Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

The global AI race—it’s time to slow down

German Bender 15th February 2023

The world’s largest companies cannot be given free rein in their competition to capitalise artificial intelligence.

AI,artificial intelligence,ChatGPT
Turns out ChatGPT is a bit more coy about itself (Ascannio/shutterstock.com)

What is the best way to develop artificial intelligence? This question, long theoretical, is quickly becoming a hands-on concern, which will soon demand that important strategic choices be made. We are seeing two completely different approaches play out before our eyes.

One is the race among global technology giants which began with the recent launch of the Microsoft-funded ChatGPT, already provoking promises of similar systems from Google and the Chinese company Baidu. In these cases, the market (or, rather, the profit motive) is the mechanism driving companies to make decisions they probably should—and perhaps would prefer to—postpone.

The other is the European Union’s process to regulate artificial intelligence, especially through the comprehensive AI Act legislative package and related standards. This will classify systems according to four risk levels: unacceptable, high, limited and minimal/zero. Here, the modus operandi is democratic and political, expressed through legislation and other forms of regulation.

So far, the market has been dominant—although often supported by government loans and public investment in research and entrepreneurship. This is partly due to the rapid pace of technological change, making it difficult for democratic institutions and nation-states to keep up. Legally as well as technically, regulating AI has proved extremely difficult.

International efforts

ChatGPT illustrates some of the difficulties—and the risks. The system is accessible all over the world and will probably spread quickly when Microsoft incorporates it into its many products and allows other companies to do the same. Similar diffusion effects are likely to follow from Google’s and Baidu’s AI systems.

It is not evident how to regulate effectively this inherently global and amorphous technology, and the influence of individual countries may well be very limited. For this reason, international efforts are under way. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization launched the first global agreement on the Ethics of AI in 2021 and there are now processes around the world—even in the United States—to regulate AI in various ways.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



The EU initiative to create legislation and standards to ensure ethical and sustainable AI has been a catalyst. The union’s influence should not be underestimated: a market of 500 million people with globally high incomes is not insignificant. The hope is that a rapidly developed EU regulation could have a normalising effect on the world market—although that is a highly uncertain prospect.

One hurdle relates to Baidu’s involvement in the race: authoritarian governments intend to use AI technology for surveillance and repression, and it is not very plausible that such states would voluntarily comply with EU regulations. In the case of China it is not even necessary, as the domestic market is large enough for AI technology to be developed quickly and according to completely different rules and norms than in the US or Europe.

Explosive spread

Within two months of its launch, ChatGPT had accrued 100 million users. Market forces can bring about the explosive spread of AI technologies not fully understood by the companies which develop them and which they are reluctant to explain to outsiders. Several users have managed to ‘trick’ ChatGPT into giving answers of which it is not supposed to be capable: providing recipes for drugs or explosives and expressing racist views.

Why does ChatGPT display this unexpected and contradictory behaviour? No one really knows and the company behind the technology, OpenAI, is hardly open when it comes to information. So I asked ChatGPT. Cryptically, it replied: ‘[A]s an AI model trained by OpenAI, I am constantly under development and improvement.’

It seems very difficult, even for the system’s creators, to regulate its usage and functionality. Even more caution should guide the use and spread of more complex systems with even more serious consequences that we cannot predict and prevent. The risks of letting the market disseminate AI technology while sparking an arms race among competitors should be obvious.

Potential harms

Many scholars have pointed to the societal dangers of rapid and uncontrolled AI development. Daron Acemoglu, professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has warned that rapid technological change has to be paired with welfare and labour-market reforms to prevent growing inequality, erosion of democracy and heightened polarisation. A similar approach has been proposed by the Harvard economist Dani Rodrik: ‘Government policies can help guide automation and artificial-intelligence technologies along a more labour-friendly path that complements workers’ skills instead of replacing them.’

The Swedish mathematician Olle Häggström, an expert on the existential risks of AI, has long warned of potential harms ranging from surveillance and unemployment to autonomous weapon systems and a future where machines simply take over the world. He has been concerned about the launch of ChatGPT. He sees it as an indication of how difficult will be the so called AI-alignment problem—designing into an AI system all the guardrails against going off track—for more capable, and consequently more dangerous, systems.

There is a case to be made for stopping or severely restricting certain types of systems until we better understand them. This would require extensive debate, education and communication, grounded democratically. Otherwise, there would likely be pushback from publics deprived of these technologies (especially if people in other countries could use them). This has already happened with the General Data Protection Regulation: while it has very many positive aspects, the GDPR is widely disliked and ridiculed, the EU having managed to paint itself as a bureaucratic colossus intent on making it harder for regular people to use the internet.

More and better

Some view AI regulation as an obstacle to innovation and warn that the European approach could reduce the EU to an AI backwater. Meanwhile, the US and China would leap ahead, being less concerned with legislation, industry standards and ethical guidelines.

Of course, regulation is not perfect and states are not always benevolent nor wise. Clearly, we need a combination of market and regulation. But given the potential risks, and the fast pace of technological development and diffusion, we have had too much of the former and too little of the latter.

Markets do not sufficiently counteract ‘negative externalities’ (undesirable side-effects). They do not distribute the economic value created by technology in a sustainably equal way. They do not incorporate social or political considerations. And they rarely contribute to technological solutions which benefit society as a whole.

Most of us want more and better AI. But for that, we need more and better regulation.

German Bender
German Bender

German Bender is chief analyst at the Swedish think-tank Arena. A PhD candidate at Stockholm School of Economics, he was a visiting research fellow at Harvard Law School in 2023.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834674a bf1a 0f45ab446295 0 Germany’s Subcontracting Ban in the Meat IndustryŞerife Erol, Anneliese Kärcher, Thorsten Schulten and Manfred Walser
u4219834dafae1dc3 2 EU’s New Fiscal Rules: Balancing Budgets with Green and Digital AmbitionsPhilipp Heimberger
u42198346d1f0048 1 The Dangerous Metaphor of Unemployment “Scarring”Tom Boland and Ray Griffin
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp