the law are not sufficient, on their own, to ensure decent working conditions, however. There is also a need to re-establish the previously high level of collective-bargaining coverage in the industry, underpinned by an industry-wide collective agreement extended by law to cover the entire sector.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Working on digital labour platforms: a trade union guide for trainers on crowd-, app- and platform-based work

This guide aims to raise awareness about the reality of platform work among national trade union organizations. It provides trade union trainers with all the necessary pedagogical elements to deliver education activities at national level, compatible with various professional sectors as well as different time/resource availabilities.

It covers a wide range of needs:

• information on the concept of platform work, its evolution and impact on the labour market;

• development of competences for trade union representatives involved in social dialogue in sectors with a high prevalence of platform workers, and

• raised awareness of the importance of trade union action for decent working conditions for platform workers.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards