Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Europe’s solution to its energy dependence

Michael Davies-Venn 23rd March 2022

Europe could simply buy fewer fossil fuels from Russia, maybe more from elsewhere—but there is a more fundamental answer.

Russia,fossil fuels,energy dependence,renewable energy
Russian tanks: petroleum ones, in St Petersburg (Grigvovan / shutterstock.com)

The second largest global oil exporter is waging war and everyone seems to have been caught napping. Weeks passed after the missiles started to rain down on Ukrainians before sanctions on Russia’s fossil fuels were discussed, exposing fractures in the European response.

While the British prime minister, Boris Johnsion, argued that ‘we need to get ourselves off that addiction’, just how to sever the hand that feeds—now dripping in Ukrainian blood—is a question no one seems able to answer without compromising on the universal norms so vital to global peace. And while thousands of Ukrainians huddle underground from bombardment and many more seek shelter in foreign lands, the price of oil continues to rise—in a very short time reaching almost $130.

Unlike in previous wars, with their ramifications for oil prices, each day however we approach the cusp of an existential crisis made possible by burning oil, gas and coal for economic prosperity. Yet the impacts of climate change—from heatwaves and drought to floods and rising sea levels—are often bracketed out of the ‘What is to be done with Russia?’ debate.

As the price of a commodity increases, demand decreases. Last year, when oil was cheaper, according to the International Energy Agency, global energy-related carbon-dioxide emissions rose by 6 per cent to 36.3 billion tonnes, the highest ever.


Become part of our Community of Thought Leaders


Get fresh perspectives delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for our newsletter to receive thought-provoking opinion articles and expert analysis on the most pressing political, economic and social issues of our time. Join our community of engaged readers and be a part of the conversation.

Sign up here

So the world stands to lose much if the United States president, Joe Biden, succeeds in securing greater oil output from Saudi Arabia, the largest exporter. (Not forgetting that a then United Nations special rapporteur, now Amnesty International leader, Agnès Callamard, concluded that Riyadh had been responsible for the 2018 ‘extrajudicial killing‘ of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi.)

Just two years ago most developed countries created economic rescue packages in response to Covid-19. With little debate, trillions were committed to stop a virus from collapsing capitalism. In similar vein, trillions must now be put into massively scaling up renewable-energy generation.

The technology has long proven adequate: the sun and wind are waiting to be fully tapped, while it is past time for the oil tap to be shut. Funding the transition would create jobs and stimulate growth, while addressing the climate crisis. It is the short- as well as long-term solution to Russia’s tainted fossil fuels.

Virtually dependent

Oil may be a quintessential global commodity but its shortage affects Europe and the US differently. With the latter responsible for only 8 per cent of Russian oil imports, Biden had little to lose from banning it from American cars. But with so much fossil fuel flowing from Russia to the European Union and the continent’s economic powerhouse virtually dependent on it for its energy, Europeans have more to worry about.

Should Europe continue buying oil which Ukraine’s foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, said ‘smells of Ukrainian blood’? ‘While we condemn Russia’s armed offensive and we also condemn the war, we will not allow Hungarian families to be made to pay the price,’ the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán, insisted. And the German finance minister, Christian Lindner, was blunt: ‘We should not limit our ability to sustain ourselves,’ he told the tabloid Bild. The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, however urged: ‘We must become independent from Russian oil, coal and gas. We simply cannot rely on a supplier who explicitly threatens us.’

The war is straining European solidarity but the political choice is not between reducing Russian oil, coal and gas—and replacing it with other sources of fossil fuels—or allowing its full flow to continue. The right option is to rapidly increase and sustain public investments in renewable energy, to send factories spouting forth solar panels to dot the rooftops of European homes. It is to democratise and socialise European energy generation, giving greater control to ordinary people who are weeping at the wanton waste of life in Ukraine. The right choice will uncompromisingly uphold those liberal values which the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, deems ‘obsolete’.

Not fit for purpose

Fully 90 per cent of gas consumed in the EU, 27 per cent of oil and 46 per cent of coal come from Russia. In response to the war, the commission has taken a step towards European energy independence. Unfortunately, its REPowerEU is not fit for purpose.

It is premised on the familiar market mantra about demand and supply—making the category error of treating energy as a commodity rather than a public good—which has failed to stimulate the necessary vertiginous growth in renewable-energy output. This though the commission fully accepts that ‘the case for a rapid clean energy transition has never been stronger and clearer’.


Support Progressive Ideas: Become a Social Europe Member!


Support independent publishing and progressive ideas by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month. You can help us create more high-quality articles, podcasts and videos that challenge conventional thinking and foster a more informed and democratic society. Join us in our mission - your support makes all the difference!

Become a Social Europe Member

REPowerEU could potentially ‘empower consumers’ but not by ‘tapping into the potential of demand-side flexibility to respond to fluctuations in demand and supply’. Brussels must use this crisis as an opportunity to take revolutionary decisions by substantially increasing public funding for renewable energy. It can no longer wait for the private sector to lead Europe’s energy independence.

Democratic and decentralised

This war has cast in a stark spotlight the speed with which such funds must be more democratically disbursed, to develop a more decentralised European energy infrastructure that is more public. This is a faster route to energy independence than searching for new sources of oil, coal and gas. It will also allow citizens to produce energy. A decentralised energy infrastructure makes sense as a defence and economic policy—not just ecologically.

An unfortunate truth is that there will be another war and that it too will more than likely inflate the price of oil. The unfolding climate catastrophes, uncertainties about the course of this war and the lessons learnt from it about Europe’s vulnerability are sufficient inducements to take decisions on Russian fossil fuels that cleanse consciences, secure energy independence and mitigate climate disasters.

Pics2
Michael Davies-Venn

Michael Davies-Venn is a public-policy analyst and political-communications expert, based in Berlin, focused on issues of global governance, including climate change and human rights. He is a guest researcher in the Ethics of the Anthropocene Programme at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

You are here: Home / Ecology / Europe’s solution to its energy dependence

Most Popular Posts

Russia,information war Russia is winning the information warAiste Merfeldaite
Nanterre,police Nanterre and the suburbs: the lid comes offJoseph Downing
Russia,nuclear Russia’s dangerous nuclear consensusAna Palacio
Belarus,Lithuania A tale of two countries: Belarus and LithuaniaThorvaldur Gylfason and Eduard Hochreiter
retirement,Finland,ageing,pension,reform Late retirement: possible for many, not for allKati Kuitto

Most Recent Posts

Nagorno-Karabakh,European Union,EU,Azerbaijan,Armenia Azerbaijan exploits vacuum on Nagorno-KarabakhGeorge Meneshian
Abuse,work,workplace,violence Abuse at work: who bears the brunt?Agnès Parent-Thirion and Viginta Ivaskaite-Tamosiune
Ukraine,fatigue Ukraine’s cause: momentum is diminishingStefan Wolff and Tetyana Malyarenko
Vienna,social housing Vienna social-housing model: celebrated but misusedGabu Heindl
social democracy,nation-state Social democracy versus the nativist rightJan Zielonka

Other Social Europe Publications

strategic autonomy Strategic autonomy
Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 scaled 1 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI European Collective Bargaining Report 2022 / 2023

With real wages falling by 4 per cent in 2022, workers in the European Union suffered an unprecedented loss in purchasing power. The reason for this was the rapid increase in consumer prices, behind which nominal wage growth fell significantly. Meanwhile, inflation is no longer driven by energy import prices, but by domestic factors. The increased profit margins of companies are a major reason for persistent inflation. In this difficult environment, trade unions are faced with the challenge of securing real wages—and companies have the responsibility of making their contribution to returning to the path of political stability by reducing excess profits.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The future of remote work

The 12 chapters collected in this volume provide a multidisciplinary perspective on the impact and the future trajectories of remote work, from the nexus between the location from where work is performed and how it is performed to how remote locations may affect the way work is managed and organised, as well as the applicability of existing legislation. Additional questions concern remote work’s environmental and social impact and the rapidly changing nature of the relationship between work and life.


AVAILABLE HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound Talks: does Europe have the skills it needs for a changing economy?

In this episode of the Eurofound Talks podcast, Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound’s research manager, Tina Weber, its senior research manager, Gijs van Houten, and Giovanni Russo, senior expert at CEDEFOP (The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training), about Europe’s skills challenges and what can be done to help workers and businesses adapt to future skills demands.

Listen where you get your podcasts, or for free, by clicking on the link below


LISTEN HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The summer issue of the Progressive Post magazine by FEPS is out!

The Special Coverage of this new edition is dedicated to the importance of biodiversity, not only as a good in itself but also for the very existence of humankind. We need a paradigm change in the mostly utilitarian relation humans have with nature.

In this issue, we also look at the hazards of unregulated artificial intelligence, explore the shortcomings of the EU's approach to migration and asylum management, and analyse the social downside of the EU's current ethnically-focused Roma policy.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube