Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

The underestimated strength of European solidarity

by Jürgen Gerhards and Holger Lengfeld on 3rd September 2019

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

The evidence shows that citizens are willing to exhibit more European solidarity than has so far been appreciated or tested.

European solidarity
Jürgen Gerhards

Since 2010, the European Union has found itself in one of the greatest concatenations of crises since its emergence. The economic crisis, the associated eurozone crisis and the sovereign-debt crisis experienced by some of its members, as well as the refugee crisis stemming from desperation beyond the EU’s borders, have all challenged the strength of European solidarity. Many politicians and political scientists claim this is poorly developed and is buckling further under pressure. But is it really true that citizens reject European solidarity?

European solidarity
Holger Lengfeld

In a recent monograph we assessed this empirically. By European solidarity, we mean its extension beyond one’s own nation-state: recipients of solidarity are other EU countries or citizens living in another EU country.

We distinguish four domains of European solidarity. First, fiscal solidarity is defined as citizens’ willingness to support indebted European countries financially. Secondly, welfare-state solidarity is their willingness to support those in need—the unemployed, the sick, the elderly—regardless of where they live in the EU and to reduce inequality between rich and poor people in Europe. Thirdly, we define territorial solidarity as citizens’ willingness to reduce inequality between poor and rich EU countries. Finally, the refugee crisis has raised two questions—of external solidarity, defined as support for EU member states granting asylum to refugees, and internal solidarity, or the willingness to support burden-sharing among the member states.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

For each domain we examined whether the majority of all Europeans, and a majority in each European country, supported the idea of European solidarity and whether Europe constituted a space of solidarity distinguishable from the global and the national.

Quite surprising

Our survey, conducted in 13 EU countries in 2016, revealed quite surprising findings. Overall, Europe’s citizens exhibit notably stronger solidarity with citizens of other EU countries and with other EU states than many social scientists and politicians—particularly from the Eurosceptic camp—have presumed so far.

In terms of fiscal solidarity, two thirds of respondents were willing to give emergency aid to EU crisis countries. While differences in approval among the 13 countries were apparent, a majority in all were in favour of European fiscal solidarity. European solidarity is somewhat less than towards crisis regions within one’s own state but considerably more than towards crisis countries not part of the EU.

Regarding welfare-state solidarity, at least two thirds of respondents approved of support for fellow Europeans at risk and the redistribution of wealth from rich to poor people across the EU. Differences in approval by country were rather small. Although national welfare-state institutions remained the first focus of respondents, differences between the two territorial spaces—domestic and European—were negligible.

As to territorial solidarity, more than 70 per cent of respondents were in favour of reducing spatial differences among EU member states. Support was only slightly smaller than for equalisation measures within the nation-state, whereas a global redistribution scheme would barely find majority support.

Complex and differentiated

Regarding refugee solidarity, a more complex and differentiated picture emerges. We found strong differences among countries, although the overall approval rate for accepting refugees in Europe attained a two-thirds majority. Most citizens in Cyprus and in the three Visegrád countries surveyed (Poland, Slovakia and Hungary) were not willing to grant refugees the right to stay in Europe if they were persecuted because of a Muslim affiliation.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

A similar picture was apparent when it came to internal solidarity. Whilst respondents in all western- and southern-European countries supported the idea that refugees should be distributed equally among the member states, three quarters of Polish, Hungarian and Slovakian citizens rejected this.

Of all the crises which the EU faces, the refugee crisis thus challenges European solidarity the most. Overall, however, our results do not support the presumption, formulated by conservatives, Eurosceptics and even some left-leaning pundits, that the majority of citizens would veto the institutionalisation of European solidarity. In fact, the evidence provides encouragement for European elites to drive forward the European project.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Politics ・ The underestimated strength of European solidarity

Filed Under: Politics

About Jürgen Gerhards and Holger Lengfeld

Jürgen Gerhards is professor of sociology at the Freie Universität Berlin. His research interests include comparative cultural sociology and the sociology of European integration. Holger Lengfeld is professor of sociology at Leipzig University. His research focuses on social stratification, inequality and European social integration.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards